The objective of this clinical study is to evaluate the efficacy of fractional RF for the treatment and reduction of acne scarring or facial wrinkles.
Prospective, single centre, evaluator-blind, split face study of the efficacy of fractional radiofrequency (RF) for the treatment and reduction of acne scarring and facial wrinkles. The study will evaluate the progress of 15 subjects requesting treatment of scarring or facial wrinkles. The study will involve three treatments on both sides of the face with 3-5 week intervals between each treatment. Subjects will be followed at 6 and 12 weeks after their last treatment. Analysis will be performed on all subjects who receive at least one treatment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
10
The Venus Viva™ fractional RF device has been shown in clinical studies to improve various skin conditions related to aging and alter collagen structures such as wrinkles, rhytids and scars.
Laser and Skin Surgery Center of Northern California
Sacramento, California, United States
Overall Wrinkle Improvement Assessed by the Fitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis Scale (FWES) at 12 Weeks Post-Final Treatment
Evaluate the efficacy of overall facial wrinkles improvement assessed live by the Investigator and a subject assessment of facial appearance including the Fitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis Scale (FWES). The FWES is a 9 point scale. Three independent evaluators evaluated before and after photographs and graded them for change. Possible responses were: a score of 1 - 3 (Mild) indicates fine texture changes with subtly accentuated skin lines, a score of 4 - 6 (Moderate) indicates distinct papular elastosis (\[indvidual papules with yellow translucency under direct lighting\] and dyschromia and a score of 7 - 9 (Severe) indicates multipapular and confluent elastosis \[thickened yellow and pallid\] approaching or consistent with cutis rhomboidalis. A lower class and a lower score means a better outcome.
Time frame: 12 Weeks Post-Final Treatment
Overall Acne Scar Improvement Assessed by the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at 12 Weeks Post-Final Treatment
Evaluate the efficacy of overall facial acne scar improvement assessed live by the Investigator and a subject assessment of facial appearance including the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). The Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale is a seven-grade subjective test. Three independent evaluators evaluated before and after photographs and graded them for change. Possible responses were (3) Very Much Improved, (2) Much Improved, (1) Improved, (0) No Change, (-1) Worse, (-2) Much Worse, and (-3) Very Much Worse. For reporting of outcomes, the higher the GAIS value, the greater the improvement (Range -3 to 3).
Time frame: 12 Weeks Post-Final Treatment
Subject Satisfaction
Subjects' assessment of satisfaction with the treatment using a 5 point Subject Satisfaction Scale at 6 Weeks and 12 weeks post-treatment. The Subject Satisfaction Scale is a five-grade subjective test. Participant were asked their satisfaction level post treatment. Possible responses were (4) Very Satisfied, (3) Satisfied, (2) Having No Opinion, (1) Unsatisfied, and (0) Very Unsatisfied.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 6 and 12 Weeks Post- Final Treatment
Subject Scale - Wong Baker FACES Pain Scale
Subject's assessment of discomfort and pain after treatments as measured by a 10 point Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale The Wong-Baker FACES pain scoring system is a subject-reported instrument using a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (most pain). Possible responses, 9 to 10 shows Hurts Worst, 7 to 8 shows Hurts Whole Lot, 5 to 6 shows Hurts Even More, 3 to 4 shows Hurts Little More, 1 to 2 shows Hurts Little Bit, 0 shows No Hurt.
Time frame: 12 Weeks Post-Final Treatment
Subject Scale - 5 Point Scale for Treatment Tolerability
Subject's assessment of treatment tolerability as measured by a 5 point scale. Participant were asked their tolerability level post treatment. Possible scores were; (4) Very Tolerable, (3) Tolerable, (2) Having No Opinion, (1) Intolerable, and (0) Very Intolerable.
Time frame: 8 Weeks Post-Final Treatment
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events
Subjects experiencing a treatment-related adverse event (AE) by 12 weeks post-treatment. A treatment-related adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to the device in a participant who received treatment. Relatedness to the device was assessed by the investigator.
Time frame: Up to 12 Weeks Post-Treatment