Nearly half of all adult women suffer with Urinary incontinence (UI), this is more common in athletes. UI is considered to be due to weak pelvic floor muscles. Standard advice encourages strength and endurance training; however, assessment of pelvic floor muscles can sometimes reveal overactive or tight tissues. Evidence suggests athletes have stronger pelvic floors than non-athletes. If the pelvic floor is overactive, general advice regarding pelvic floor strengthening will not improve UI, and may make it worse. This study will explore the feasibility of conducting a larger trial to identify cost effectiveness and benefits of treating athletes with physiotherapy and how this might differ from current practice. 15 -20 athletic women will complete questionnaires regarding their UI and its effects on them. They will receive physiotherapy; the assessment will include a history and internal examination of their pelvic floor. This will inform a tailored rehabilitation program. Interviews will be conducted with some of these women to explore their response to the intervention. Interviews with health professionals will establish current practice for this patient group. The results will tell us how likely it is for athletes to volunteer and take part in a future study and which outcomes are useful.
Aims: The investigator's overall purpose is to conduct an RCT to determine whether one to one physiotherapy can improve the symptoms of urinary incontinence (UI) in a group of athletic women. This feasibility study will enable us to ascertain the viability of conducting a definitive appropriately powered trial. Research protocol: The research design is a mixed methods study with three distinct but related phases. Phase 1: 6-8 local health care professionals (GPs, nurses and physiotherapists) will be recruited for interview to explore current management practices of urinary incontinence (UI) in primary care. Phase 2: 15-20 sporting or athletic women who self- report symptoms of UI will be recruited from the local sporting community. Each will undergo individual subjective and objective assessments in order to establish history, symptoms and pelvic floor muscle function. The intervention will be then be tailored from these assessments and agreed between each individual and the specialist physiotherapist. It will include guided exercise within the clinic and a regular home exercise plan, in keeping with typical pelvic health regimes for pelvic floor muscle (PFM) dysfunction. Phase 3: 6-8 participants from phase 2 will be invited to take part in a qualitative interview in order to gain more in-depth understanding of UI. Purposeful selection will account for age, sporting activity and severity of symptoms. The interviews will be to explore the effects of UI on their quality of life, their participation in sport and exercise and the acceptability of the intervention. Measurable end points: 6 months from recruitment of the last participant in phase 2 will be considered to be the end point of the study.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
19
Semi-structured interviews of health care professionals to explore current management of urinary incontinence in the community
Tailored physiotherapy assessment and management for athletic women who self-report urinary incontinence
Semi-structured interviews of a purposeful selection of the participants from Phase 2 to explore reaction to the recruitment process and the intervention
University of Nottingham
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom
Recruitment rate
Ease of recruiting participants directly from gyms and sports clubs
Time frame: Up to 8 Months
Attrition rate
The number of participants who consent to participate that remain in the study
Time frame: 6 months after the participant's first assessment
Acceptability of the intervention: % that give positive feedback from the interviews
Measured as the % that give positive feedback from the interviews in Phase 3
Time frame: Up to 9 months
Acceptability of the secondary outcome measures used in Phase 2: % positive feedback for each outcome measure from the interviews
Measured as the % positive feedback for each outcome measure from the interviews in Phase 3
Time frame: Up to 9 months
Timescale required for intervention
The time required for a successful intervention. This will be measured by the change in the secondary outcome measures between the three month assessment and the six months assessment
Time frame: Six months for each participant from the first assessment
Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI) 6
A short questionnaire to evaluate 'bother' of urinary symptoms (6 questions) mean score x 33.3 to give a final score out of 100. Where 100 indicates the most severe urinary distress
Time frame: Six months from the first assessment for each participant
International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Long Form Module (ICIQ-FLUTS-LF)
A long quality of life and descriptive questionnaire to establish type and severity of urinary symptoms and the impact of these on quality of life (Two scores: urinary symptoms max score 69 where this is indicates the most severe; quality of life score, where the maximum score is 150, where urinary symptoms are having the maximum negative impact on quality of life
Time frame: Six months from the first assessment for each participant
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.