The objective of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of Biosure Regenesorb Interference Screw versus BIOSURE HA Interference Screw (control device) in patients requiring reconstruction of cruciate ligaments of the knee. The trial results will be used for registration of Biosure Regenesorb Interference Screw in China. The primary efficacy endpoint of this study is Lysholm score at 12 months after operation. The non-inferiority testing is performed for efficiency of primary efficacy endpoint, and the test hypothesis is as follows: Invalid hypothesis: H0: μ1-μ2 ≤-δ Alternative hypothesis: H1: μ1-μ2 \> -δ, where, μ1 and μ2 are the Lysholm scores in the investigational group and control group, respectively. δ is a non-inferiority critical value.
The clinical trial is designed to be a prospective, multi-center, randomized, evaluator-blinded, parallel-controlled, non-inferiority trial.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
140
The Biosure Regenesorb Interference Screw, an absorbable screw designed with an open structure and made of biocomposite material made of PLGA, β-TCP and calcium sulfate, is used to fix ligaments, tendons, soft tissues or bone-tendon-bone grafts in knee surgery. Its open structural design enables rapid bone ingrowth to make the screw integrated with bone tissues so as to promote healing.
BIOSURE HA Interference Screws and Drivers are designed for durability and reduced screw breakage. Both the screws and driver have been enhanced to allow screws to fully seat on the driver all the way to the tip of the screw, helping stress distribution and force transfer. The screw design also incorporates a consistent wall thickness throughout the length of the screw for added durability and features a tapered body for ideal ease of insertion.
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Haidian District, China
The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Changsha, Hunan, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale 12 Months After Operation
Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale evaluates functions of participants based on 8 items: limp, support, interlocking, pain, instability, swelling, stair climbing and squatting. The total Lysholm score is 0-100. Pain and instability account for a higher proportion in this score. The knee functions of patients are considered excellent when the score is 95-100, good when 84-94, fair when 65-83 and poor when less than 65 (i.e., 100 is best outcome and 0 is the worst outcome).
Time frame: 12 months
Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale Pre-Operation and 6 Months & 24 Months After Operation
Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale evaluates functions of participants based on 8 items: limp, support, interlocking, pain, instability, swelling, stair climbing and squatting. The total Lysholm score is 0-100. Pain and instability account for a higher proportion in this score. The knee functions of patients are considered excellent when the score is 95-100, good when 84-94, fair when 65-83 and poor when less than 65 (i.e., 100 is best outcome and 0 is the worst outcome).
Time frame: Pre-Operation, Post-Operation 6 months, 24 months
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score
The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score is composed of a knee evaluation form (10 items) and a knee ligament examination form (8 items), involving joint pain, sport level and ability of daily activities. The total score is transformed to a scale ranging from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the lowest level of knee function and highest level of symptoms (i.e., worst outcome), and 100 represents the highest level of knee function and lowest level of symptoms (i.e., best outcome).
Time frame: Pre-Operation, Post-Operation 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Drawer Test: Anterior
The Anterior Drawer Test is used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) examination with an outcome of either negative or positive. The test was performed with the participant lying supine with the knee flexed at 90 degrees and the foot stabilized flat on the table. The examiner then grasped the tibia and applied an anterior force to assess displacement. The test outcome was measured by the number of participants with a negative or positive result. A positive test indicated forward straight instability, defined as the tibia being displaced forward by 5 millimeters (mm) or more compared to the uninjured side.
Time frame: Post-Operation 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Drawer Test: Posterior
The Posterior Drawer Test is used for posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) examination with an outcome of either negative or positive. The test was performed with the participant lying supine with the knee flexed at 90 degrees. The examiner placed both hands on the proximal lower leg (just below the knee joint) with thumbs on the tibial tuberosity then attempted to translate the lower leg posteriorly. The test outcome was measured by the number of participants with a negative or positive result. A positive test indicated a lack of end feel or excessive posterior translation.
Time frame: Post-Operation 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Lachman Test
The Lachman Test assessed integrity of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) with an outcome of either negative or positive. The test was performed with the participant lying supine with the knee flexed to 20-30 degrees and the injured limb slightly rotated outward. The examiner immobilized the lower end of the femur with one hand and pressed the posterior side of the upper end of the tibia forward or backward. The test outcome was measured by the number of participants with a negative or positive result. A positive test indicated excessive anterior translation of the tibia greater than the uninjured side along with a soft end feel.
Time frame: Post-Operation 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Imaging Evaluation: X-ray
Radiographic assessment taken from x-ray images to evaluate the general view of bone. The assessment measured the number of participants categorized with either a normal or abnormal imaging evaluation.
Time frame: Post-Operation 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Imaging Evaluation: Computed Tomography (CT)
Radiographic assessment taken from Computed Tomography (CT) images to evaluate specific view of bone. The assessment measured the number of participants categorized with either a normal or abnormal imaging evaluation.
Time frame: Post-Operation 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Imaging Evaluation: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Radiographic assessment taken from Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to evaluate ligament. The assessment measured the number of participants categorized with either a normal or abnormal imaging evaluation.
Time frame: Post-Operation 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.