Septic encephalopathy (SE) is defined as acute cerebral dysfunction in patients with sepsis or septic shock. SE occurs in up to 50% of critically ill patients with sepsis and is associated with a high mortality and morbidity. The pathophysiology of SE is complex and involves increased levels of inflammatory mediators such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, Interleukin (IL)-1 and IL-6, leading to blood brain barrier dysfunction and neuronal inflammation. Several biomarkers of neuronal injury have been proposed to identify patients with SE. Of these biomarkers, S100-β has the highest sensitivity and specificity. Sedation with Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a promising strategy for the management of these patients, as DEX has been shown to decrease the production of inflammatory mediators in experimental models of sepsis. In clinical studies, DEX lowers the incidence of delirium and critical illness polyneuropathy. However, its effectiveness in treatment and prevention of SE remains unclear. The aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of two standard sedation protocols (Dexmedetomidine sedation vs. Propofol / Midazolam) on serum markers of SE in critically ill patients with sepsis who require sedation and mechanical ventilation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
70
Dexmedetomidine infusion will be commenced in accordance with the hospital's local sedation protocol, without a loading dose, at a rate of 0.1 - 1.4 mcg/kg/hour to maintain sedation as per Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) sedation range specified by the treating clinician. Infusion will be continued until sedation is no longer clinically indicated up to a maximum of 7 days after enrolment.
Propofol and/or Midazolam will be used according to Hospital guidelines to maintain sedation as per Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) sedation range specified by the treating clinician.
In all participants, we will collect blood samples for measurement of neuronal and systemic biomarkers of inflammation at randomization (baseline), at day 1, day 2 and day 3 after randomization.
Inselspital, Bern University Hospital
Bern, Switzerland
S100-ß
Serum concentration of S100-ß
Time frame: at 48 hours after randomization
Neuron-specific enolase
Serum concentration of Neuron-specific enolase
Time frame: first 3 days after randomization
Interleukin 1-beta
Serum concentration of Interleukin 1-beta
Time frame: first 3 days after randomization
Interleukin 6
Serum concentration of Interleukin 6
Time frame: first 3 days after randomization
TNF alpha
Serum concentration of TNF alpha
Time frame: first 3 days after randomization
Acetylcholinesterase activity
Acetylcholinesterase activity will be measured using a point-of-care device and reported as Units/grams Haemoglobin
Time frame: first 3 days after randomization
Butyrylcholinesterase activity
Butyrylcholinesterase activity will be measured using a point-of-care device and reported as Units/L
Time frame: first 3 days after randomization
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.