Sleep deficiency is a public health concern in children with a chronic illness such as Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) because it is often overlooked in clinical care, attributed to the underlying chronic illness, and contributes to poor health outcomes. Development of an effective technology-based sleep shared-management intervention that integrate children and parents in the co-design and development of the intervention has the potential to improve health outcomes of children living with JIA and their parents.
To develop and test a technology-based sleep shared-management intervention delivered to 8-to-13 year-old children with JIA and their parents. The initial feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of the newly developed sleep shared-management intervention will be tested in a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing the active intervention against standard care with a sample of 60 children with JIA and their parents. Sleep will be measured using actigraphy, sleep diaries, \& self-report measures. Self-efficacy will be measured before and after the intervention. The long-term goal is to develop effective and low cost treatments to reduce sleep deficiency and the sleep-related health consequences among children with JIA. The specific aims are to: Aim 1. Apply a human-centered design approach to develop and refine a technology-based sleep shared-management intervention (SLEEPSMART). Direct stakeholder input will be obtained from children and parents about their needs for sleep shared-management as well as intervention material adapted from the Transdiagnostic Sleep-Circadian Dysfunction program for youth that includes four cross cutting components (sleep complaint, education, behavior change and motivation, and goal setting) across the modules and a shared- management focus (motivation, self-efficacy) with children and parent partnering together to improve sleep. Qualitative methods (iterative cycles of semi-structured audiotaped sessions with children and parents and think-aloud observation sessions by a trained observer) will be used to evaluate the usability of the SLEEPSMART prototype. Results of these analyses will guide program finalization. Aim 2. Determine feasibility and initial efficacy of the SLEEPSMART with children with JIA in a pilot RCT. Study accrual and dropout rates will be assessed, as well as, levels of patient acceptability and engagement in a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing usual care to SLEEPSMART intervention. Preliminary effect sizes of the SLEEPSMART will be determined in youth receiving treatment compared to usual care on primary outcomes of actigraphy sleep duration, self-report sleep disturbances, and feasibility/acceptability, and secondary outcomes include self-efficacy.
Study Type
SLEEPSMART is a web-based intervention that adapted and modified components from the Transdiagnostic Sleep and Circadian intervention for youth and included four cross-cutting components (sleep complaint, education, behavior change and motivation, and goal-setting) that were integrated into each module. To begin the intervention, participants were provided a link to the SLEEPSMART intervention website for one of the above modules and an online sleep coach each week. At the end of each week, children and parents uploaded the weekly activities and goals via the REDCap link and set up a meeting with the sleep coach to review. The modules took 20 to 30 minutes to complete.
University of Washington School of Nursing
Seattle, Washington, United States
Sleep Disturbance
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance an 8-item questionnaire that measures self-reported perceptions of sleep quality, depth, and restoration within the past seven days. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1= not at all/very poor, 2 = a little bit/poor, 3=somewhat/fair, 4=quite a bit/good, 5= very much/very good). The raw scores are converted into a T-score. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Higher T-scores suggest more disturbed sleep.
Time frame: Baseline (start of the study); 2 months (immediately after the intervention), and 3 months (study completion)
Sleep Efficiency
Actigraphy variable defined as the ratio of total sleep time/time in bed where 1.0 is the most efficient sleep.
Time frame: Baseline (start of the study); 2 months (immediately after the intervention), and 3 months (study completion)
Sleep Duration
Actigraphy variable Total Sleep Time (TST), defined as the minutes during the sleep period;
Time frame: baseline (start of the study); 2 months (immediately after the intervention) and 3 months (study completion)
Acceptability of SLEEPSMART
Parent and child survey about the likes and dislikes of the study protocol, areas for improvement, SLEEPSMART program and weekly assignments. Items are scored using a 5-point scale, with 1 equalling strongly disagree and 5 equalling strongly agree. Scores can range from 9 to 45 with higher scores representing greater acceptance. A total score of moderate acceptability for the nine items would be 27.
Time frame: 3 months at study completion
Self-efficacy Child
Self-Efficacy scale: 9-item self-report of confidence in carrying out sleep-related behaviors; Likert scale from 1 (not at all confident) to 10 (totally confident); higher score indicates better self-efficacy.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
50
Time frame: Baseline (start of the study); 2 months (immediately after the intervention) and 3 months (study completion)
Self-efficacy Parent
A 9-item survey that assesses parent confidence to manage/control their children's chronic conditions and sleep, emotional functioning, and communication with healthcare providers. Items are rated using a visual analog scale, ranging from 1 = not at all confident to 10 = totally confident. A mean score is calculated with higher values indicative of higher self-efficacy
Time frame: baseline (start of the study); 2 months (immediately after the intervention) and 3 months (study completion)