The best treatment for the open tibia fractures remains controversial. It is unknown whether minimally invasive locking plate or reamed intramedullary nail fixation will result in lower complication rates and better function.
The best fixation method for open tibial fractures remains controversial. The current standard treatment options recommended the use of intramedullary nail for treating such fractures. Recent studies also showed favorable results for the use of plates in managing open tibial fractures. However, it is unknown whether locking plate or intramedullary nail fixation will result in lower complication rates and better function. This study is a prospective, randomized trial to compare the safety and efficiency of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and reamed intramedullary nails in treating type I-II open tibial shaft fractures. The investigators hypothesize that neither intervention resulted in a superior disability rating at 12 months. Outcomes evaluated will include the rate of infection, the number of re-hospitalization for the complication, the time to bone healing, Patient-Reported outcome and quality of life and other complications.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
300
Patients randomized to the Minimally Invasive Locking Plate Fixation arm will be treated with plate fixation. The plate may be applied in a percutaneous fashion. Any combination of locked and/or non-locked screws may be used.
Patients randomized to the Intramedullary Nail Fixation arm will be receive a standard locked intramedullary nail fixation. The nail must use at least one static interlock proximal to and one static interlock distal to the fracture site. The nail may be placed with a reamed technique.
LEFS
failure.
Time frame: 12 months
EQ-5D
Reported Outcome and Quality of Life
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.