Hypothesis 1: On fMRI scanning, frontoparietal activation during performance of executive function tasks of working memory, inhibitory control processes, and stimulus-response interference will exhibit greater signal intensity, a wider spatial extent, and more bilateral activation in chronic MTBI than chronic OI participants. Hypothesis 2: DTI changes, characterized by lower FA and higher MD at the gray-white junction, corpus callosum, central semiovale, and internal capsule, will be seen in MTBI but not in OI subjects. Hypothesis 3: Increased fMRI activation in chronic MTBI will be correlated with location and severity of disrupted fiber tracks that subserve neural networks associated with each fMRI activation task. Hypothesis 4: Performance on computerized neuropsychological testing (ANAM) and reaction time measures on fMRI tasks will better discriminate MTBI from OI than standard paper-and pencil tests. Hypothesis 5: The combination of fMRI, DTI, and ANAM will better discriminate MTBI from OI than each individual method. Hypothesis 6: More severe brain pathology in MTBI, as measured by neuroimaging (fMRI, DTI) and ANAM test scores, will be associated with less severe PTSD and symptoms.
Traumatic brain injuries (TBI) are a common occurrence from roadside blasts of improvised explosive devices (IEDs). Like civilian TBI, blast-related TBI can result from mechanical forces in which objects in motion strike the head or the head is forcefully put into motion and strikes an object. TBI from exposure to an explosive blast may also result from a third cause: barotrauma. Blasts produce wave-induced changes in atmospheric pressure, which in turn produce characteristic injuries to vulnerable bodily regions at air-fluid interfaces, such as the middle ear. It is unknown whether the neural and cognitive sequelae of blast-related TBI differ from those resulting from mechanically-induced TBI commonly observed in civilian accidents. Understanding the potentially unique sequelae of blast-related TBI is critical for accurate diagnosis and designing effective pharamacological and neurorehabilitation interventions. In the proposed cross-sectional study, we aim to apply neurobehavioral testing and advanced MRI techniques \[task-activated functional MRI (fMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)\] to gain a comprehensive understanding of the neural changes underlying blast-related MTBI. This will be accomplished by comparing neurobehavioral and neuroimaging findings obtained from military personnel who have experienced a blast injury with those obtained from civilians who have experienced TBI from motor vehicle accidents and from military and civilian control participants with orthopedic injuries. We will accomplish this goal by conducting advanced neuroimaging (task-activated fMRI and DTI fiber tracking) and neurobehavioral testing (computerized assessment and standard neuropsychological testing) on 120 chronic trauma patients: 30 military MTBI patients who have experienced blast injuries, 30 civilian MTBI patients with mechanical closed head injuries, and 30 military and 30 civilian patients with orthopedic injuries.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
60
Brain activation on Stop Signal Reaction Time Task (SSRT)
fMRI measuring brain activation associated with performance of SSRT
Time frame: 12-24 months post-injury
Brain activation on Sternberg Item Recognition Task (SIRT)
fMRI measuring brain activation associated with performance of SIRT
Time frame: 12-24 months post-injury
Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory
self-report of various domains of emotional status
Time frame: 12-24 months post-injury
Post-traumatic Symptom Checklist-Civilian (PCL-C)
Checklist of posttraumatic stress symptoms
Time frame: 12-24 months post-injury
Center for the Epidemiological Center for Study of Depression (CES-D)
Self-report measure of depression
Time frame: 12-24 months post-injury
Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)
Measure of processing speed
Time frame: 12-24 months post-injury
Trail Making Test A and B
Measure of visuoperceptive performance and speed
Time frame: 12-24 months post-injury
Controlled Oral Word Association
Measure of verbal fluency
Time frame: 12-24 months post-injury
California Verbal Learning Test 2
Verbal learning test
Time frame: 12-24 months post-injury
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.