This study aims to measure the radiation safety climate in the hybrid angiography suite using self-assessment and to investigate the relationship of radiation safety climate with their self-reported safety behaviors. The hypothesis is that a radiation safety climate does exist and can be measured using self-assessment. Additionally, it is expected that the radiation safety climate positively influences radiation safety behaviors.
Radiation safety in the hybrid angiography suite is a primordial safety component which is relevant for endovascular team members and patients. To date, many interventions which aim to improve radiation safety habits of an endovascular team focus on improving technology and team radiation safety knowledge. Safety literature has indicated that a safety climate can be identified as the shared perceptions of team members or workers about the safety in their workspace and that this safety climate is closely related to safety behaviors and outcomes. In endovascular specialties, the concept of a radiation safety climate remains unexplored. Therefore, this study aims to measure the radiation safety climate in a diverse pool of endovascular team members from different hospitals, using self-assessment questionnaires and to investigate the relationship of radiation safety climate with their self-reported safety behaviors.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
92
The rating tool contains 28 statements which cover 5 dimensions (Leadership, communication, commitment, resources, risk awareness) of the radiation safety climate. Participants are asked to indicate on a scale of 1 (completely disagree) - 3 (neutral) - 5 (completely agree) whether they agree with each statement. A composite radiation safety climate score is calculated by adding ratings on all items. Minimum scale score 28 - Maximum scale score 140
The rating tool contains 2 statements which cover 2 dimensions of the radiation safety behavior. Participants are asked to indicate on a scale of 1 (completely disagree) - 3 (neutral) - 5 (completely agree) whether they agree with each statement. A composite radiation safety behavior score is calculated by adding ratings on both items Minimum scale score 2 - Maximum scale score 10
Algemeen Ziekenhuis Maria Middelares
Ghent, Oost Vlaanderen, Belgium
Ghent University Hospital
Ghent, Oost Vlaanderen, Belgium
AZ Sint Jan Brugge
Bruges, West Vlaanderen, Belgium
Jan Yperman Ziekenhuis
Ieper, West Vlaanderen, Belgium
Self-assessed radiation safety climate
Radiation safety climate using radiation safety climate tool
Time frame: Baseline measurement on study inclusion (Day 1)
Self-assessed radiation safety behavior
Radiation safety behavior using radiation safety behavior tool
Time frame: Baseline measurement on study inclusion (Day 1)
Self-assessed radiation safety knowledge and motivation
Radiation safety knowledge and motivation using rating tool
Time frame: Baseline measurement on study inclusion (Day 1)
Procedural radiation doses - Dose area product
Procedural dose area product (DAP)
Time frame: Registration during endovascular EVAR procedure - Within 1 week after patient study inclusion
Procedural radiation doses - cumulative air kerma
Procedural cumulative air kerma (CAK)
Time frame: Registration during endovascular EVAR procedure - Within 1 week after patient study inclusion
Procedural radiation doses - fluoroscopy time
Procedural fluoroscopy time
Time frame: Registration during endovascular EVAR procedure - Within 1 week after patient study inclusion
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
The rating tool contains 2 statements which cover the radiation safety knowledge and behavior. Participants are asked to indicate on a scale of 1 (completely disagree) - 3 (neutral) - 5 (completely agree) whether they agree with each statement. Minimum item score 1 - maximum item score 5
Collection of patient-related data points Demographic information: ASA-classification, BMI Procedure related information: Procedural time, approach, contrast usage case difficulty Radiation safety parameters: Air Kerma, DAP, fluoroscopy time
GZA Campus Sint Augustinus
Antwerp, Belgium