This trial examines the effects of filter ventilation on sensory response, smoking topography, and inhalation in current every day cigarette smokers. The physical design features of cigarettes directly impact their appeal by influencing cognitive and sensory perceptions. The introduction of a now common design feature, filter ventilation, has led to greater public harm than benefit because of the potential for greater toxicity while enhancing product appeal among smokers. Ventilated cigarettes dilute smoke, which promotes perceptions of ?smoothness? and therefore lower health risk, contributing to the overall appeal of these products. The purpose of this study is to assess whether removing ventilation from cigarette filters lowers cigarette product appeal among smokers.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the link between marketing proxies for filter ventilation (product descriptors, packaging) and risk beliefs. OUTLINE: Patients smoke 5 cigarettes separated by 30 minute washout periods. Between 48 hours and 1 week later, patients smoke another 5 cigarettes separated by 30 minute washout period with CReSSMicro topography measurement device and BioRadio device for recording inhalation patterns.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
8
Smoke cigarettes with CReSSMicro topography measurement device and BioRadio device
Ancillary studies
Smoke cigarettes
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, United States
Modified Cigarette Evaluation Questionnaire
Scored using an established algorithm. This results in 3 subscales (psychological reward, relief, reward) and 2 single items (aversion, respiratory sensation).
Time frame: Up to 210 minutes
Carbon monoxide (CO) boost
Defined as the difference between pre-smoking exhaled CO and postsmoking exhaled CO.
Time frame: Up to 210 minutes
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.