Deficits or abnormalities in reward processing are present in a number of psychiatric disorders. The overarching objective of the study is to conduct initial validation work towards optimising three experimental tasks - which have previously been shown to be sensitive to reward processing deficits - for future use in clinical trials. This initial validation work has the primary objective to uncover group differences in task outcome measures between healthy control participants, participants with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and participants with schizophrenia (SZ) using statistical analyses. This may provide some indications for the use of these tasks as clinically-relevant biomarkers. Primary aims include: (i) comparing the investigator's endpoint means and distributions to those in previously published data; (ii) replication of previously-reported differences between MDD/SZ vs. healthy control participants, and, (iii) exploring the relationship between task endpoints and subjective participant- and clinician-rated report of reward-related constructs (e.g. anhedonia, negative symptoms).
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
160
* Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS; Snaith et al. 1995) * Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS; 16 items) * Behavioral avoidance/inhibition Scales (BIS/BAS)
* Grip Strength Effort Task (Reddy et al. 2015; in combination with EEG) * Doors (Gambling) task (Foti and Hajcak 2009; in combination with EEG) * Reinforcement Learning/Working Memory task (Collins et al. 2017; no EEG)
* Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS: Kay et al. 1987) * Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS; Kirkpatrick et al. 2011)
University Hospital Frankfurt, Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherap
Frankfurt, Germany
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine, Department of Clinical Pharmacology
Thessaloniki, Greece
Maastricht University
Maastricht, Netherlands
Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Addictions (INAD), Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona
Barcelona, Spain
Grip effort outcome
Percentage of hard task choices at different reward levels
Time frame: Day 1
Doors task outcome
"Feedback negativity", an event-related potential (ERP) at approximately 300ms after feedback presentation indicating a favourable versus unfavourable outcome in paradigms in which the participant loses or wins money.
Time frame: Day 1
RL/WM task outcome
Accuracy as function of set size (difficulty)
Time frame: Day 1
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.