The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and credibility of a mindfulness-based dance/movement therapy (M-DMT) protocol that is delivered online; to assess and improve methodological procedures for conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) test of M-DMT; and to demonstrate proof of principle by gathering information about the process of change between M-DMT and a control condition. This is the first study to address the potential of M-DMT as a creative, non-opioid intervention for chronic back pain. Therefore, the findings of this study will provide important methodological and protocol data and substantive pilot data necessary for the next phase of this line of research, namely a fully powered RCT to evaluate efficacy and treatment mechanisms of action. Data obtained as part of this study will be instrumental for informing the systematic evaluation of M-DMT for chronic back pain care.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
64
M-DMT includes benefits of physical activity, group psychotherapy, mindfulness training, and an art-based intervention in a unified practice. Each online session focuses on different psycho-educational topics about chronic low back pain management and links these topics with specific M-DMT activities that incorporate mindfulness-based principles and techniques.
The therapist will facilitate online open group discussions about participants' experiences with or reactions to the topic of discussion and will promote empathy among group members. The therapist will use client-centered, reflective listening techniques but will not prescribe any specific recommendations for change. Each week, SSG participants will receive emails with brief information about the topic discussed during the group session.
Drexel Universitsy
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
RECRUITINGFeasibility of Recruitment: Number of participants eligible
Number of participants eligible for randomization to the study intervention
Time frame: Baseline
Recruitment Rate
Proportion of participants randomized relative to total trial referrals
Time frame: Baseline
Recruitment time
Number of participate enrolled per month
Time frame: Baseline
Feasibility of recruiting male participants: Proportion of male participant enrolled
Proportion of male participant enrolled to the study
Time frame: Baseline
Treatment Completion Rate
We expect 80% of participants to complete at least 9/12 M-DMT sessions
Time frame: 12 weeks following receipt of treatment
Retention Rate
Proportion of participants who complete follow-up questionnaires
Time frame: 24 weeks
Reason for withdrawal
Assessed by an open-ended question, "What was the reason for discontinuing your participation?" administered by a study staff during a phone interview
Time frame: 12 weeks following receipt of treatment
M-DMT intervention credibility and expectancy
Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (range 3-27; higher scores reflect greater treatment expectancy and rationale credibility)
Time frame: 1 week
Treatment Fidelity
Treatment fidelity assessment form developed by the researcher (range: varies between sessions depending on the number of items included in the particular session; A total score of 80% and higher reflects adequate treatment fidelity)
Time frame: 1-12 weeks
Treatment satisfaction and acceptability: Likert-scale survey
via Likert-scale surveys; on scale of 1 to 5, 1 being not satisfied; 5 being very satisfied (i.e higher number, better outcome).
Time frame: 12 weeks post-randomization
M-DMT intervention acceptability
Exit interview based on an interview protocol developed by the researcher
Time frame: 12 weeks
Adverse Event
Number of adverse events
Time frame: 1 -12 weeks
Pain intensity: PROMIS® Pain Intensity-Short Form (SF)3a
PROMIS® Pain Intensity-Short Form (SF)3a (A 5-point (from 1= Had no pain to 5= Very Severe) rating scale is used in each of the 3 items; higher results mean higher intensity of pain.
Time frame: Change from Baseline pain intensity at 6, 12, and 24-week time points
Pain interference: PROMIS® Pain Interference -8a
PROMIS® Pain Interference -8a (A 5-point (from 1= Not at all to 5= Very much) rating scale is used on each of the 8 items; higher scores reflect greater pain interference
Time frame: Change from Baseline pain interference at 6, 12, and 24-week time points
Chronic pain acceptance: Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire
Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (A seven-point (from 0= Never to 6 = Always) rating scale is used in each of the 20 items; higher results mean high pain acceptance)
Time frame: Change from Baseline chronic pain acceptance at 6, 12, and 24-week time points
Mindfulness
Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (A 4-point (Rarely/not at all to almost always) rating scale is used in each of the 12 items; higher values reflect higher mindful qualities
Time frame: Change from Baseline mindfulness at 6, 12, and 24-week time points
Physical activity (Accelerometry data)
An accelerometer, ActiGraph GT9X will be used to measure the change in participants physical activity between baseline and 2 endpoints (12 and 24 weeks)
Time frame: Change from Baseline physical activity at 12, and 24-week time points
Physical activity (Self-report data)
Self-report assessment of physical activity will be done through UCLA Activity Scale (One item out of 10 will be checked to best describe current activity level)
Time frame: Change from Baseline physical activity at 6, 12, and 24-week time points
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.