Background: The combination of Lactobacillus fermentum and Lactobacillus delbrueckii (Lactobacillus LB) has proven to be effective and safe for the treatment of acute diarrhea in children. Also, a clinical trial in adult patients with chronic diarrhea, showed a reduction in the number of daily stools. However, the evidence is not enough regarding the efficacy and safety of Lactobacillus LB for treatment of patients with irritable bowel syndrome with predominance of diarrhea (IBS-D). Justification for this study: Lactobacillus LB could be a promising treatment for patients with IBS-D; nevertheless, the scientific evidence in this context is limited and it is not recent. Therefore, is necessary to explore the efficacy and safety of Lactobacillus LB in patients with IBS-D according to Rome IV criteria. Hypothesis: Lactobacillus LB is useful to decrease the frequency and improve the stools consistency of patients diagnosed with IBS-D by Rome IV criteria. Primary Outcome: To compare the treatment with Lactobacillus LB at two different doses: a) 20,000 million / day, vs. b) 10,000 million / day; and to determine if one of them is better than c) placebo, to decrease the frequency (weekly average of the number of stools/day) in patients diagnosed with IBS-D by Rome IV criteria. Design of the study: Clinical trial, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled. Keywords: irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea, Lactobacillus LB, treatment, efficacy, safety.
Background: The combination of Lactobacillus fermentum and Lactobacillus delbrueckii (Lactobacillus LB) has proven to be effective and safe for the treatment of acute diarrhea in children. Also, a clinical trial in adult patients with chronic diarrhea showed a reduction in the number of daily stools. However, the evidence is not enough regarding the efficacy and safety of Lactobacillus LB for the treatment of patients with irritable bowel syndrome with a predominance of diarrhea (IBS-D). Justification for this study: Lactobacillus LB could be a promising treatment for patients with IBS-D; nevertheless, the scientific evidence in this context is limited and it is not recent. Therefore, is necessary to explore the efficacy and safety of Lactobacillus LB in patients with IBS-D according to Rome IV criteria. Hypothesis: Lactobacillus LB is useful to decrease the frequency and improve the stools consistency of patients diagnosed with IBS-D by Rome IV criteria. Primary Outcome: To compare the treatment with Lactobacillus LB at two different doses: a) 20,000 million / day, vs. b) 10,000 million / day; and to determine if one of them is better than c) placebo, to decrease the frequency (weekly average of the number of stools/day) in patients diagnosed with IBS-D by Rome IV criteria. Design of the study: Clinical trial, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled. Keywords: irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea, Lactobacillus LB, treatment, efficacy, safety.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
177
administration of different doses of Lactobacillus LB according to the treatment groups described previously
a tablet of placebo every 12 hours given by mouth
Hospital General de Mexico
Mexico City, Choose Any State/Province, Mexico
decrease in the number of stools per day
weekly average number of evacuations / day, comparing before and after treatment
Time frame: 4 weeks
improvement in the consistency of the stools according to Bristol scale.
Bristol scale: type 1= separate hard lumps, type 2= sausage shaped but lumpy, type 3= like a sausage but with cracks on ots surface, type 4= like a sausage or sanake, smooth and soft, type 5= soft blobs with clear cut-edges, type 6= fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool, type 7 = watery, no solid pieces.
Time frame: 4 weeks
improvement in bloating measured by a Likert scale (0-4)
Likert scale: 0=without bloating, 1=mild bloating, 2=moderate bloating, 3=severe bloating
Time frame: 4 weeks
improvement in abdominal pain measured by a Likert scale (0-4)
Likert scale: 0=without pain, 1=mild pain, 2=moderate pain, 3=severe pain
Time frame: 4 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.