This is a factorial experimental trial involving adult survivors of cardiorespiratory failure treated in intensive care units (ICUs) that is conceptualized as the Optimization Phase of a multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) framework. This will allow optimization of a mobile mindfulness intervention by comparing eight different iterations across domains including impact on symptoms, feasibility, acceptability, usability, scalability, and cost.
As survival has improved for the 2 million people with cardiorespiratory failure managed annually in US intensive care units (ICUs), it has become apparent that these patients suffer from severe and persistent post-discharge symptoms of psychological distress including depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, few targeted interventions exist that are relevant to patients' experiences and that accommodate their many physical, social, and financial barriers to personalized care. To fill this gap, an innovative app-based mobile mindfulness training program twas developed hat promotes automated care delivery and self-management of symptom-related distress. Subsequently, a pilot randomized clinical trial (RCT) called the LIFT study (R34 AT00819) compared mobile mindfulness to both a standard telephone mindfulness program and an ICU education control among survivors of cardiorespiratory failure. Key findings were that mobile mindfulness was feasibly delivered, acceptable, usable, and had a greater clinical impact on psychological distress than either comparator. This trial also highlighted opportunities to improve the intervention's impact related to its targeted population, content delivery, and system technology. To address these gaps, this 5-year project is conceptualized as the Optimization Phase of a multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) framework. It will optimize mobile mindfulness with four specific aims as described in the following sections. At the conclusion of this factorial randomized clinical trial study involving 240 cardiorespiratory failure survivors, a mobile mindfulness system fully optimized for usability, efficiency, scalability, and clinical impact will be delivered that will be off-the-shelf ready for a next-step definitive RCT-and can serve as a model for distance-based mind and body interventions.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
247
The intervention core is a mobile app-based mindfulness training program designed to be used over a 1-month period. All 6 factorial groups will use the app, though the delivery of the app and response to psychological distress symptoms over time will differ by group.
University of Colorado - Denver
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Item Scale (PHQ-9)
Absolute values, not change scores. Depression symptoms. Scores range from 0 (better) to 27 (worse)
Time frame: 1 month post-randomization
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item Scale (GAD-7)
Absolute values, not change scores. Anxiety symptoms. Scores range from 0 (better) to 21 (worse)
Time frame: Between baseline 1 month post-randomization
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Item Scale (PHQ-9)
Absolute values, not change scores. Depression symptoms. Scores range from 0 (better) to 27 (worse)
Time frame: Between baseline 3 months post-randomization
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item Scale (GAD-7)
Absolute values, not change scores. Anxiety symptoms. Scores range from 0 (better) to 21 (worse)
Time frame: Between baseline 3 months post-randomization
Post-Traumatic Stress Symptom Inventory (PTSS)
Absolute values, not change scores. PTSD symptoms. Scores can range from 10 (best) to 70 (worst).
Time frame: Between baseline 3 months post-randomization
Intervention Adherence: Activity in App During Final Week of Intervention
Quantified by number with activity (or not) in app during final week (4) of intervention
Time frame: 1 month post-randomization
Intervention Adherence: Number of Views of Content
Quantified by mean (SD) number of intervention content (audio, video, text) views
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 1 month post-randomization
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ)
A measure of acceptability. Scores can range from 8 (worst) to 32 (best)
Time frame: 3 months post-randomization
Systems Usability Scale (SUS)
A measure of intervention usability. Each of 10 items is scored from 1 to 5. For each of the odd numbered questions, subtract 1 from the score. For each of the even numbered questions, subtract their value from 5. Take these new values and add up the total score. Then multiply this by 2.5.Scores can range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best)
Time frame: 3 months post-randomization
Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)
This is the absolute value, not change score. A measure of mindfulness qualities. Scores can range from 5 (worst) to 30 (best).
Time frame: Between baseline and 1 month post-randomization
Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)
These are absolute values, not change scores. A measure of mindfulness qualities. Scores can range from 5 (worst) to 30 (best).
Time frame: Between baseline 3 months post-randomization
Patient Health Questionnaire 10-item Scale (PHQ-10)
These are absolute values, not change scores. An adapted version of the PHQ-15; a measure of physical symptoms. Scores can range from 10 (best) to 20 (worst).
Time frame: Between baseline and 1 month post-randomization
Patient Health Questionnaire 10-item Scale (PHQ-10)
This is an absolute value, not a change score. An adapted version of the PHQ-15; a measure of physical symptoms. Scores can range from 10 (best) to 20 (worst).
Time frame: Between baseline 3 months post-randomization
EuroQOL Scale
This is an absolute, not change, value. the EuroQOL is a measure of quality of life. Scores can range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best)
Time frame: Between baseline and 1 month post-randomization
Change in EuroQOL Scale
A measure of quality of life. Scores can range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best)
Time frame: Between baseline 3 months post-randomization
Distress Associated With Depression Symptom Frequency
A visual analog scale appended to the PHQ-9 which allows participants to report how distressing they perceive the depression symptoms to be that they reported in the PHQ-9. Scores range from 0 (best) to 100 (worst)
Time frame: Between baseline and 1 month post-randomization; THIS WAS NOT RECORDED
Distress Associated With Depression Symptom Frequency
A visual analog scale appended to the PHQ-9 which allows participants to report how distressing they perceive the depression symptoms to be that they reported in the PHQ-9. Scores range from 0 (best) to 100 (worst)
Time frame: At 1 month post-randomization
Distress Associated With Anxiety Symptom Frequency
A visual analog scale appended to the GAD-7 which allows participants to report how distressing they perceive the depression symptoms to be that they reported in the GAD-7. Scores range from 0 (best) to 100 (worst)
Time frame: At 1 month post-randomization
Distress Associated With Anxiety Symptom Frequency
A visual analog scale appended to the GAD-7 which allows participants to report how distressing they perceive the depression symptoms to be that they reported in the GAD-7. Scores range from 0 (best) to 100 (worst)
Time frame: Between baseline 3 months post-randomization
Distress Associated With PTSD Symptom Frequency
A visual analog scale appended to the PTSS which allows participants to report how distressing they perceive the depression symptoms to be that they reported in the PTSS. Scores range from 0 (best) to 100 (worst)
Time frame: At 1 month post-randomization
Distress Associated With PTSD Symptom Frequency
Absolute values, not change scores. A visual analog scale appended to the PTSS which allows participants to report how distressing they perceive the depression symptoms to be that they reported in the PTSS. Scores range from 0 (best) to 100 (worst)
Time frame: At 3 months post-randomization
Post-Traumatic Stress Symptom Inventory (PTSS)
Absolute values, not change scores. Post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms. Scores can range from 10 (best) to 70 (worst).
Time frame: Between baseline and 1 month post-randomization
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ)
A measure of acceptability. Scores can range from 8 (worst) to 32 (best)
Time frame: 1 month post-randomization
Systems Usability Scale (SUS)
A measure of intervention usability. Each of 10 items is scored from 1 to 5. For each of the odd numbered questions, subtract 1 from the score. For each of the even numbered questions, subtract their value from 5. Take these new values and add up the total score. Then multiply this by 2.5.Scores can range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best)
Time frame: 1 month post-randomization