This study is a prospective, open label, two-arm, randomized multicenter trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aspirin plus prasugrel as compared with aspirin plus clopidogrel in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stents for complex coronary lesions.
Over the past several decades, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with the combination of aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor has become an essential treatment in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to reduce ischemic events. Although the optimal duration of DAPT still remains controversial in patients with coronary artery disease, the recommended duration of maintenance of DAPT for patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stent is ≥12 months for those with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and ≥6 months for those with stable coronary artery disease according to the current guidelines. However, individualized approach based on ischemic versus bleeding risks assessment is needed to determine the optimal duration of DAPT in various population. Several studies reported that patients undergoing PCI for complex lesions had significantly higher rates of ischemic events than those with non-complex lesions. Moreover, prolonged DAPT of aspirin and clopidogrel more than 1 year significantly reduced the risk of cardiac ischemic events up to 44% in patients undergoing PCI for complex coronary lesions, and the current guideline recommends prolonged DAPT duration may be considered in patients undergoing complex PCI. Apart from prolonged use of DAPT, use of more potent P2Y12 inhibitor than clopidogrel may be another strategy to reduce ischemic events in patients undergoing PCI for complex coronary lesions. Prasugrel, a new thienopyridine, inhibits platelet aggregation more rapidly and potently than clopidogrel. In the TRITON-TIMI 38 (TRial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet InhibitioN with Prasugrel) study, prasugrel reduced ischemic events compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Moreover, low dose prasugrel also reduced ischemic events without an excessive bleeding risk in Japanese population. Therefore, DAPT of aspirin and prasugrel would reduce recurrent ischemic events than DAPT of aspirin and clopidogrel in patients undergoing PCI for complex lesions, a high risk group of ischemic events, even when they do not present with myocardial infarction. So far, there have been no data on this issue. The aim of the SMART-ATTEMPT (Aspirin and a PoTent P2Y12 inhibitor versus aspirin and clopidogrel Therapy in patients undergoing Elective percutaneous coronary intervention for coMPlex lesion Treatment) trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aspirin plus prasugrel as compared with aspirin plus clopidogrel in patients undergoing elective PCI for complex lesions.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
3,500
Dual antiplatelet therapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor plus aspirin will be given according to the allocated arms in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention for complex coronary lesion 1. Prasugrel plus Aspirin arm 2. Clopidogrel plus Aspirin arm
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea
RECRUITINGSamsung Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea
RECRUITINGMajor adverse cardiac events (MACE)
A composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis
Time frame: 1-year after randomization
All-cause death
Death by any cause
Time frame: 1-year after randomization
Cardiac death
Death by cardiac cause
Time frame: 1-year after randomization
Myocardial infarction
Myocardial infarction
Time frame: 1-year after randomization
Stent thrombosis
Definite or probable stent thrombosis
Time frame: 1-year after randomization
Target lesion revascularization
Repeat revascularization for target lesion of index PCI
Time frame: 1-year after randomization
Target vessel revascularization
Repeat revascularization for target vessel of index PCI
Time frame: 1-year after randomization
Any revascularization
Any repeat revascularization
Time frame: 1-year after randomization
A composite of all-cause death/myocardial infarction/stent thrombosis/any revascularization
A composite of all-cause death/myocardial infarction/stent thrombosis/any revascularization
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 1-year after randomization
A composite of all-cause death/myocardial infarction
A composite of all-cause death/myocardial infarction
Time frame: 1-year after randomization
A composite of cardiac death/myocardial infarction
A composite of cardiac death/myocardial infarction
Time frame: 1-year after randomization
Cerebrovascular accident
Cerebrovascular accident
Time frame: 1-year after randomization
A composite of all-cause death/myocardial infarction/cerebrovascular accident
A composite of all-cause death/myocardial infarction/cerebrovascular accident
Time frame: 1-year after randomization
A composite of cardiac death/myocardial infarction/cerebrovascular accident
A composite of cardiac death/myocardial infarction/cerebrovascular accident
Time frame: 1-year after randomization
A composite of cardiac death/myocardial infarction/stent thrombosis
A composite of cardiac death/myocardial infarction/stent thrombosis
Time frame: 1-year after randomization
Bleeding by BARC types 3 or 5
Bleeding defined by Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 3 or 5
Time frame: 1-year after randomization
Bleeding by BARC types 2, 3, or 5
Bleeding defined by BARC types 2, 3 or 5
Time frame: 1-year after randomization
Net adverse clinical events
MACE + bleeding by BARC types 3 or 5
Time frame: 1-year after randomization