In order to assess the rate and mode of failure cases observed in patients with distal femur fractures treated with a distal femur plates, anonymized radiographs from those patients will be collected retrospectively. All available images will reviewed by an expert review board in regards to fracture classification, implant and surgery details, quality of initial reduction and plate positioning as well as the occurrence of mechanical complications and the outcome in terms of fracture healing (if available). Additionally, age and gender as basic demographical data will be collected in a de-identified way..
Severely comminuted distal femur fractures can be challenging injuries and usually require surgical treatment with lateral distal plate osteosynthesis. Anatomically pre-contoured locking plates are commonly used. In 2012, the 4.5mm VA-LCP Curved Condylar Plate for distal femur fractures (VA-LCP DF, Synthes) was introduced offering the option of axis variation of the locking screws. Recently, a report highlighted cases of implant failure with this implant, cautioning practicing surgeons against the use of this implant in certain type of AO/OTA fracture and dislocation classification 33 fractures (AO/OTA classification). Based on this report, the current study was designed to perform a retrospective in-depth radiological analysis of all cases distal femur fractures of 4 participating sites in which the VA-LCP DF, the LCP Distal Femur Plate (LCP DF, Synthes) or the 'less invasive stabilization system' for distal femur fractures (LISS DF, Synthes) were used for fracture stabilization. The radiological in-depth analysis will be done by an expert review board with the aim to identify potential causes and risk factors for the failure cases among all cases collected. This evaluation will contribute to a better understanding of the mechanical performance of distal femur fracture plates and the causes and risk factors for failures.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
100
By assessing the rate and mode of mechanical failures we aim to identify risk factors for mechanical failures among the analysed plate types. This, finally, is depending on the overall number of cases and number of failure cases.
University of California
Sacramento, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Houston, Texas, United States
Inova Orthopedics
Fairfax, Virginia, United States
Kantonsspital Liestal
Liestal, Basel-Landschaft, Switzerland
Kantonsspital Graubünden
Chur, Kanton Graubünden, Switzerland
Fracture
type of fracture
Time frame: baseline
Fracture classification
AO/OTA classification 33A, -B or C
Time frame: baseline
Mechanism of injury
High energy trauma (H) or low energy trauma assessed as H for high and L for low energy trauma
Time frame: baseline
Implant used
Implant manufacturer name (VA-LCP DF, LISS DF, LCP DF)
Time frame: baseline
Open or closed fracture
G-A class: Y=open, N=closed
Time frame: 1 year
Bone union in time
weeks to bone union
Time frame: baseline until 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.