The proposed study is to test and validate a novel intervention that integrates computerized cognitive training with real-time neuromonitoring and neurofeedback to enhance working memory by probing the individualized neural systems underlying working memory. We will test the proposed intervention on children with ADHD with working memory deficits. The R61 proof-of-concept phase will assess the target engagement, effective dose and feasibility.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
65
The Neurofeedback group will receive the proposed intervention which integrates computerized working memory training with neuromonitoring and neurofeedback.
The Cognitive training group will receive computerized working memory training with performance feedback.
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, California, United States
Change in Target Frontal-parietal Activity
Change in activity in the target frontal-parietal network measured by functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) during an N-back working memory task. A general linear model is applied to recorded signal and the beta coefficients from the model are extracted as a proxy for brain activity in fronto-pariteal network which subserves working memory function. There is no established population mean for beta coefficient of brain activity. Higher (lower) beta coefficients reflect higher (lower) activation in the target brain network. A positive change indicates increased brain activity. Increased frontal-parietal activity reflects better engagement of this brain network during working memory performance.
Time frame: baseline and 6 weeks
Change in Working Memory Performance
Accuracy in an N-back working memory task was calculated as the percentage of correct responses to target stimuli.
Time frame: baseline and 6 weeks
Change in Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF), Working Memory T-score
BRIEF assesses everyday behavior associated with specific domains of the executive functions. BRIEF working memory T-score ranges from \<30 to \>100 with higher scores indicating larger impairment in working memory. Lower T-scores on BRIEF indicates better working memory. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. BRIEF working memory T-score of 65 and higher is indicative of deficits in working memory.
Time frame: baseline and 6 weeks
Change in Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning 2 (WRAML-2), General Memory Index Score
WRAML-2 assesses clinical issues in learning and memory functions. WRAML-2 Working Memory Index score ranges from 50 to 150 with higher scores indicating better working memory performance
Time frame: baseline and 6 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Change in Conners 3rd Edition ADHD Index Score
Conners 3 will be used to measure changes in clinical ADHD symptoms. Conners 3 ADHD index score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating elevated ADHD symptoms. Conners 3 ADHD index score of higher than 65 is indicative of ADHD diagnosis.
Time frame: baseline and 6 weeks
Change in Conners 3rd Edition Inattention T-score
Conners 3 will be used to measure changes in clinical inattention symptoms. Conners 3 inattention t-score ranges from \<30 to \>100 with higher scores indicating larger impairment in attention. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Inattention t-score of 65 and higher is indicative of deficits in attention.
Time frame: baseline and 6 weeks
Change in Developmental NEuroPSYchological Assessment II (NEPSY-II) Composite Score
NEPSY-II consists of a set of subtests measuring cognitive functions required for success in school. The subtests include auditory attention \& response, inhibition, word-list interference, and comprehension of instructions. The composite scores were quantified by averaging the scores across sub-scales. A positive change in composite score suggests increased ability in subtest domains. The composite score below 8 suggest deficits. The composite scores range from 0 to 20; lower scores correspond to more deficits, and higher scores correspond to more abilities.
Time frame: baseline and 6 weeks