The aim of the study is to demonstrate the safety and performance of a novel non-invasive glucose monitoring device, to collect data and reference measurements for establishment of calibration models and to evaluate the instructions for use for the device. This study will be an explorative study with 10 study subjects.
The Investigational Medical Device (IMD) for this investigation is the Prototype 0.5 (P0.5) developed and manufactured by RSP Systems (RSP). The device is intended for non-invasive interstitial intermittent glucose monitoring in persons (age 18 and older) with diabetes. The technology relies on the well-established capacities of Raman spectroscopy for directly detecting glucose subcutaneously. The Raman spectroscopy physical principle relies on the fact that when laser light of a given wavelength interferes with a molecule, a small fraction of the incident light will interact with the vibrational states of the molecule, causing the photons to lose a portion of their energy which will change the wavelength of the light. The scattered light will be collected by the optical probe head and analyzed with advanced algorithms to correlate the signal to glucose concentrations. Data collected from the IMD will be paired with validated glucose reference values collected by the finger sticking method.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
10
Subjects will perform daily measurements on the IMD (Prototype 0.5) for 41 days.
Institut für Diabetes-Technologie Forschungs- und Entwicklungs-gesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm (IDT)
Ulm, Germany
Measurement accuracy
Accuracy of measurements performed on the IMD will be evaluated by data from subjects. Data will be analyzed by Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD).
Time frame: 4 months
Risk/benefit analysis
Risk/benefit analysis based on reported Adverse Device Effects and Serious Adverse Device Effects and the clinical performance safety profile.
Time frame: 4 months
Review of IFU based on clinical performance.
Adequacy of IFU will be evaluated based on differences in clinical performance in two groups with and without personal training.
Time frame: 4 months
Review of IFU based on number of safety events.
Adequacy of IFU will be evaluated based on differences in safety events in two groups with and without personal training.
Time frame: 4 months
Number of encountered Device Deficiencies
Evaluation of device function with respect to identity, quality, durability, reliability, safety and performance
Time frame: 4 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.