Investigators are testing whether machine learning prediction models integrated into a health care model will accurately identify participants who may benefit from a comprehensive review by a palliative care specialist, and decrease time to receiving a palliative care consult in an inpatient setting.
The need for timely palliative care is crucial. Aging patient populations are becoming more complex, often needing care from multiple specialties. There has been a growing mismatch between clinical care and patient preferences particularly with regards to services near end-of-life. Research has shown that that most people prefer to die at home despite the majority dying outside of the home (nursing home or hospital). Given the current model of care and incentives palliative care is considered the care of last resort after all attempts at cure have been exhausted. This delay can lead to sub-optimal symptom management for pain and lower quality of life. As the demand for palliative care increases, policy initiatives and referral triage tools to that lead to quality palliative care services are needed. In 2018 the Mayo Clinic developed a fully integrated information technology (IT) solution focusing on the identification of patients who may benefit from early palliative care review. The tool, known as Control Tower, pulls disparate data sources centered on a machine learning algorithm which predicts the need for palliative care in hospital. This algorithm was put into production as of December 2018 into a silent mode. The algorithm along with other key patient indicators are integrated into a graphical user interface (GUI) which allows a human operator to review the algorithm predictions and subsequently record the operator's assessment. The tool is expected to enhance risk assessment and create a healthcare model in which palliative care can pro-actively and effectively screen for patient need. Anticipated benefits of the approach include improved symptom control and patient satisfaction as well as a measurable impact on inpatient hospital mortality. The overall objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness and implementation of the Control Tower palliative care algorithm into hospital practice by creating a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial in 16 inpatient units. By creating an algorithm that automatically screens and monitors patient health status during inpatient hospitalization, the investigators hypothesize that participants will receive needed palliative care earlier than under the usual course of care. In addition to testing clinical effectiveness study members will also collect data for process measures to assess the algorithm and healthcare performance after translation of the prediction algorithm from a research domain to a practice setting.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
2,231
A workstation and software tool that extracts medical data from Mayo's data mart and electronic health record, and processes it through a prediction model that determines whether a patient is suited for a palliative care consult.
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Timely identification for need of palliative care
Measured as time in hours to the electronic record of consult by the palliative care team in the inpatient setting.
Time frame: 12 months
The number of inpatient palliative care consults
Measured by the rate of palliative care consults in the inpatient units of interest
Time frame: 12 months
Timely identification for need of palliative care per unit
Measured as time in hours to the electronic record of consult by the palliative care team in the inpatient setting for each of the 16 nursing units.
Time frame: 12 months
Transition time to hospice-designated bed
For all patients with Medicare insurance the time until transferred to a hospice-designated bed from admission.
Time frame: 12 months
Time to hospice designation
Measured as time in hours to the electronic record of consult by the hospice care team in the inpatient setting.
Time frame: 12 months
Emergency Department visit within 30 days of discharge
Measured by the number of study participants who upon discharge from the inpatient setting are readmitted to the Emergency Department at any Mayo Clinic facility within 30 days.
Time frame: 12 months
Hospitalization or readmission within 30 days of discharge
Measured by the number of study participants who upon discharge from the inpatient setting are readmitted to an inpatient unit at any Mayo Clinic facility within 30 days (excluding transfers and planned readmits).
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 12 months
ICU transfers
Measured by the number of study participants who transferred to a intensive care unit during their inpatient stay.
Time frame: 12 months
Ratio of inpatient hospice death to non-hospice hospital deaths
Measured by the number of deaths of study participants in hospice designated beds by the number of deaths in non-hospice beds.
Time frame: 12 months
Rate of discharge to external hospice
Measured by the number of participants whose electronic health record indicates discharge to external hospice.
Time frame: 12 months
Inpatient length of stay
Measured by the difference between admission to first unit to discharge from hospital for all study participants.
Time frame: 12 months