Does the use of decellularised dermis allograft in addition to compression therapy promote healing in chronic venous leg ulceration compared to compression therapy alone
Chronic venous ulceration are open wounds on the lower limbs which have been present for at least three months and are caused by a poorly functioning venous system. The affect about 1% of the general population and about 4% of those over 65. The wounds cause pain, reduced movement, and can smell - greatly affecting the quality of life of leg ulcer patients. The standard care for these patients is compression bandaging, which requires changing several times a week by community or district nurses; this drives the high cost of leg ulcer care, which can amount to £2.5 billion per annum. Skin grafting can be used alongside compression bandaging and can help the ulcers heal faster than compression alone. Grafts can be taken from the patient's own skin, from a donor or from tissue engineered skin. An autograft (using own skin) can cause scarring and the need for a formal surgical procedure in theatre so are not suitable for all ulcer patients. Allografts (donor skin) and xenografts (animal skin) have been used successfully, but present similar drawbacks to autografts, plus the potential for the body to reject the graft and disease transmission. Tissue engineered skin has several advantages as it has been processed to remove the cells, and therefore is won't be rejected via the immune response. Human decellularised dermis (DCD) is generated from donated skin from deceased people and processed to remove the cells. It can be glued or sewn onto the skin under local anesthetic, in an out patient setting. DCD has mainly been studied in patients with diabetic foot ulceration and has shown improved healing rates and quality of life. This study will investigate the use of DCD in addition to compression therapy versus compression therapy alone in patients with chronic venous leg ulceration.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
71
DCD is produced from split thickness skin grafts (which comprise the epidermis and upper part of the dermis), and is retrieved from deceased tissue donors. All epidermal and cellular components from the dermis are removed in a patented sequential decellularisation process. As a decellularised graft, dCELL® Human Dermis fully integrates into the wound bed after application, replacing lost dermal tissue. It provides a scaffold into which the recipient's cells can grow, becoming vascularised and supporting the generation of a new epidermis, ultimately regenerating into normal skin.
Compression therapy will be according to local practice and may include multilayer elastic compression bandaging or stockings delivering 20 to 40mm/Hg pressure.
North Bristol NHS Trust
Bristol, United Kingdom
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
Cardiff, United Kingdom
Proportion with a healed index ulcer at 12 weeks after randomisation.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Time to index ulcer healing from randomisation
Time frame: 12 months
The percentage change in index ulcer area in cm2 at 12 weeks from randomisation
Time frame: 12 weeks
The proportion of participants with a healed index ulcer at 12 months from randomisation
Time frame: 12 months
The proportion of participants whose index ulcer healed for whom an ulcer recurred at the index site within 12 months from randomisation
Time frame: 12 months
Generic quality of life using the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire
A health index on a score of 0 to 1 and the participants' self-rated health on a vertical score of zero to 100. Higher scores indicate better quality of life
Time frame: 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months from randomisation
Disease specific quality of life using the Charing Cross Venous Ulcer Questionnaire (CCVUQ)
Scale 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating better quality of life
Time frame: 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months from randomisation
The cost for each patient, calculated from the healthcare resources used
Time frame: 12 months
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) from the EQ-5D questionnaire, with appropriate sensitivity analysis
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
North Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust
Carlisle, United Kingdom
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Gloucester, United Kingdom
AT Medics
London, United Kingdom
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
London, United Kingdom
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
London, United Kingdom
London North West University Healthcare
London, United Kingdom
St Charles Centre for Health and Welbeing, Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust
London, United Kingdom
Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Newport, United Kingdom
...and 7 more locations
An intervention may be considered cost-effective when its ICER is less than the threshold set by health policy decision-makers. In the UK, the cost-effectiveness threshold is currently in the range £20 000-30 000 per QALY
Time frame: 12 months