The aim of this study is to compare the effects of a strategy aimed at increasing alveolar recruitment (high PEEP levels adjusted according to driving pressure and recruitment maneuvers) with that of a strategy aimed at minimizing alveolar distension (low PEEP level without recruitment maneuver) on postoperative respiratory failure and mortality in patients receiving low VT ventilation during emergency abdominal surgery.
Emergency abdominal surgery is associated with a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are the second most common surgical complication and adversely influence surgical morbidity. Postoperative respiratory failure (PRF) is one of the most serious pulmonary complication. Two hypotheses can be forward by the literature. First, a low VT lung protective ventilation in combination with a strategy aimed at minimizing alveolar distension by using low PEEP level (and without recruitment maneuver) could improve postoperative outcome while reducing the risk of hemodynamic alterations or, second, could increase the risk of PRF compared with a strategy aimed at increasing alveolar recruitment using higher PEEP level adjusted according to driving pressure in combination with recruitment maneuvers in adult patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. Given the uncertainties, and in order to determine the impact of lung protective ventilation strategies on clinical outcomes of high-risk surgical patients, a randomized trial is needed. Our primary hypothesis is that, during low VT ventilation, a strategy aimed at increasing alveolar recruitment by using high PEEP levels adjusted according to driving pressure in combination with recruitment maneuvers could be more effective at reducing PRF and mortality after emergency abdominal surgery than a strategy aimed at minimizing alveolar distension by using lower PEEP without recruitment maneuver. Given the number of patients for whom the question applies, the prevalence and the burden of PPCs, the study can have significant clinical importance and public health implications.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
707
Patients will receive PEEP levels individually set at the highest possible value (up to 15 cmH2O) providing a driving pressure (airway plateau pressure minus PEEP) lower than 13 cmH2O, in addition to recruitment maneuvers.
Patients will receive a PEEP level ≤5 cmH2O without recruitment maneuvers
University hospital
Angers, France
Hospital
Annecy, France
University hospital
Besançon, France
University Hospital
Bordeaux, France
Hospital
Chalon-sur-Saône, France
University hospital
Clermont-Ferrand, France
University hospital
Dijon, France
University hospital
Grenoble, France
University hospital
Le Mans, France
University hospital
Lille, France
...and 18 more locations
Postoperative respiratory failure
Composite criteria : 1. \- Failure to wean from the ventilator after surgery (Yes or No) 2. \- Requiring unplanned reintubation (Yes or No) 3. \- Curative non-invasive ventilation once extubated postoperatively (Yes or No) 4. \- Death (all cause of mortality) (Yes or No) If at least one of these 4 criteria is answered yes, the composite criterion (i.e. the primary outcome) will be answered yes
Time frame: Hospital discharge - Up to day 30
Postoperative pulmonary complications
Hypoxemia, pneumonia? development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
Time frame: Day 30
Postoperative extra-pulmonary complications
sepsis and septic shock, renal dysfunction
Time frame: Day 30
SOFA
Sequential-related Organ Failure Assessment
Time frame: Day 1
SOFA
Sequential-related Organ Failure Assessment
Time frame: Day 2
SOFA
Sequential-related Organ Failure Assessment
Time frame: Day 3
SOFA
Sequential-related Organ Failure Assessment
Time frame: Day 4
SOFA
Sequential-related Organ Failure Assessment
Time frame: Day 5
SOFA
Sequential-related Organ Failure Assessment
Time frame: Day 6
SOFA
Sequential-related Organ Failure Assessment
Time frame: Day 7
Ventilator-free days
The number of days alive and with unassisted breathing
Time frame: Day 30
Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation
Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation from randomization to first tracheal extubation
Time frame: Up to Day 30
Total duration of mechanical ventilation
Total duration of mechanical ventilation (additive, for all épisodes)
Time frame: Up to Day 30
Time to successful tracheal extubation
Absence of ventilatory support during the first 48 hours after extubation
Time frame: 48 hours
Total volume of intraoperative fluids
Total volume of intraoperative fluids (crystalloids and colloids)
Time frame: Day 1
Median norepinephrine doses during surgery
µg/kg/min
Time frame: Day 1
Median phenylephrine doses during surgery
µg/kg/min
Time frame: Day 1
Median ephedrine doses during surgery
µg/kg/min
Time frame: Day 1
Intensive care unit (ICU)-free days
Intensive care unit (ICU)-free days
Time frame: Day 30
Duration of ICU stay
Duration of ICU stay
Time frame: Up to day 90
Duration of hospital stay
Duration of hospital stay
Time frame: Up to day 90
All-cause mortality
All-cause mortality
Time frame: Day 30
All-cause mortality
All-cause mortality
Time frame: Day 90
Time to death
Time to death (Days)
Time frame: Up to 90 days
Hemodynamic instability
Hemodynamic instability ventilatory-related defined as a drop of arterial systolic pressure below 80 mmHg for more than 5 minutes not responding to treatment
Time frame: Up to day 30
Pneumothorax
Pneumothorax ventilatory-related
Time frame: Up to day 30
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.