The study determines the reliability and validity of the 6-Minute Walking Test (6MWT) in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD).
The purposes of the study is to assess the ability of the 6-Minute Walking Test (6MWT) as a reliable and standardized objective outcome assessment and its relation to already established subjective patient reported outcome measures in patients suffering from lumbar degenerative disc disease. We want to use an existing smartphone-application that uses global positioning system (GPS) coordinates to measure walking distance. Applying self- measurement of the 6MWT before and after a therapeutic intervention, we determine objective functional impairment (OFI) in patients. The results of this study add to the understanding of achievable objective outcomes after therapeutic interventions applied to patients with DDD and examines patients acceptance for smartphone based self-measurement. Primary Objectives The primary objective is to determine the reliability and validity of the 6-Minute Walking Test (6MWT) in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) Secondary objectives are 1. to correlate objective functional impairment (OFI) with already established patient-rated outcome measures (PROMs) in the sense of cross-validation. 2. To correlate OFI, as determined by the 6MWT with OFI that is determined by another objective test, the TUG test 3. to then analyze the change in OFI in patients before and after surgical intervention 4. to determine whether patients prefer the objective (6MWT) or subjective (PROMs) repeated assessment of their functional condition.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
50
Kantonsspital St. Gallen / Department of Neurosurgery
Sankt Gallen, Canton of St. Gallen, Switzerland
Raw walking distance
Raw walking distance (in m), as measured with the 6MWT, between the baseline- (before surgery) and follow-up assessment
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
TTFS
Difference in Time to First Symptoms (TTFS; in sec) as measured by the 6MWT, between the baseline- and follow-up assessment
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
DTFS
Difference in Distance to First Symptoms (DTFS, in m), as measured by the 6MWT, between the baseline- and follow-up assessment
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ)
Difference in PROM, as measured by the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ average score, range 0 (best) - 4,5 (worst), between the baseline- and follow-up assessment.
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI)
Difference in health-related quality of life (hrQoL), as measured by the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI average score, range 0 (best) - 10 (worst)), between the baseline- and follow-up assessment
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
TTFS/ZCQ baseline
Correlation of TTFS/DTFS in the 6MWT with the ZCQ score at baseline
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
TTFS/ZCQ follow-up
Correlation of TTFS in the 6MWT with the ZCQ score at follow-up
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
TTFS/COMI baseline
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Correlation of TTFS/DTFS in the 6MWT with the COMI score at baseline
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
TTFS/COMI follow-up
Correlation of TTFS/DTFS in the 6MWT with the COMI score at follow-up
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
TTFS/TUG baseline
Correlation of TTFS/DTFS in the 6MWT with the Timed up go Test (TUG) at baseline
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
TTFS/TUG follow-up
Correlation of TTFS/DTFS in the 6MWT with the TUG at follow-up
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Test-retest reliability of the 6MWT
Test-retest reliability of the 6MWT in patients with lumbar degenerate disc disease, tested two consecutive times with the 6MWT App (within 3 days) before as well as after surgery.
Time frame: 6 weeks to 1 day before surgery as well as 4-12 weeks after surgery