The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pemigatinib plus pembrolizumab or pemigatinib alone versus the standard of care for participants with metastatic or unresectable urothelial carcinoma who are not eligible to receive cisplatin, are harboring FGFR3 mutation or rearrangement, and who have not received prior treatment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
7
13.5 mg once a day orally
200 mg Q3W intravenously
1000 mg/m\^2 IV over 30 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time from the randomization date until the date of disease progression (as measured by a blinded independent central review \[BICR\] per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 \[RECIST v1.1\]) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.
Time frame: up to 130 days
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause.
Time frame: up to 225 days
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR was defined as the proportion of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST v1.1 (as measured by BICR).
Time frame: up to 148 days
Duration of Response (DOR)
DOR was defined as the time from the date of the first assessment of CR or PR until the date of the first disease progression (per RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first (as measured by BICR).
Time frame: up to 148 days
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
A treatment-emergent adverse event was defined as an adverse event that was either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study drug until 30 days after the last dose of study drug.
Time frame: up to 178 days
EORTC QLQ-C30 Score
The European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) contains 30 items and measures 5 functional dimensions (i.e., physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social), 3 symptom items (i.e., fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), 6 single items (i.e., dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial impact), and a global health and quality of life scale. For each scale and single item, a linear transformation was applied to standardize the scores between 0 (worst) and 100 (best) as described in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Dosed to target AUC of 5 mg/mL/min or 4.5 mg/mL/min if required per local guidelines on Day 1 or 2 of each 3-week cycle
Marin Cancer Care
Greenbrae, California, United States
Christiana Care Helen F. Graham Cancer Center
Newark, Delaware, United States
Cotton-O'Neil Clinical Research Center, Hematology & Oncology
Marietta, Georgia, United States
Simmons Cancer Institute At Siu
Springfield, Illinois, United States
The University of Kansas Cancer Center
Westwood, Kansas, United States
Smhc Cancer Blood Disorders
Biddeford, Maine, United States
Summit Medical Group
Florham Park, New Jersey, United States
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
New York, New York, United States
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, United States
Charleston Hematology Oncology Associates
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
...and 69 more locations
Time frame: up to 160 days
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Score
The European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) contains 30 items and measures 5 functional dimensions (i.e., physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social), 3 symptom items (i.e., fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), 6 single items (i.e., dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial impact), and a global health and quality of life scale. For each scale and single item, a linear transformation was applied to standardize the scores between 0 (worst) and 100 (best) as described in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline; up to 160 days
Number of Participants With the Indicated EQ-5D-5L Dimension Scores
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system is composed of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-case, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 5 response levels, which are coded by single-digit numbers: 1 = no problems, 2 = slight problems, 3 = moderate problems, 4 = severe problems, 5 = unable to/extreme problems. The EQ-5D-5L also includes a graded (0 \[worst overall health\] to 100 \[best overall health\]) vertical visual analog scale that provides a quantitative measure of the participant's perception of their overall health.
Time frame: up to 160 days
Change From Baseline in the EQ-5D-5L EQ Visual Analog Scale Score
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system is composed of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-case, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 5 response levels, which are coded by single-digit numbers: 1 = no problems, 2 = slight problems, 3 = moderate problems, 4 = severe problems, 5 = unable to/extreme problems. The EQ-5D-5L also includes a graded (0 \[worst overall health\] to 100 \[best overall health\]) vertical visual analog scale that provides a quantitative measure of the participant's perception of their overall health.
Time frame: Baseline; up to 160 days