Tinnitus is the perception of a sound in the absence of an audible source. Currently up to 15% of the general population suffers chronically from tinnitus. The most severe degree of tinnitus ís experienced by 2.4% of the population and is associated with insomnia, depression; anxiety and even suicide. Up to date there is no effective standard therapy. Current therapies mostly focus on treating the distress caused by tinnitus instead of reducing the actual phantom sound. Nevertheless, many patients do not benefit from the current approaches and become severe and chronic tinnitus sufferers. In these patients neuromodulation-based treatments can be a promising option. Tinnitus perception is associated with many complex changes in several different brain structures. The general accepted hypothesis is that neuronal changes occur in both auditory and non-auditory brain structures, most often as a compensating mechanism on reduced input from the auditory nerve caused by cochlear hair cell damage. These central neuronal changes include an increase in spontaneous firing rate, synchronized activity, bursting activity and tonotopic reorganization. In high-frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) a reversible lesion-like effect is mimicked. From findings in Parkinson's disease patients who also had tinnitus and were treated with DBS, it is known that stimulation can alter or even completely diminish perception of tinnitus. It can be expected that modulation of specific structures within the complex tinnitus pathways can disrupt pathological neuronal activity and thereby alter tinnitus perception or distress caused by this phantom sensation. The investigators found in animal studies that DBS in the central auditory pathway can indeed significantly decrease tinnitus-like behavior. In a questionnaire study the investigators found that around one-fifth of the patients would be reasonably willing to accept invasive treatments and one-fifth would be fully willing to undergo invasive treatment like DBS. Based on preclinical studies and human case studies, the investigators expect that DBS of the central auditory pathway will inhibit tinnitus perception and distress caused by this phantom sensation. Based on studies performed within Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC), the investigators selected the medial geniculate body of the thalamus (MGB) as the most potential target to treat tinnitus with DBS.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
6
High frequency deep brain stimulation in the medial geniculate body of the thalamus.
MUMC+
Maastricht, Netherlands
Change over time of the score on the Tinnitus Functional Index
A validated questionnaire which assesses the impact of tinnitus on a patient measured on multiple time points to measure a change over time. The TFI score can range from 0-100, higher values indicate more tinnitus burden. When a patient scores 54 or higher the tinnitus is considered to be a major problem.
Time frame: Week 1, week 20, week 26, week 33, week 60
VAS Loudness
on a scale from 0 (no tinnitus) to 10 (most severe tinnitus imaginable), subjects rate their tinnitus perception on loudness.
Time frame: Week 1, week 12, week 20, week 26, week 33, week 60
VAS Burden
on a scale from 0 (no tinnitus) to 10 (most severe tinnitus imaginable), subjects rate their tinnitus perception amount of discomfort.
Time frame: Week 1, week 12, week 20, week 26, week 33, week 60
15 word memory test
Participants are given a list of 15 unrelated words repeated over five different trials and are asked to repeat. Another list of 15 unrelated words are given and the client must again repeat the original list of 15 words and then again after 30 minutes.
Time frame: Week 1, week 27, week 34, week 60
Boston naming test
The neurpsychologist shows the person each of the pictures, one at a time in the given order. The person is given 20 seconds to say what the drawing depicts.
Time frame: Week 1, week 27, week 34, week 60
Stroop Color and Word Test
This is a neuropsychological test used to assess the ability to inhibit cognitive interference that occurs when the processing of a specific stimulus feature impedes the simultaneous processing of a second stimulus attribute, well-known as the Stroop Effect.
Time frame: Week 1, week 27, week 34, week 60
Trail Making Test
This is a neuropsychological test of visual attention and task switching. It consists of two parts in which the subject is instructed to connect a set of 25 dots as quickly as possible while still maintaining accuracy.
Time frame: Week 1, week 27, week 34, week 60
Semantic Verbal Fluency Test (Animals)
This is a test in which participants have to produce as many words as possible from a category, here animals.
Time frame: Week 1, week 27, week 34, week 60
Semantic Verbal Fluency Test (Jobs)
This is a test in which participants have to produce as many words as possible from a category, here jobs.
Time frame: Week 1, week 27, week 34, week 60
Phonemic Verbal Fluency Test (D)
This is a test in which participants have to produce as many words as possible from a category, here words starting with the letter D.
Time frame: Week 1, week 27, week 34, week 60
Phonemic Verbal Fluency Test (A)
This is a test in which participants have to produce as many words as possible from a category, here words starting with the letter A.
Time frame: Week 1, week 27, week 34, week 60
Phonemic Verbal Fluency Test (T)
This is a test in which participants have to produce as many words as possible from a category, here words starting with the letter T.
Time frame: Week 1, week 27, week 34, week 60
Quality of life Questionnaire
The Short Form (36) Health Survey (standard validated questionnaire)
Time frame: Week 1, week 27, week 34, week 60
Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II)
Validated questionnaire for depression.
Time frame: Week 1, week 60
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Validated questionnaire for anxiety.
Time frame: Week 1, week 60
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Validated questionnaire for anxiety and depression.
Time frame: Week 1, week 60
Audiometry
pure-tone and speech audiometry. These are the clinical standard audiometric tests.
Time frame: Week 1, week 14, week 27, week 34, week 60
Auditory Brainstem Response
Neurophysiological measure following standard protocols.
Time frame: Week 1, week 14, week 27, week 34, week 60
Electroencephalography (EEG)
Neurophysiological measure following standard protocols.
Time frame: Week 1, week 14, week 27, week 34, week 60
Local Field Potentials (LFP)
Neurophysiological measure following standard protocols.
Time frame: Week 12
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.