Translational Research in Pelvic Pain

University of Oxford787 enrolled

Overview

This study aims to better understand the pathways leading to pain in women with two types of pelvic pain condition (endometriosis-associated pain and bladder pain syndrome) and determine whether these pathways can be used to subgroup patients.

Chronic pelvic pain is as common as asthma, migraine and back pain and has a very significant impact on quality of life. However, it is still poorly understood and the available treatments are limited and often not successful. This project focuses on two causes of chronic pelvic pain: endometriosis and interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. Endometriosis (the presence of tissue resembling the lining of the womb outside of the womb) is very common, affecting \~1 in 10 women, and is associated with often disabling pelvic pain symptoms including painful periods, pain throughout the month, and pain associated with sex, passing urine and opening bowels. Interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome is much less common but dramatically reduces quality of life with many women planning their day around trips to the toilet. This multi-centre study will be carried out at 3 sites in Europe and 1 in the U.S.. Rather than focusing on the pelvis, the investigators will approach these conditions in the context of other chronic pain conditions with which they share many features and thus consider the many different systems that might contribute to generating and maintaining pain. The investigators will combine detailed clinical and questionnaire data with tests of the function of a variety of systems (including nerve function, stress response and psychology) and the results of analyses of different body fluids and tissues (including blood, urine, endometriosis lesions). No study treatment or intervention will be given during TRiPP. The aim is to identify pathways responsible for pain in these women and determine whether they can be divided into subgroups on the basis of different pain pathways that might therefore respond to different treatments. Ultimately the investigators hope to identify new targets for treatment and contribute to the design of more personalised treatment plans.

Study Type

OBSERVATIONAL

Enrollment

787

Conditions

Endometriosis Bladder Pain Syndrome Chronic Pain

Eligibility

Sex: FEMALEMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 50 YearsHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Female, aged 18 - 50 years. * Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study. * EAP/EABP/CON: previously enrolled in EndOX or BCE cohorts with consent to be contacted again. * EAP: Surgical diagnosis of endometriosis; at least one pelvic pain \>3/10. * EABP: Surgical diagnosis of endometriosis; at least one pelvic pain \>3/10; pain perceived by the patient as arising from the bladder AND from other area(s) of the pelvis; at least one urinary symptom (e.g. urge, frequency). * BPS: fulfil ESSIC criteria (Pelvic pain, pressure or discomfort for greater than 6 months, perceived to be related to the urinary bladder accompanied by at least one other urinary symptom like persistent urge to void or frequency). Exclusion Criteria: * Female participant who is pregnant, lactating or planning pregnancy during the course of the study. * Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the trial, or may influence the result of the trial, or the participant's ability to participate in the trial. * EAP: pain perceived by the patient as arising from the bladder; urinary symptoms (e.g. urge, frequency). * CON: previous diagnosis of endometriosis; pelvic pain or dysmenorrhoea (NRS\>3/10) * BPS: previous diagnosis of endometriosis. Additionally, for physiological testing: Exclusion: • Participants who have participated in another research trial involving an investigational product in the past 12 weeks. And for fMRI: Inclusion: • fMRI compatible. Exclusion: * Contraindication to fMRI scan i.e. metallic implants, stents, clips, weight greater than acceptable for local fMRI scanner etc. * Use of centrally acting drugs in the previous 3 months (e.g. anti-epileptics, anti-depressants, anxiolytics, gabapentin, pregabalin, duloxetine). N.B. Regular use of standard analgesics including opiates is not an exclusion criterion, however, women will be asked to refrain from taking such drugs for 8 hours prior to their brain scan if at all possible.

Locations (2)

IBMC

Porto, Portugal

University of Oxford

Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)

QST of the dorsal of the foot and midline lower abdomen according to the German Neuropathic Pain Network Protocol.

Time frame: 1 year

Presence of abdominal wall muscle tenderness

Assessment of the abdominal wall specifically looking for muscle tenderness according to a standardised protocol (an enhanced Carnetts test as described by Scheltinga and Roumen 2017). Subjects will be categorised into muscle tenderness present or absent.

Time frame: 1 year

Change of pressure pain threshold (PPT)

A standardised conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigm will be used to investigate the change in pressure pain threshold on the dorsum of the foot. An ischaemic stimulus to the contralateral arm will be used as the conditioned stimulus. The foot PPT will be measured before the conditioned stimulus and immediately after. The change will be reported as the (PPTbefore - PPTafter).

Time frame: 1 year

Area under the curve (AUC) of single day salivary cortisol profile

Saliva will be collected at home at the specified times allowing a daily AUC of salivary cortisol for each subject to be calculated. Collection times: waking; 30-45 minutes after waking; before lunch; before dinner; bedtime.

Time frame: 1 year

Change in salivary cortisol

A saliva sample will be collected at rest immediately before the CPM paradigm described in outcome 3 and then again immediately after. The ischaemic pain stimulus used as the conditioning stimulus in this paradigm is the most noxious component of the physiological testing paradigms used in this study and therefore the most likely to generate a stress response. The change will be reported as Cortisol(before)-Cortisol(after).

Time frame: Saliva collected immediately before and immediately after CPM paradigm (outcome 3).

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.

Secondary Outcomes

Metabolomic data

Discovery study of levels of all known metabolite in plasma using an established validated proprietary tool designed by Metabolon (https://www.metabolon.com).

Time frame: Baseline

Proteomic data

Study measuring levels of proteins detected on two panels (inflammation and neurological) as designed by OLink (https://www.olink.com).

Time frame: Baseline

Transcriptomic data

Discovery transcriptomic analysis of matched eutopic and ectopic endometrium from endometriosis and control women will be performed on a subgroup of participants. Both descriptive data and pathway analysis will be performed.

Time frame: Baseline

Comorbidities

Assessed with the complex medical symptoms inventory (CMSI). The CMSI contains a 41 item symptom screener, which an increasing score on adds up to a higher functional somatic burden (scores range from 0-41). Additionally, clusters of symptoms point to specific diagnoses for which the full diagnostic criteria questions are provided allowing the commonest overlapping pain conditions to be screened for: Fibromyalgia temporomandibular disorders irritable bowel syndrome chronic tension type headache migraine chronic low back pain myalgic encephalitis/chronic fatigue syndrome interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome endometriosis vulvodynia

Time frame: Baseline

Past trauma

Assessed with the Childhood Traumatic Events Scale (CTES). Scores range from 0 - 42 with higher scores representing more experience of early trauma. No sub scales will be derived.

Time frame: Baseline

Recent trauma

Assessed with the Recent Traumatic Events Scale (RTES). Scores range from 0 - 42 with higher scores representing more experience of recent trauma. No sub scales will be derived.

Time frame: Baseline