Effect of SGLT2i in Conjunction With the Artificial Pancreas on Improving the Glycemia in T1DM in the Outpatient Setting

Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital28 enrolled

Overview

The most advanced configurations of the Artificial Pancreas (AP) have not yet been demonstrated to sufficiently maximize time in target glycemia. One limitation is the challenge of postprandial glycemic control, which currently requires ongoing patient engagement for accurate and detailed bolus dose estimation for meals. Sodium Glucose Linked Transporter 2 Inhibition (SGLT2i) provides an additional mechanism to attenuate post-prandial glycemic excursion, and may represent a strategy that could further alleviate carbohydrate counting burden and improve the performance of AP configurations. This trial aims to compare - using a randomized, masked placebo-controlled, crossover, multicenter design - the efficacy of the SGLT2i empagliflozin 25 mg oral per day each in the setting of single-hormone automated AP and conventional insulin pump therapy on the proportion of time spent in target and in hypoglycemia each during a 4-week day-and-night period. The pilot trial aims to enroll 28 adult patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) across 2 research sites (one in Toronto and one in Montreal) and includes a 2- week therapy optimization run-in period, 4-weeks for each of the two AP intervention arms, and a 1- week washout in between the pharmacological intervention sequences. Glucose levels will be measured by continuous glucose monitoring (G5, Dexcom Inc.). Insulin will be infused using a subcutaneous infusion pump (t-slim, Tandem Diabetes Care) and communication between pumps and the algorithm will be implemented using Android Smartphone devices and Bluetooth technology communication.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

TRIPLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Signed and dated written informed consent by the date of Visit 1 in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and local legislation. 2. Males and females ≥ 18 years of age. 3. Clinical diagnosis of T1D for at least one year. The diagnosis of T1D is based on the investigator's clinical judgment; C peptide level and antibody determinations are not planned. 4. Insulin pump therapy use for at least 3 months. 5. HbA1c ≤ 10%. 6. eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m² as calculated by the CKD-EPI formula. 7. Women of child-bearing potential must be ready and able to use highly effective methods of birth control that result in a low failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Clinically significant nephropathy, neuropathy or retinopathy as judged by the investigator. 2. Recent (\< 6 months) acute macrovascular event e.g. acute coronary syndrome or cardiac surgery. 3. Renal insufficiency (characterized at eGFR below 60 mmol/l at the beginning of the trial) 4. History of pheochromocytoma or insulinoma 5. Beta-blockers at high dose (interference with glucose management). 6. Chronic acetaminophen treatment (can interfere with glucose sensor measurements). 7. Warfarin chronic treatment if INR monitoring cannot be evaluated (can increase the risk of bleeding). 8. Current use of other non-insulin adjunct anti-hyperglycemic drug or use within 30 days prior to screening. 9. Use of loop diuretics (e.g. furosemide, due to possible interference with study drug mechanism of action). 10. Ongoing or planned pregnancy or breastfeeding. 11. Severe hypoglycemic episode within one month prior to Visit 1. 12. Diabetic ketoacidosis in the last 3 months prior to Visit 1. 13. Current use of glucocorticoid medication except low stable dose and inhaled steroids (can interfere with glucose sensor measurements). 14. Known or suspected allergy to the trial products. 15. Other serious medical illness likely to interfere with study participation or with the ability to complete the trial by the judgment of the investigator. 16. Anticipating a significant change in exercise regimen between initiation of two intervention blocks (i.e. starting or stopping an organized sport). 17. Recent history of genital or urinary infection (\<1 month prior to Visit 1) or history of recurrent urinary tract infections. 18. Difficulty in using the artificial pancreas system following training.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Percentage of time spent in sensor glucose target range defined as between 3.9 and 7.8 mmol/L compared between 4- weeks AP on empagliflozin and 4-weeks AP with placebo

Percentage of time spent in sensor glucose target range defined as between 3.9 and 7.8 mmol/L compared between 4- weeks AP on empagliflozin and 4-weeks AP with placebo.

Time frame: 20 weeks

Percentage of time spent in sensor glucose target range defined as between 3.9 and 7.8 mmol/L compared between 4- weeks conventional pump therapy on empagliflozin and 4- weeks conventional pump therapy with placebo

Time frame: 20 weeks

Percentage of time spent in sensor glucose target range defined as between 3.9 and 7.8 mmol/L on 4- weeks automated AP on empagliflozin when compared to 4-weeks conventional pump therapy on empagliflozin

Time frame: 20 weeks

Percentage of time spent in sensor glucose target range defined as between 3.9 and 7.8 mmol/L on 4- weeks automated AP on empagliflozin when compared to 4-weeks conventional pump therapy with placebo

Time frame: 20 weeks

Secondary Outcomes

Percentage of time spent in sensor glucose target range defined as between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L compared between 4- weeks conventional pump therapy on empagliflozin and 4-weeks AP on empagliflozin

Time frame: 20 weeks

Percentage of time spent in sensor glucose target range defined as between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L compared between 4- weeks AP on empagliflozin and 4- weeks AP with placebo

Percentage of time spent in sensor glucose target range defined as between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L compared between 4- weeks AP on empagliflozin and 4- weeks AP with placebo.

Time frame: 20 weeks

Hypoglycemia: Percentage of time with glucose <3.9 mmol/L applied to each of the primary and secondary outcome comparator groups

Hypoglycemia: Percentage of time with glucose \<3.9 mmol/L applied to each of the primary and secondary outcome comparator groups.

Time frame: 20 weeks

Percentage of time spent in hypoglycemia, euglycemia and hyperglycemia

Percentage of time spent in the different glucose sensor levels characterized by amount spent between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L, 3.9 and 7.8 mmol/L, above 10.0 mmol/L, above 13.9 mmol/L, above 16.7 mmol/l, below 3.9 mmol/L, below 3.3 mmol/L, below 2.8 mmol/L

Time frame: 20 weeks

Absolute number of hypoglycemia events I.

Number of hypoglycemic events (\> 20 minutes) below 3.3 mmol/L based on sensor glucose levels

Time frame: 20 weeks

Absolute number of hypoglycemia events II.

Number of symptomatic hypoglycemic events \< 3.9 mmol/l or below 3.3 mmol/l without symptoms

Time frame: 20 weeks

Absolute number of hypoglycemia events III.

Number of treated hypoglycemic events

Time frame: 20 weeks

Statistical characteristics of glucose profile I.

Area under the curve of hypoglycemic glucose values (below 3.9 mmol/L, 3.3 mmol/L and 2.8 mmol/L)

Time frame: 20 weeks

Statistical characteristics of glucose profile II.

Standard deviation of glucose levels

Time frame: 20 weeks

Amount of total insulin delivery during interventions

Total insulin delivery measured by mean of units per day

Time frame: 20 weeks

Change in HbA1c

Change in HbA1c from baseline to after the first intervention and from the end of the first intervention to the end of the treatment period.

Time frame: 20 weeks

Mean fasting capillary ketone levels

Mean fasting capillary ketone levels.

Time frame: 20 weeks

Number of episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis

Time frame: 20 weeks

Number of technical adverse events

Number of events when algorithm crashes or needs to be overridden for safety reasons.

Time frame: 20 weeks

Effect of SGLT2i in Conjunction With the Artificial Pancreas on Improving the Glycemia in T1DM in the Outpatient Setting

Overview

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Locations (2)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes