A randomized controlled trial enrolling 900 parent-infant dyads (English and Spanish speaking) comparing Greenlight (control), a behavioral intervention focusing on nutrition, physical activity, media use, and sleep as compared to Greenlight Plus (intervention) which includes the above materials plus a health information technology (HIT) intervention aimed at supporting family goal-setting and behavior change during well-child checks throughout the first 2 years of life.
The investigators propose a randomized trial to compare the effectiveness of two different approaches to early childhood obesity prevention in children 0-2 years of age. The investigators will randomize 900 parent-infant dyads, recruited from six newborn nurseries/primary care clinics. The participating organizations are part of both CORNET, a national practice-based research network of pediatric residency primary care practices supported by the Academic Pediatric Association (APA), and PCORnet, the national research network supported by PCORI. In the nursery or at the first newborn clinic visit, eligible families will be consented and randomized to one of two arms. In Arm 1 ("Greenlight"), during each of the recommended well child visits from 0-24 months, pediatric residents, trained in clear health communication skills and shared goal-setting, will use the Greenlight Toolkit of low literacy, age-specific, parent education booklets to promote healthy family behaviors and obesity prevention. In Arm 2 ("Greenlight Plus"), families will receive the Greenlight intervention plus a health information technology (HIT) intervention aimed at supporting family goal-setting and behavior change. This design allows us to determine if HIT and the asynchronous support it provides between well-child visits can promote additional behavior change and obesity prevention. Specific Aims \& Hypotheses (H) include: Aim 1: Compare the effectiveness of the 2 arms on weight-for-length and other weight measures through age 2. H1: Arm 2 will be significantly better than Arm 1 in supporting healthy child weight-for-length trajectory over 2 years; Aim 2: Compare the effectiveness of the two approaches on parent-reported outcomes, including child feeding and physical activity behaviors, parent feeding beliefs and behaviors, media use, and quality of doctor-patient communication. H2: Arm 2 will be significantly better at improving parent-reported health behaviors. Aim 3: Examine differences in main outcomes by social determinants, including race/ethnicity, language, health literacy. H3: A literacy- and culturally-sensitive approach to obesity prevention will result in equal subgroup improvements. Aim 4: To compare weight-for-length trajectory over 2 years in both intervention arms with a non-enrolled comparison group, using data from the PCORnet Common Data Model at participating sites. H4: PCORnet analysis will reveal the benefit of both Greenlight approaches (Arms 1 and 2) compared to before Greenlight intervention implementation and the added benefit of Arm 2 (Greenlight Plus) over other approaches.
Families randomized to the Greenlight Plus arm will receive a HIT intervention starting at the newborn clinic visit. During the newborn visit, these families will receive basic instructions on how to access the Greenlight technology platform, which includes the iOTA text-messaging application and a website (usable on desktop or mobile platform). Families will receive text messages and goal-setting over the first 2 years of the child's life.
All residents and families seen in the participating clinics will receive the basic Greenlight materials.
Stanford University
Stanford, California, United States
University of Miami
Coral Gables, Florida, United States
New York University
New York, New York, United States
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Child Weight for Length Trajectory
The primary outcome was child weight for length (kg/m) trajectory over 2 years. Weight and length measurements were obtained during pediatric care visits and abstracted from the medical record.
Time frame: Baseline to 24 months
Child BMI Z-score Trajectory
Time frame: Baseline to 24 months
Child Weight-for-length Z-score Trajectory
Time frame: Baseline to 24 months
Child Overweight and/or Obesity
Outcome defined by CDC or WHO standards
Time frame: at 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
900
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States