This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab (Ocrevus®) compared with placebo in participants with primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS), including participants later in their disease course. This study will consist of the following phases: screening, double-blind treatment, an optional post-double-progression ocrelizumab (PDP OCR) treatment, follow-up 1 (FU1), an optional open-label extension (OLE), and follow-up 2 (FU2).
The screening phase will last up to 24 weeks. In the double-blind treatment phase, participants will undergo at least 144 weeks of study treatment. Study drug (ocrelizumab or placebo) will be administered every 24 weeks. All participants who discontinue prematurely from the double-blind treatment phase will enter the FU1 phase, including participants receiving other immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive treatment(s) for MS, commercial ocrelizumab, or no treatment. The FU1 phase will run in parallel with the double-blind treatment phase for 144 weeks or until the primary analysis is performed, whichever occurs first. An optional OLE phase is planned for eligible participants who either have either completed 144 weeks of the double-blind treatment phase or are ongoing in the double-blind treatment phase at the time of the primary analysis and, in the opinion of the investigator, could benefit from ocrelizumab treatment. The following participants will move into the FU2 phase: participants who are ongoing in the FU1 at 144 weeks from randomization or at the time of the primary analysis; participants who have either completed 144 weeks of the double-blind treatment phase or are ongoing in the double-blind treatment phase at the time of the primary analysis and will not enter the OLE phase; participants who have completed or withdrawn from the OLE phase or from PDP OCR treatment phase.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
The first dose of ocrelizumab will be administered as two 300 milligrams (mg), IV infusions given 14 days apart. For the subsequent doses, ocrelizumab will be administered as a single 600 mg infusion every 24 weeks. A minimum interval of 20 or 22 weeks, depending on if the previous dose was administered in one or two infusion, should be maintained between each infusion.
The first dose of placebo will be administered as two IV infusions given 14 days apart. For the subsequent doses, placebo will be administered as a single infusion every 24 weeks, with a minimum interval of 20 or 22 weeks, depending on if the previous dose was administered in one or two infusions, maintained between each infusion.
Time to Onset of 12-week Composite Confirmed Disability Progression (cCDP12) in FAS
Time to onset of cCDP12=time from randomization to the first occurrence of at least one of the following progression events: 1) 20% worsening from baseline in 9-hole Peg Test (9-HPT) confirmed for at least 12 weeks; 2) increase of ≥ 1.0 point from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score in participants with a baseline EDSS score ≤5.5 or an increase of ≥ 0.5 point in participants with a baseline EDSS score of \>5.5 that is confirmed for at least 12 weeks. EDSS disability scale is based on a standard neurological examination, incorporating functional systems \& ambulation, that ranges in 0.5-point steps from 0 \[normal\] to 10.0 \[death\]. 9-HPT is a quantitative measure of arm \& hand function, where participants placed \& removed pegs 1 by 1 into 9 holes arranged in a board \& complete 2 successful trials for each hand \& the total time (in seconds) required was recorded. The longer it took to complete the test, the higher the scores, indicating deterioration.
Time frame: Up to approximately 243 weeks
Time to Onset of cCDP12 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Activity Analysis Set
Time to onset of cCDP12 was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of at least one of the following progression events: 1) 20% worsening from baseline in 9-HPT confirmed for at least 12 weeks; 2) increase of ≥ 1.0 point from baseline in EDSS score in participants with a baseline EDSS score ≤5.5 or an increase of ≥ 0.5 point in participants with a baseline EDSS score of \>5.5 that is confirmed for at least 12 weeks. EDSS disability scale is based on a standard neurological examination, incorporating functional systems \& ambulation, that ranges in 0.5-point steps from 0 \[normal\] to 10.0 \[death\]. 9-HPT is a quantitative measure of arm \& hand function, where participants placed \& removed pegs 1 by 1 into 9 holes arranged in a board \& complete 2 successful trials for each hand \& the total time (in seconds) required was recorded. The longer it took to complete the test, the higher the scores, indicating deterioration.
Time frame: Up to approximately 243 weeks
Time to 12-week CDP in 9-HPT
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
1,013
Georgetown University Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
MS and Neuromuscular Center of Excellence
Clearwater, Florida, United States
Neurological Services of Orlando
Orlando, Florida, United States
Vero Neurology
Vero Beach, Florida, United States
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
The Boster Center for Multiple Sclerosis a Singlepoint Healthcare Company
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Columbus Neuroscience
Westerville, Ohio, United States
Albert Einstein Medical Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Brain and Mind Research Institute
Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
Austin Hospital
Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
...and 145 more locations
12-week CDP in 9-HPT was defined as a 20% worsening from baseline in 9-HPT confirmed for at least 12 weeks. 9-HPT is a quantitative measure of upper extremity (arm and hand) function. The test device consists of a container containing nine pegs and a wood or plastic block containing nine empty holes. Participants were required to pick up each of the 9 pegs one at a time and place them in the 9 holes. Once all the pegs were in the holes, the participants then removed them as quickly as possible. Both dominant and non-dominant hands were tested twice, and the total time (in seconds) to complete the task was recorded. The longer it took to complete the test, the higher the scores, indicating deterioration.
Time frame: Up to approximately 243 weeks
Time to 12-week CDP in EDSS
12-week CDP in EDSS=an increase of ≥1.0 point from baseline EDSS score in participants with a baseline EDSS score of ≤5.5 or an increase of ≥0.5 points in participants with a baseline EDSS score of \<5.5 that is confirmed for at least 12 weeks after initial documentation of the progression. EDSS was used to measure changes in the disability level of participants with MS over time. EDSS is based on a standard neurological examination, incorporating functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel \& bladder, \& cerebral \[or mental\]) that are rated \& then scored as a functional system scores (FSS), \& ambulation, which is scored as ambulation score. Each FSS is an ordinal clinical rating scale where score ranges from 0-5/6, \& ambulation score that is rated from 0 to 16. These ratings along with observations \& assistive devices were then used to determine the total EDSS score. The total EDSS score ranges from 0 (normal) to 10.0 (death) in 0.5-point steps.
Time frame: Up to approximately 243 weeks
Time to 24-week CDP in 9-HPT
24-week CDP in 9-HPT was defined as a 20% worsening from baseline in 9-HPT confirmed for at least 24 weeks. 9-HPT is a quantitative measure of upper extremity (arm and hand) function. The test device consists of a container containing nine pegs and a wood or plastic block containing nine empty holes. Participants were required to pick up each of the 9 pegs one at a time and place them in the 9 holes. Once all the pegs were in the holes, the participants then removed them as quickly as possible. Both dominant and non-dominant hands were tested twice, and the amount of time (in seconds) to complete the task was recorded. The longer it took to complete the test, the higher the scores, indicating deterioration.
Time frame: Up to approximately 243 weeks
Time to 24-week CDP in EDSS
24-week CDP in EDSS=an increase of ≥1.0 point from baseline EDSS score in participants with a baseline EDSS score of ≤5.5 or an increase of ≥0.5 points in participants with a baseline EDSS score of \<5.5 that is confirmed for at least 24 weeks after initial documentation of the progression. EDSS was used to measure changes in the disability level of participants with MS over time. EDSS is based on a standard neurological examination, incorporating functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel \& bladder, \& cerebral \[or mental\]) that are rated and then scored as a FSS, and ambulation, which is scored as ambulation score. Each FSS is an ordinal clinical rating scale where score ranges from 0 to 5 or 6, and ambulation score that is rated from 0 to 16. These ratings along with observations and assistive devices were then used to determine the total EDSS score. The total EDSS score ranges from 0 (normal) to 10.0 (death) in 0.5-point steps.
Time frame: Up to approximately 243 weeks
Annual Rate of Change From Baseline in Radius of Total Volume of T2 Lesions
Volume of T2 lesions was measured using MRI scans. Mean difference in annual rate of change from baseline in radius of total volume of T2 lesions between the ocrelizumab and placebo arms in participants with PPMS, including participants later in their disease course, where no treatment discontinuation nor initiation of alternative MS disease-modifying treatment (DMT) or commercial ocrelizumab occurred, is reported. Random Coefficient Regression (RCRM) Model was used to estimate annual rate of change.
Time frame: Up to approximately 120 weeks
Annual Rate of Percent Change From Week 24 in Total Brain Volume
Brain volume was measured using MRI scans. Mean difference in annual rate of percent change from Week 24 in total brain volume between the ocrelizumab and placebo arms in participants with PPMS, including participants later in their disease course, where no treatment discontinuation nor initiation of alternative MS DMT or commercial ocrelizumab occurred, is reported. RCRM Model was used to estimate annual rate of change.
Time frame: From Week 24 up to approximately 120 weeks
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A SAE is any AE that is: Fatal; Life-threatening; Requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization; Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; A congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant born to a mother exposed to study drug OR a significant medical event in the investigator's judgment.
Time frame: From initiation of study drug up to approximately 10.5 years
Serum Concentration of Ocrelizumab
Time frame: Up to approximately 10.5 years
B-cell Levels in Blood
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, 204 and 228
Change From Baseline in B-cell Levels
Time frame: Weeks 2, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, 204 and 228
Percentage of Participants With B-cell Counts ≤5 Cells/μL
Percentages have been rounded off.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, 204 and 228
Percentage of Participants With B-cell Counts ≤10 Cells/μL
Percentages have been rounded off.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, 204 and 228
Number of Participants With ADAs to Ocrelizumab
Prevalence of ADAs at baseline is defined as the number of participants that is ADA positive at baseline. For determining post-baseline incidence, participants are considered to be ADA-positive if they are ADA-negative or have missing data at baseline but develop an ADA response following study drug exposure, or if they are ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of 1 or more post-baseline samples is at least 0.60 titer unit (t.u.) greater than the baseline titer result.
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 10.5 years