Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase for Stroke Thrombolysis Evaluation Trial in the Ambulance

Melbourne Health104 enrolled

Overview

Ischemic stroke is a major health burden globally and in Australia. Treatment for ischemic stroke is time critical and is significantly more effective if administered within the first 90 minutes of symptom onset. This clinical trial will identify if early administration of oral thrombolytic agent, tenecteplase prior to hospital can improve outcomes from stroke, and reduce costs compared to standard care of IV alteplase in hospital

Currently, alteplase is the standard clot-dissolving therapy for ischemic stroke, however this treatment is only effective in 30-45% of patients. Importantly, treatment of ischemic stroke is more effective when given within 90 minutes of stroke onset. Means of treating patients earlier with more effective therapies are needed. Ischemic stroke is a major public health problem, for which effective and accessible drug therapies remain limited. Current management of acute ischemic stroke includes treatment with a solution called alteplase, which dissolves clots in a cerebral artery. The treatment effect of alteplase is much greater if given within 90 minutes of stroke onset. As a result, there has been a significant push to take stroke care to the patient in the form of the Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU). The MSU is the first designed as a CT-capable ambulance that allows assessment and treatment of stroke patients in the pre-hospital setting. In the proposed research project, we will undertake a clinical trail investigating the effectiveness of a new thrombolytic agent in the MSU, tenecteplase. Tenecteplase has been shown to be significantly more effective at improving stroke survivor's recovery and opening blocked blood vessels than alteplase in the hospital setting. However, it is unknown if earlier administration of tenecteplase is more effective than early administration of alteplase. The tested agent, tenecteplase, is cheaper, easier to administer (no time-consuming infusions required) and more practical for an ambulance delivered therapy than the current standard of care alteplase. If tenecteplase results in better clinical outcomes in addition to these practical advantages, there is significant scope for improved patient outcomes and cost savings.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE

Enrollment

104

Conditions

Stroke, Acute, Stroke Ischemic

Interventions

TenecteplaseDRUG

Route: IV bolus injection Frequency: once only, within 4.5 hours of stroke onset

Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA)DRUG

Route: Intravenous (IV) infusion (10% as bolus and the remainder over 60 minutes) Frequency: once only, within 4.5 hours of stroke onset

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients being attended by the mobile stroke unit with an acute ischemic stroke eligible for thrombolysis using standard clinical and CT criteria. 2. Patient's age is ≥18 years 3. Premorbid mRS \<4 Exclusion Criteria: 1. Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) or other diagnosis (e.g. tumor) identified by CT on the MSU 2. Hypodensity in \>1/3 MCA territory or equivalent proportion of ACA or PCA territory on non-contrast CT on MSU 3. Pre-stroke mRS score of \> 3 (indicating significant previous disability) 4. Any terminal illness such that patient would not be expected to survive more than 1 year 5. Any condition that, in the judgment of the investigator could impose hazards to the patient if study therapy is initiated or affect the participation of the patient in the study. 6. Pregnant women. 7. Rapidly improving symptoms.

Locations (5)

Royal Melbourne Hospital

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Eastern Health

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Western Hospital

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Alfred Hopsital

Melbourne, Australia

Monash Health

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Perfusion lesion on CTP

The volume of the perfusion lesion on CTP performed on arrival at the receiving hospital, adjusted for pre-treatment NIHSS and time from initiation of treatment to CTP.

Time frame: Within 2hrs of treatment

Secondary Outcomes

Infarct core growth between baseline CTP and 24 hour MRI.

Time frame: 24 hrs

Percent reperfusion between baseline CTP and 24 hour perfusion imaging (MRI)

Time frame: 24 hrs

Reduction in NIHSS between pre-treatment score and score on ED arrival, adjusted for pre-treatment NIHSS and time from initiation of treatment to ED NIHSS score

Time frame: 2 hrs

Reduction in NIHSS between pre-treatment score and score at 24 hours post treatment, adjusted for pre-treatment NIHSS

Time frame: 24 hrs

Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months - ordinal analysis adjusted for baseline NIHSS and age

Time frame: 3 months

mRS 0-2 or no change from baseline at 3 months adjusted for baseline NIHSS and age

Time frame: 3 months

Proportion of patients where thrombolytic medication is initiated within 5 minutes of completion of CT on the MSU.

Time frame: 24 hrs

Time from completion of CT on the MSU to initiation of thrombolysis (CT to needle time)

Time frame: 2 hrs

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.