The investigation aims to demonstrate the first puncture success rate, as proxy of clinical benefit and clinical performance, of bioimpedance spectroscopy based spinal needle guidance method among pediatric hemato-oncology patients requiring lumbar punctures.
The primary purpose of the investigation is to demonstrate the claimed clinical benefit and safety of Injeq IQ-Tip™ system. IQ-Tip™ is similar to common spinal needles with a custom-made stylet that enables the real-time bioimpedance measurement at the tip of the needle. The needle is connected to the analyzer device, which provides real-time CSF detection during lumbar puncture from the very tip of the needle and by these means assists conducting the medical procedure. The investigation aims to demonstrate the first puncture success rate, as proxy of clinical benefit and clinical performance, of bioimpedance spectroscopy based spinal needle guidance method among pediatric hemato-oncology patients requiring lumbar punctures. The investigation is conducted in the pediatric hematology and oncology units of three Finnish university hospitals
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
50
Physician performs therapeutic or diagnostic lumbar puncture using Injeq IQ-Tip(tm) system
Helsinki University Hospital, New Children's Hospital
Helsinki, Finland
Tampere University Hospital
Tampere, Finland
Turku University Hospital
Turku, Finland
The First Puncture Success Rate
Each individual lumbar puncture procedure is assessed as either 'first puncture success' or '-failure'. Success rate = Successes / All procedures Definition of the first puncture success: * Only one skin puncture with the needle is allowed; * Multiple stylet removals and reinsertions are allowed; * Multiple needle reorientations are allowed as long as needle tip remains inside the skin; * Physician must be able obtain a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sample that is sent to a laboratory analysis or to inject the intended medication to the patient's subarachnoid space; and * Physician conducting the puncture remains the same during the procedure
Time frame: The assessment immediately following each lumbar puncture procedure
Rate of Serious Adverse Events
Total number of serious adverse events caused by the device. Serious adverse event in probable or causal relationship to the investigational device exposure
Time frame: The assessment during four-week follow-up after each lumbar puncture procedure
Percentage of Procedures With Post-dural Puncture Headache (PDPH)
PDPH defined as headache that: * worsens in sitting or standing position * eases when lying down * occurs within 7 days after the lumbar puncture procedure Possible symptoms are recording using a diary filled by the patient or parents and verified by the study nurse.
Time frame: The assessment during 7-day follow-up after each lumbar puncture procedure
Percentage of CSF Samples With Greater or Equal to 10 Erythrocytes / mm^3
Erythrocyte (red blood cell) count according to laboratory analysis in units of 10\^6/liter or 1/mm3
Time frame: The laboratory analysis within 3 hours of the lumbar puncture
Percentage of Procedures With Other Complications or Adverse Events
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
E.g. PDPH or backache Possible symptoms are recorded using a diary filled by the patient or parents and verified by the study nurse. Diary is an open questionaire that is intended for recording any possible complication. Possible complications are not considered as pre-determined outcome measures, with the exception of Outcome #3 (rate of PDPH) Four-week follow up conducted by the study nurse from the hospital registers
Time frame: The assessment during 7-day and four-week follow ups
Aggregate Sensitivity of CSF Detection
The CSF detection performance of the investigational device is assessed by the physician. Each individual lumbar puncture procedure is classified as either 'True Positive CSF detection (TP)', 'False Negative CSF detection (FN)' or 'Procedure failed (Fail)' by the investigator. The aggregate sensitivity = Number of TPs / Total number of procedures
Time frame: The assessment immediately following each lumbar puncture procedure
Aggregate False Detection Rate of CSF Detection
Each individual lumbar puncture procedure is classified as either 'One or more False Positive CSF detections (FP)' or 'No False Positive CSF detections (TN)'. The aggregate false detection rate = Number of FPs / Total number of procedures
Time frame: The assessment immediately following each lumbar puncture procedure
Number of Required Attempts Per Successful Lumbar Puncture Procedure
In line with definition of 'the first puncture success rate', attempt is defined as: any new penetration of skin is considered a new attempt. Lumbar puncture is considered successful irrespective of the number of punctures if the CSF sample was eventually obtained and/or the injection of medicine could be performed
Time frame: The assessment immediately following each lumbar puncture procedure
Number of Failed Lumbar Puncture Procedures
Procedure is considered failed if physicians, even after multiple attempts, conclude that the lumbar puncture cannot be completed with available personnel or equipment due to any reason
Time frame: The assessment immediately following each lumbar puncture procedure