This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, open label, parallel four-arm design, multi-center study to compare different intraoperative interventions in the prevention of acute PJI development.
The study seeks to define the potential benefits that an additional prophylactic protocol involving the use of povidone iodine and vancomycin powder on the incidence of PJI in high risk TJA patients. The potential benefits of these interventions are significant both from the perspective of reducing morbidity and mortality for the patient, and from a cost-effectiveness and value-based perspective. To this end, our study seeks to assess the direct and indirect costs associated with the treatment and control groups. We anticipate that the administration of a VPIP protocol will both reduce the incidence of PJI in high risk groups relative to the control arm and will demonstrate added value from a cost-effectiveness perspective. This study looks to examine off-label use of Vancomycin Powder and Povidone Iodine 10% solution. Both products are lawfully marketed in the United States. This study is not intended to be reported to the FDA as a well-controlled study in support of a new indication and there is no intent to use it to support any other significant change in the labeling or advertising of either drug. This study does not involve a route of administration, dose, patient population, or other factor that significantly increased the risk (or decreases the acceptability of the risk) associated with the use of the drug product. The routes and dosages being tested in this protocol are part of standard clinical care in most total joint arthroplasty surgeries.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
2,129
To create the dilute solution, a staff member will draw up 17.5 mL of 10% povidone iodine with a syringe and mix it with 500 mL of normal saline, resulting in a dilution of 0.35% povidone iodine solution for use before wound closure.
2 grams of vancomycin powder will be applied to the wound and will be distributed so that approximately 1 gram is administered deep to the fascia and 1 gram superficial to the fascia
No additional steps in management are required for the control arm of the study besides lavage with 1 L of isotonic sodium chloride solution without antibiotics. No vancomycin powder or dilute povidone iodine lavage would be utilized in this cohort
Eisenhower Health
Rancho Mirage, California, United States
Centura Health
Denver, Colorado, United States
Cleveland Clinic Florida
Weston, Florida, United States
Rate of Periprosthetic Infection (PJI) After Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty.
The definition of periprosthetic infection exists when the following criteria are met: * NEW MSIS criteria for PJI: 1 major criteria (2) or 6 minor criteria (6) 26-28 * Major Criteria: \[1\] sinus tract \[2\] + Cx from 2 separate aspirations * Minor Criteria: \[1\] ESR \>30 mm/hr (1 point), \[2\] D-dimer \>860 ng/mL or CRP \>1 mg/dL \[2\] increased synovial WBC (\>3000 cells/microliter) \[4\] alpha-defensin (signal-to-cutoff ratio\>1) \[5\] leukocyte esterase (++) \[6\] increased synovial PMNs of \>80% \[7\] synovial CRP \>6.9 mg/L
Time frame: 90 Days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Boston Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
New England Baptist Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
The Orthopedic Institute of New Jersey
Sparta, New Jersey, United States
New York University Dept of Orthopedic Surgery
New York, New York, United States
Hospital for Special Surgery
New York, New York, United States
...and 4 more locations