This qualitative study evaluates the acceptability of positioning pregnant women in labour in an optimized position, which consists in the hyperflexion of the legs and the loss of the lumbar lordosis. Twenty patients in situation of dystocia will adopt the described position for a limited amount of time.
Recent data brings out that the Caesarian Section rate in Switzerland is quite high, reaching 33.4 %. Though, the reasons to this increasing amount of CS are not fully known. Therefore, it is absolutely necessary to expand the existing knowledge in different fields, including the biomechanics of childbirth. Numerous CS are performed in response to an obstructed labour, especially when the foetus does not engage in the pelvis near full dilatation. In order to manage such situations, midwifes currently position parturients in pragmatic postures. Although not verified by data, this care management suggests that it is possible to impact the position of the bone segments at stake for vaginal birth including pelvis and lumbar spine and to promote the descent of the foetus through the pelvic inlet plane. In his PhD thesis about vaginal birth biomechanics, Desseauve et al investigated this area and found out that an optimized position similar to the squatting position (hyperflexion of the thighs and loss of the lumbar lordosis) could be close to the perfect delivery position in terms of ability for the foetus to go through the pelvic inlet plane. Although these findings are encouraging, it is yet to be confirmed in clinical practice, particularly when a dystocia occurs. Prior to doing that, it is though necessary to validate the optimized posture in terms of acceptability in a qualitative clinical study. In this study, fifteen to twenty parturients who respond to the inclusion criteria and whose foetus does not engage in the pelvis near full dilation will be asked to adopt the optimized position for a twenty minutes period. The investigator will then consign information reflecting the progress of the labour on a data sheet.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
20
The parturients will be asked to adopt a supine position with a hyperflexion of the thighs and a flat back, and to maintain the position for a duration of twenty minutes.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland
Acceptability of the optimized birthing position assessed by calculating the average score obtained through the VAS
The Visual Analogue Scale will allow to obtain a score from 0 to 10, 0 standing for complete dissatisfaction and 10 for complete satisfaction of the participants
Time frame: 20 minutes
Number of refusals
Number of parturients who will refuse to participate to the study
Time frame: 20 minutes
Number of risk factors of non-engagement of the foetus at full dilation
The risk factors are constituted of macrosomy, medical induction of labour, artificial rupture of membranes, hypokinesia (\<5 uterine contractions/min), use of oxytocin and presence of a peridural anaesthesia
Time frame: 20 minutes
Neonatal adaptation assessed by the Apgar score
The Apgar score will be evaluated at 1, 5 and 10 minutes
Time frame: 20 minutes
Birth outcome assessed by the percentage of vaginal delivery, Caesarian Section, delivery hemorrhage and perineal tear
Time frame: 20 minutes
Weight of the foetus measured in kilograms
Time frame: 20 minutes
Height and head circumference of the foetus measured in centimeters
Time frame: 20 minutes
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.