Open-label, interventional, multicentric, randomized, phase III study. Cancer studied is the oropharyngeal cancer. Study is composed by 2 arms of subjects: prophylactic or reactive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement. All subjects will be treated with a cisplatin standard chemotherapy regimen and by simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).
Open-label, interventional, multicentric, randomized, phase III study. Cancer studied is the oropharyngeal cancer. Study is composed by 2 arms of subjects (male or female): prophylactic or reactive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement. The arm will be allocated by randomisation (1:1). * Prophylactic PEG (pPEG): Prophylactic PEG tube will be placed before the start of the study treatment (CRT). The enteral nutrition will start following the assessment by the clinical dietitian in order to complete the current oral consumption according to the estimated energy needs (on the basis of 30 to 35 kcal / kg adapted and 1.2 to 1.5 g / prot./ kg.BW) with an increase as needed during the treatment. * Reactive PEG (rPEG): Reactive PEG tube will be placed and enteral nutrition initiated, during the study treatment period in case of decrease of oral intake less than 2/3 of estimated energy requirements (based on 30-35 kcal / adapted kg .BW and 1.2 - 1.5 g/prot./adapted kg. BW) for a period of or anticipated to be, greater than 7 days or weight loss ≥ 5% from pre-treatment baseline). All subjects will be treated with a cisplatin standard chemotherapy regimen and by simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Cisplatin: Two therapeutic regimens are allowed: * Days 1 and 22: cisplatin 100mg/m2 IV * Days 1,8,15,22,29 and 39: weekly cisplatin 40mg/m2 IV Radiotherapy: The median dose prescription will be 32 x 2.16 Gy to the high risk PTV and 32 x 1.75 Gy to the elective PTV. Medical device: The medical device used in this trial is a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube with the CE label: CE0120. The medical device is used in the indication of the notice. The estimated number of subjects to screen is 121 patients for an estimated number of 110 patients randomised for 100 evaluable patients. The end of study will be declared when all the following criteria will have been met: * The study ends after last visit of the last patient remaining in the study. * The trial is mature for the analysis of the endpoints as defined in the protocol, if the trial reaches its endpoints. * The database has been fully cleaned and frozen for all analyses.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
placement of the PEG tube depends on arm
Two therapeutic regimen allowed: * Days 1 and 22 : cisplatin 100mg/m2 IV * Days 1,8,15,22,29,36: weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 IV
Simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The median dose prescription will be 32 x 2.16 Gy to the high risk PTV and 32 x 1.75 Gy to the elective PTV.
CHU Saint Pierre
Brussels, Belgium
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGInstitut Jules Bordet
Brussels, Belgium
RECRUITINGglobal M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory score at 6 months after end of treatment.
The M.D.Anderson Dysphagia inventory is a dysphagia-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with H\&N cancer including 20 items divided into 4 subscales emotional (6 questions), functional (5 questions), physical (8 questions) and one global question. Each subscale has a score ranging from 1 to 5 (higher scores represent a better outcome). The mean score of the 20 items will be multiplied by a factor of 20 to obtain a MDADI total score which ranges from 20 (extremely low functioning) to 100 (high functioning). A difference of 8 points in MDADI score is considered as the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the trial.
Time frame: at 6 months after end of treatment
Assessment of Quality of Life
Outcome measure: completion of EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline; at week 3 & 6 during treatment; at 1,3, 6, 12 and 24 months after end of treatment
Assessment of Quality of Life
Outcome measure: completion of EORTC QLQ-H\&N43 module questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline; at week 3 & 6 during treatment; at 1,3, 6, 12 and 24 months after end of treatment
Assessment of Quality of Life
Outcome measure: completion of FACT-HN questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline; at week 3 & 6 during treatment; at 1,3, 6, 12 and 24 months after end of treatment
Assessment of chemo-radiotherapy treatment related toxicities and PEG tube placement complications
Outcome measure: Incidence, type and severity of all adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events according to CTCAE version 5.0 ;
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 38 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
110
Assessment of chemo-radiotherapy treatment related toxicities and PEG tube placement complications
Outcome measure:Incidence, type and severity of radiotherapy related AEs also according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) / European Organisation for Research and treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores; In the RTOG/EORTC Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring, 0 means an absence of radiation effects and 5 means the effects led to death. The severity of reactions is graded from 1 through 4.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 38 months
Assessment of chemo-radiotherapy treatment related toxicities and PEG tube placement complications
Outcome measure:Severity of oropharyngeal mucositis and swallowing disorders according to Internal consensus scale (ICS);
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 38 months
Assessment of chemo-radiotherapy treatment related toxicities and PEG tube placement complications
Outcome measure: Oropharyngeal mucositis according to the oral mucositis weekly questionnaire-Head and Neck cancer (OMWQ-NH) completed by the subject;
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 38 months
Assessment of chemo-radiotherapy treatment related toxicities and PEG tube placement complications
Outcome measure: Salivary toxicity according to the xerostomia questionnaire completed by the subject.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 38 months
Impact of the nutritional status on survival and toxicity outcomes
Outcome measure: Clinical dietitian assessment including risk screening by Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002)
Time frame: Baseline, during treatment period (7 weeks) and follow-up period (24 months)
Impact of the nutritional status on survival and toxicity outcomes
Outcome measure: Clinical dietitian assessment using GLIM criteria (Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria).
Time frame: Baseline, during treatment period (7 weeks) and follow-up period (24 months)
Assessment of clinical tumour response after study treatment
Outcome measure:Tumour response after study treatment measured by DECT and PET-CT
Time frame: at 3 and 12 months after end of treatment
Assessment of the subject outcome
Outcome measure: loco regional control (LRC)
Time frame: at 3, 12 and 36 months after end of treatment
Assessment of the subject outcome
Outcome measure: distant recurrence/distant progression (DR/DP)
Time frame: at 3, 12 and 36 months after end of treatment
Assessment of the subject outcome
Outcome measure: second primary (SP)
Time frame: at 3, 12 and 36 months after end of treatment
Assessment of the subject outcome
Outcome measure: disease-free survival (DFS)
Time frame: at 3, 12 and 36 months after end of treatment
Assessment of the subject outcome
Outcome measure: disease specific survival (DSS)
Time frame: at 3, 12 and 36 months after end of treatment
Assessment of the subject outcome
Outcome measure: overall survival (OS)
Time frame: at 3, 12 and 36 months after end of treatment
Impact of tobacco consumption on the outcomes
Outcome measure: Assessment of the smoking consumption
Time frame: Baseline, at week 3 and at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after the end of treatment.
Impact of HPV on the outcomes
Outcome measure: HPV/p16 status
Time frame: at screening
Cost-Effectiveness of each treatment strategy
Outcome measure: EuroQol 5D5L Questionnaire
Time frame: during the pre-study treatment period (within 15 days after randomisation and before starting study treatment) and at 12 months after end of treatment
Clinical validation of cancer prediction models available at www.predictcancer.org
HPV-based prognostic nomogram for oro-pharyngeal carcinoma
Time frame: at 6 months after treatment
Clinical validation of cancer prediction models available at www.predictcancer.org
prediction tool for swallowing dysfunction, xerostomia, sticky saliva and tube feeding dependence
Time frame: at 6 months after treatment