Critically ill patients under mechanical ventilation (MV) have pain, anxiety, sleep deprivation and agitation. The use of analgesics and sedatives drugs (sedoanalgesia) is a common practice to produce pain relief and comfort during the VM. Despite its usefulness, it has been documented that the excessive use of sedatives is associated with an increased risk of prolonging the stay under MV and in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). To avoid this, current evidence suggests the use of protocols guided to clinical goals, such as the sedation-agitation scale (SAS), or daily suspension of infusions to avoid excess sedation. These protocols minimize the prescription of deep sedation, which is still necessary for 20-30% of patients. Monitoring of sedation with electroencephalography in the ICU has been underutilized. In fact, only the use of indices that are generated from algorithms of the electroencephalographic signal processing has been reported. However, it has been shown that the use of these monitoring systems does not benefit the heterogeneous groups of patients in MV. Currently, the clinical monitors used to measure the effect of drugs used in a sedoanalgesia show in the screen the spectrogram of the brain electrical signal and quantify the frequency under which 95% of the electroencephalographic power is located, known as spectral edge frequency 95 (SEF95). This value in a person who is conscious is usually greater than 20 Hz, in a patient undergoing general anesthesia it is between 10 and 15 Hz. In preliminary measurements, in deeply sedated patients in the ICU, SEF95 values are under 5 Hz. This would indicate that patients in the ICU are being overdosed. It is unknown if in cases with an indication of deep sedation, the use of monitoring by spectrogram is superior to the standard management guided at clinical scales, such as SAS. Therefore, the investigators propose the following hypothesis: In patients with an appropriate indication of deep sedation (SAS 1-2), the sedoanalgesia guided by the spectral edge frequency 95 reduces the consumption of propofol compared to the deep sedoanalgesia guided by the sedation scale agitation in MV patients in the ICU maintaining a clinically adequate level of sedation.
To determine whether deep sedoanalgesia guided by the spectral edge frequency 95 decreases propofol consumption with respect to deep sedoanalgesia guided by the sedation-agitation scale in patients hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit under mechanical ventilation. * Group intervention: sedation will be guided by SEF95 and SAS. Patients will be sedated to keep a SAS 1-2 with a SEF95 between 10 to 13 Hz. * Group control: sedation will be guided by SAS. However, SEF95 will be also recorded but covered.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Dosage of propofol and fentanyl will be guided by SEF95 value between 10-13 Hz. If SEF95 is lower than 10 Hz, the infusion rate of propofol and fentanyl will be diminished; if SEF95 is higher than 13 Hz, the infusion rate of propofol and fentanyl will be increased; and if SEF95 is between 10-13 Hz, then the infusion rate will be kept.
Dosage of propofol and fentanyl will be guided by SAS to keep a value of 1-2. If SAS is higher than 1-2, then the infusion rate of propofol and fentanyl will be increased; and if SAS is 1-2, then the infusion rate of propofol and fentanyl will be maintained.
Propofol and fentanyl will be infused to reach a score in the SAS of 1-2
Critically ill patients will be ventilated mechanically following the clinical indication.
Centro de Investigación Cínica Avanzada (CICA), Hospital Clinico de la Universidad de Chile
Santiago, RM, Chile
Hospital Clinico de la Universidad de Chile
Santiago, RM, Chile
Plasma concentration of propofol
It will be measured using HPLC
Time frame: 48 hours
Total dose of propofol
In mg
Time frame: Each 2 hours for 48 hours
Total dose of fentanyl
In mcg
Time frame: Each 2 hours for 48 hours
SAS (Sedation Agitation Scale)
The scale evaluates sedation and agitation of a patient, thus the name is "Sedation Agitation Scale". The total range goes from 1 to 7, where: 1 is Unarousable, 2 is Very Sedated, 3 is Sedated, 4 is Calm and Cooperative, 5 is Agitated, 6 is Very Agitated, and 7 is Dangerous Agitation. If clinical indication is a deep sedation, then the patient must reach a SAS 1-2. If clinical indication is a light sedation, then the patient must reach a SAS 3-4. Scores of 5, 6 and 7 must be avoided with drugs.
Time frame: Each 2 hours for 48 hours
SEF95
Spectral Edge Frequency 95
Time frame: Each 2 hours for 48 hours
Mean Arterial Pressure
In mmHg
Time frame: Each 2 hours for 48 hours
Plasma triglyceride levels
Central laboratory
Time frame: 24 hours and 48 hours
Plasma lactate concentration
Central laboratory
Time frame: 24 hours and 48 hours
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Since the beginning of the protocol
Time frame: Up to 30 days
Stay in intensive unit care
Since the beginning of the protocol
Time frame: Up to 30 days
Wake up after stopping the infusion of propofol
Time frame: Up to 48 hours
Delirium
Evaluated with CAM-ICU twice a day during the stay in ICU
Time frame: Up to 10 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.