The purpose of the study was to compare sequential fluoroscopy guidance with spiral guidance in terms of safety (number of major complications), effectiveness (number of targets reached), speed (procedural time) and radiation (DLP) in interventional chest-abdomen-pelvic procedures.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
385
Not applicable, all patients with indication of interventional percutaneous diagnostic or therapeutic chest-abdomen-pelvic procedure under CT control on a period of 1 year will be taken into account
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
Besançon, France
number of major complications
Comparison between the 2 groups
Time frame: All patients with indication of interventional percutaneous diagnostic or therapeutic chest-abdomen-pelvic procedure under CT control performed on a period of 1 year will be taken into account
number of targets reached
Comparison between the 2 groups
Time frame: All patients with indication of interventional percutaneous diagnostic or therapeutic chest-abdomen-pelvic procedure under CT control performed on a period of 1 year will be taken into account
Dose Length Product (DLP)
Comparison between the 2 groups
Time frame: All patients with indication of interventional percutaneous diagnostic or therapeutic chest-abdomen-pelvic procedure under CT control performed on a period of 1 year will be taken into account
number of controls required to place the needle
Comparison between the 2 groups
Time frame: All patients with indication of interventional percutaneous diagnostic or therapeutic chest-abdomen-pelvic procedure under CT control performed on a period of 1 year will be taken into account
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.