The objective of this retrospective/prospective enrollment and prospective follow-up consecutive series PMCF study is to collect data confirming safety, performance and clinical benefits of the Comprehensive Primary Micro Stem and Comprehensive Anatomic Versa-Dial Titanium Humeral Heads when used for primary and revision total shoulder arthroplasty (implants and instrumentation) at 1,3,5,7 and 10 years\*. Comprehensive Primary Micro Stem and Comprehensive Anatomic Versa-Dial Titanium Humeral Heads have been on the market since 2007, but have insufficient data to support 10 years of clinical history. Therefore, a prospective aspect to the study will be utilized in order to collect long-term data.
The objective of this retrospective/prospective enrollment and prospective follow-up consecutive series PMCF study is to collect data confirming safety, performance and clinical benefits of the Comprehensive Primary Micro Stem and Comprehensive Anatomic Versa-Dial Titanium Humeral Heads when used for primary and revision total shoulder arthroplasty (implants and instrumentation) at 1,2,3,5,7 and 10 years\*. Comprehensive Primary Micro Stem and Comprehensive Anatomic Versa-Dial Titanium Humeral Heads have been on the market since 2007, but have insufficient data to support 10 years of clinical history. Therefore, a prospective aspect to the study will be utilized in order to collect long-term data. The primary objective of this study is the assessment of safety by analyzing implant survivorship. This will be established by recording the incidence and frequency of revisions, complications, and adverse events. Relation of the events to either implant or instrumentation should be specified. The secondary objective is the assessment of performance and clinical benefits by recording patient-reported clinical outcomes measures (PROMs). \*The most recent available data will be used. If any of the listed time points are not available, data will be used from last available time point and follow-up will move forward at the closest available time point.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
146
Patients that have been implanted with the Comprehensive Primary Micro Stem to repair shoulder malfunction/disease.
Patients that have been implanted with the Comprehensive Anatomic Versa-Dial Titanium Humeral head to repair shoulder malfunction/disease.
Shoulder Clinic of Idaho
Boise, Idaho, United States
Beaumont Health
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, United States
Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation The Larner College of Medicine at The University of Vermont
Burlington, Vermont, United States
Device Safety assessed through the frequency and incidence of revisions, complications and Adverse Events
The primary objective of this study is the assessment of safety by analyzing implant survivorship. This will be established by recording the incidence and frequency of revisions, complications, and adverse events. Relation of the events to either implant or instrumentation should be specified.
Time frame: Out to 10 years
Device Performance and Benefits evaluated through the Oxford Shoulder Score outcome measure.
The secondary objective is the assessment of performance and clinical benefits by recording patient-reported clinical outcomes measures (PROMs), through the use of the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). The OSS is a 12 item questionnaire, each with 5 potential answers. Patients rate their symptoms from 1 (minimal symptoms) to 5 (severe symptoms). The combined total gives a minimum score of 12 and a maximum of 60. Higher scores in the OSS imply worse functionality.
Time frame: Out to 10 years
Device Performance and Benefits evaluated through the Patient Assessment Questionnaire.
The secondary objective is the assessment of performance and clinical benefits by recording patient-reported clinical outcomes measures (PROMs), through the use of the Patient Assessment Questionnaire where adverse events and/or complications (yes or no), patient's activity level with regard to operative side, based on the UCLA Activity Score(wholly inactive 10, mostly inactive 9, sometimes participates in mild activities 8, regularly participates in mild activities 7, sometimes participates in moderate activities 6, regularly participates in moderate activities 5, regularly participates in active events 4, regularly participates in very active events 3, sometimes participates in impact sports 2, regularly participates in impact sports 1, or not recorded), and the Reported Score if Individual Scores are not available of the Oxford Shoulder Score. The UCLA Activity score rating is from 10 being the best outcome score, and 1 being the worst.
Time frame: Out to 10 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.