To compare the safety and efficacy profile of PN40082 versus Restylane Silk Injectable Gel with 0.3% lidocaine (Restylane Silk) for lip augmentation in approximately 158 subjects.
The objective of the study is to compare the safety and efficacy profile of PN40082 versus Restylane Silk Injectable Gel with 0.3% lidocaine (Restylane Silk) for lip augmentation. Approximately 158 subjects will be randomized at approximately 7 sites in this is a double-blind, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical study of subjects seeking lip augmentation. Subjects meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized 1:1 to treatment with either PN40082 or Restylane Silk. The Evaluating Investigator will be blinded to the treatment. Injections of the study device will be performed by an unblinded Treating Investigator. At each visit, the blinded Evaluating Investigator evaluations and subject evaluations of the treated areas will be performed and recorded. Visits and telephone contacts will occur at: Visit 1 / Week 0 (Day 1) - baseline and treatment * Day 3 (±2 days) - Safety follow-up telephone call * Day 14 (±2 days) - Safety follow-up telephone call Visit 2 / Day 28 (±2 days) / Month 1 - interim visit (touch-up if necessary) * Day 33 (±2 days) - Safety follow-up telephone call (for subjects with touch-up treatment * Day 44 (±2 days) - Safety follow-up telephone call (for subjects with touch-up treatment) Visit 3 / Day 56 (±4 days) / Month 2 - interim visit Visit 4 / Day 84 (±4 days) / Month 3 - interim visit * Day 112 (±4 days) / Month 4 - Safety follow-up telephone call * Day 140 (±4 days) / Month 5 - Safety follow-up telephone call Visit 5 / Day 168 (±7 days) / Month 6 - End of Study (EOS) Visit. All subjects will undergo the consent procedure for the open label retreatment protocol. Evaluations include: Lip Fullness Grading Scale (LFGS) (Overall lip fullness considering both lips together, fullness of the upper lip and fullness of the lower lip) Perioral lines at rest severity scale (POL) (Overall perioral lines at rest severity considering both lips together, perioral lines at rest severity of the upper lip and perioral lines at rest severity of the lower lip) Patient Global Aesthetic Improvement (pGAI) Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement (iGAI) Safety will be assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) at all study visits Other Safety Evaluations include: Lip Function Lip Sensation Other evaluations include: Investigator Ease of Use Assessment Swelling Assessment Subject Satisfaction with Lips Assessment Subjects participation will be approximately 6 months and the study is estimated to last 20 months from first subject first visit to last subject last visit.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
158
To provide a 1-point improvement in the lip fullness grading scale score of subjects with very thin or thin lips or subjects with Fitzpatrick IV, V or VI to improve the LFGS score by 1 for 1 or both lips
To provide a 1-point improvement in the lip fullness grading scale score of subjects with very thin or thin lips or subjects with Fitzpatrick IV, V or VI to improve the LFGS score by 1 for 1 or both lips
Tennessee Clinical Research Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Change in Overall Lip Fullness Grading Scale
The Lip Fullness Grading Scale is a 5 point photonumeric rating scale with 0 being very thin lips (worse outcome) up to 4 being full lips (better outcome)
Time frame: Visit 1 baseline to Visit 3 Month 2, 56 days
Treatment Success Lip Fullness Grading Scale
Percent of subjects with Lip Fullness treatment success (responder: overall LFGS based on the Blinded Evaluating Investigator Assessment) at Visit 3/Month 2 where responder is defined as a subject with at least a 1-grade increase from baseline on the LFGS post augmentation The lip fullness grading scale is a 5 point photonumeric rating scale with 0 being very thin lips (worse outcome) to 4 being full lips (better outcome)
Time frame: Visit 1 baseline to Visit 3 Month 2, 56 days
Treatment Success Perioral Lines Severity Scale
Percent of responders with Perioral Lines Treatment Success overall on the POL severity scale at Visit 4/Month 3 (defined as a subject demonstrating ≥ 1-point improvement, i.e., decrease in severity, from baseline. The Perioral Lines at rest severity scale is a 4 point rating scale with 0 = None, a mouth with no perioral lines (better outcome) to 3 = Severe, being a mouth with many deep lines or crevices (worse outcome)
Time frame: Visit 1 baseline to Visit 4 Month 3, 84 days
Change From Baseline to Visit 4/Month 3 in Overall Lip Fullness Grading Scale
The lip fullness grading scale is a 5 point photonumeric rating scale with 0 being very thin lips (worse outcome) to 4 being full lips (better outcome)
Time frame: Visit 1 baseline to Visit 4 Month 3, 84 days
Change From Baseline to Visit 5/Month 6 in Overall Lip Fullness Grading Scale
The lip fullness grading scale is a 5 point photonumeric rating scale with 0 being very thin lips (worse outcome) to 4 being full lips (better outcome)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Visit 1 baseline to Visit 5 Month 6, 168 days