Older adults with chronic low back pain (LBP) are at a greater risk for disability, loss of independence, and lower quality of life. Experts agree that LBP is not a homogeneous condition, and treatments should differ based upon clinical presentation. Our past work indicates that all of these hip and lumbar spine impairments may contribute to worse physical function and greater disability, but the relative importance of each impairment is unclear. Thus, clinicians have limited evidence to draw on for treatment decisions for this patient population. We have identified a vulnerable subgroup of older adults with hip and low back pain. The purpose of this study is to randomize participants into one of two treatment arms and analyze the outcomes.
This randomized clinical trial is designed to explore two different interventions: one that addresses these hip issues (hip-focused) and one that focuses more directly on the lumbar spine (spine-focused). We aim to recruit a sample of 180 older adults who have chronic LBP and hip impairments (i.e. pain and muscle weakness). To ensure our findings are generalizable, the study will be conducted across three sites in different geographical regions: University of Delaware, University of Pittsburgh, and Duke University. The goal of this clinical trial is to learn more about how older adults with low back and hip pain respond to physical therapy intervention. Participants will have three standardized assessments by licensed physical therapists, at baseline, 8 weeks, and 6 months. Once randomized, participants will attend on-site sessions 2x per week for 8 weeks and complete a home exercise log. People in the hip-focused group will receive mobilizations and stretching, and will participate in hip exercises and trunk muscle exercise. People in the spine-focused group will receive massage and gentle mobilizations to the lumbar spine and participate in stationary cycling and trunk muscle training.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
184
The hip-focused intervention includes a blend of hip-focused rehabilitative techniques and some basic lumbar spine-directed techniques. The hip-focused arm includes tailored manual therapy, progressive strengthening exercises, and flexibility exercises for the hip, as well as spinal flexibility and trunk muscle training exercises. The intervention will be delivered by licensed physical therapists in one-hour sessions, twice per week, for 8 weeks.
The spine-focused rehabilitation intervention is a direct and comprehensive lumbar spine rehabilitative program, but it does not include hip treatment. The spine-focused arm includes spinal manual therapy, spinal flexibility exercises, and trunk muscle training exercises. The intervention will be delivered by licensed physical therapists in one-hour sessions, twice per week, for 8 weeks.
University of Delaware
Newark, Delaware, United States
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, United States
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale
A 20-item questionnaire that assesses limitations in daily activities due to back pain. Scores can range from 0-100% with higher scores indicating greater back pain-related disability.
Time frame: Baseline to 8-week assessment (i.e. post-intervention)
10-Meter Walk Test at Self-Selected Speed (10MWT)
A performance test where participants walk along a 10-meter linear pathway at their 'usual pace' for three trials. Average self-selected gait speed is determined over the central 6 meters of the course in meters/second. Faster walking speeds indicate better mobility.
Time frame: Baseline to 8-week assessment (i.e. post-intervention)
Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale
A 20-item questionnaire that assesses limitations in daily activities due to back pain. Scores can range from 0-100% with higher scores indicating greater back pain-related disability.
Time frame: Baseline to the 6-month assessment
10 Meter Walk Test -- Self-Selected Gait Speed at 6 Months (Final Assessment)
A performance test where participants walk along a 10-meter linear pathway at their 'usual pace' for three trials. Average self-selected gait speed is determined over the central 6 meters of the course in meters/second. Faster walking speeds indicate better mobility.
Time frame: Baseline to 6-months
10-Meter Walk Test at Fast Speed (10MWT)
A performance test where participants walk along a 10-meter linear pathway 'as quickly as possible', for three trials. Average fast gait speed is determined over the central 6 meters of the course in meters/second. Faster walking speeds indicate better mobility.
Time frame: Baseline, 8-weeks (i.e. post-intervention), and 6-months
Timed Up-and-Go (TUG)
A performance test where participants rise from a chair, walk 3 meters at their regular pace, and return to a seated position in the same chair. One practice trial is performed followed by three timed trials; performance times are averaged. Greater times indicate worse physical function.
Time frame: Baseline, 8-weeks (i.e. post-intervention), and 6-months
Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
A performance test where participants are asked to walk as far as they can in six minutes around a continuous track. Greater distances (in meters) indicate better mobility and exercise tolerance.
Time frame: Baseline, 8-weeks (i.e. post-intervention), and 6-months
30 Second Chair Stand Test
A performance test where participants perform as many sit-to-stands as possible in 30 seconds while their arms are folded across their chest. The number of stands are counted. Higher numbers correlate with better scores.
Time frame: Baseline, 8-weeks (i.e. post-intervention), and 6-months
Movement-evoked Pain From the 6MWT and the 30 Second Chair Stand Test
Post-test pain intensities, i.e., 0-10, for both the Six-Minute Walk Test and the 30 Second Chair Stand Test were used in the calculation of aggregate movement-evoked pain. Scores for this measure were the sum of both post-test pain intensities, resulting in a score range of 0-20, where higher numbers indicate worse pain.
Time frame: Baseline, 8-weeks (i.e. post-intervention), and 6-months
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
A 9-item questionnaire that assesses the presence/absence of depressive symptoms. Scores above 5 indicate likeliness of depressive symptoms. Scores range from 0-27.
Time frame: Baseline, 8-weeks (i.e. post-intervention), and 6-months
Low Back Activity Confidence Scale (LOBACS)
A 15-item questionnaire that measures a person's confidence in their ability to perform different activities, including carrying, pushing, sitting, walking, and exercising, which may be directly affected by low back pain. There is an overall score, as well as three Self-Efficacy Subscales: Functional, Self-Regulatory, and Exercise. Overall, as well as subscales, range from 0-100%, where higher numbers indicate higher confidence.
Time frame: Baseline, 8-weeks (i.e. post-intervention), and 6-months
Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)
A 40-item questionnaire that contains five domains (symptoms, pain, activity of daily living (ADL), sport and recreation, and quality of life). Each scale ranges from 0-100, where higher scores are better, indicating lower hip-related disability.
Time frame: Baseline, 8-weeks (i.e. post-intervention), and 6-months
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29
A 29-item short form questionnaire developed by the National Institutes of Health that assesses the following domains of health-related quality of life: physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, pain interference, and pain intensity. Higher scores indicate better greater presence of each outcome. Possible T-scores for each domain as follows, where a T-score of 50 equals the mean of the United States population and every 10 points above or below the mean is 1 standard deviation away (e.g., a 60 is 1 standard deviation above the mean): Physical Function: 22.5-57.0; Anxiety: 40.3-81.6; Depression: 41.0-79.4; Fatigue: 33.7-75.8; Sleep Disturbance: 32.0-73.3; Social Roles: 27.5-64.2; Pain Interference: 41.6-75.6.
Time frame: Baseline, 8-weeks (i.e. post-intervention), and 6-months
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
A 13-item questionnaire that that assesses how a person perceives pain. Items can be scored as three subscales to evaluate constructs of rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Higher scores (scale of 0-52) indicate greater levels of pain catastrophizing.
Time frame: Baseline, 8-weeks (i.e. post-intervention), and 6-months
Hip Strength
A series of strength testing measurements will be conducted using a hand-held dynamometer. All participant and examiner body positions are standardized using study protocols, and measurement locations are standardized using anatomical landmarks. Strength measurements (in kilograms) are taken for the following hip motions: abduction, extension, external rotation, internal rotation, and flexion. Measurements from the weaker side were normalized to, i.e., divided by, body weight (in kilograms), therefore, there is no unit for the measure.
Time frame: Baseline, 8-weeks (i.e. post-intervention), and 6-months
Quantitative Sensory Testing
A test where the assessor uses an algometer (i.e., handheld device that calculates the amount of force applied to the skin) to measure pressure pain sensitivity at 4 sites: upper trapezius, posterior superior iliac spine, greater trochanter, and tibialis anterior; higher values indicate higher pain thresholds, with values ranging from 0 to 10.1, where 10.1 indicates the participant tolerated 10 kilograms of force/cm squared without pain and therefore, no further pressure was applied. Pressure starts at 0.00 kilograms-of-force per square centimeter and is increased by 1-kgf/cm squared per second until the participant first experiences pain.
Time frame: Baseline, 8-weeks (i.e. post-intervention), and 6-months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.