Drug-coating balloon (DCB) is a new interventional device for treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). There is limited data on the long term efficacy and safety of DCB-only strategy for coronary de novo lesions in Asian patients. We therefore carry out this registry study to evaluated the clinical outcomes of paclitaxel DCB in Chinese patients in a real world medical practice.
DCB has emerged as a new interventional option to treat obstructive CAD. Characterized by non-stent-based local drug delivery system, DCB has several advantages over drug-eluting stent(DES).Paclitaxel DCB inhibits excessive neointimal hyperplasia of a diseased lesions without leaving a permanent metallic frame, therefore reducing the risk of coronary thrombosis and eliminating adverse events associated with stent fracture, allergic reactions to metal struts or polymer. Since only 1 to 3 months duration of dual anti-platelet therapy(DAPT) is required after DCB intervention, the bleeding risk associated with prolonged DAPT is reduced. DCB angioplasty was proved safe in an all-comers, prospective, multicenter registry and confirmed not inferior to DES when treating small coronary lesions in a randomized clinical trial(BASKET SMALL-2). DCB has been used in"off-label"indications in the"real world" for de novo lesions, especially in vessels with diameter more than 2.75mm, and there is limited data on its long term clinical efficacy and safety in Asian patients in contemporary clinical registries. We therefore sought to evaluate the long term clinical outcome of DCB in treatment of coronary de novo lesions in Chinese patients.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
300
The length of the DCB catheter should be chosen to exceed the target lesion for at least 2mm (at both proximal and distalends). The catheter(s) will be inflated for 30 to 60s with a minimum of 7 atm. Predilation of the diseased coronary segment with a uncoated balloon/scoring balloon/cutting balloon before the use of DCB will be encouraged. DES should be implanted if the angiographic result after DCB alone therapy is not satisfactory due to significant recoil/residual stenosis or dissection (Type C-F).
Beijing Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
RECRUITINGThe rate of net adverse cardiac events (NACEs) at 24 months after DCB treatment.
A composite endpoint of NACEs, including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, stroke, all cause bleeding.
Time frame: Clinical follow-up at 24 months after the procedure.
Late lumen loss(LLL) at 24 months follow-up
LLL is defined as minimal lumen diameter(MLD) at follow-up minus MLD immediately post the procedure according to QCA.
Time frame: Coronary angiography follow-up at 24 months after the procedure.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.