The aim of this single-center prospective randomized controlled trial is to assess the superiority of contact-force-(CF)-sensing-based approach compared to conventional (non-CF-sensing) approach in the catheter ablation of PSVTs, and to investigate the safety of open-irrigated, contact-force-sensing ablation catheters (used in a "non-irrigated" mode) in these procedures.
Rationale: Multiple studies have demonstrated the importance of adequate catheter-tissue contact in the creation of effective lesions during radiofrequency catheter ablation. The development of contact-force(CF)-sensing catheters have contributed significantly to improve clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation 3-18. However CF-sensing technology is not used in the ablation of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Although PSVT ablation with the conventional approach (non-irrigated, non-CF-sensing catheters) is considered a relatively low-risk procedure with fairly high success rate (short-and long-term) 1,2,19, we hypothesize that contact-force sensing can further improve the outcomes of these procedures. Based on the results of studies on atrial fibrillation ablation (mentioned above) we believe that CF-sensing could similarly improve such important parameters as radiofrequency (RF) application number/time, total procedure time, and fluoroscopy time in cases of PSVT ablations, as well. In addition CF-sensing could also further improve acute success/recurrence rates of PSVT ablation, and might also be capable to further diminish complication risk. Primary Objective: The primary objective of the present study is to demonstrate the superiority of contact-force-sensing in the ablation of AVNRT and WPW-AVRT as assessed by the improvement in the number and duration of radiofrequency applications compared with the conventional ablation approach. Secondary Objective: Secondary objectives of the study are the followings: * to demonstrate that contact-force-sensing catheters are superior in terms of total procedure duration and fluoroscopy times in the case of AVNRT/WPW-AVRT ablation. * to show that the use of contact-force sensing catheters is non-inferior to conventional catheters (without contact-force-sensing) in terms of acute/long-term procedural success and procedural safety (major/minor complication rate) of AVNRT/WPW-AVRT ablations. Study population: All patients above 18 years without structural heart disease being referred for electrophysiological study and potential treatment with radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) with manifest (WPW syndrome) or concealed accessory pathways. Intervention: One group undergoes manual ablation using standard non-irrigated ablation catheters and the other group undergoes manual ablation with an open-irrigated ablation catheter equipped with CF- sensing (and utilized in a non-irrigated mode during ablation) Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study endpoint is the difference in RF application number during the procedures of AVNRT/WPW-AVRT ablation; secondary endpoints are differences in RF application rate, acute success rate, long-term recurrence rate (1 year) major/minor complication rate, and total procedure/fluoroscopy time.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
113
Radiofrequency catheter ablation using a standard ablation catheters: not equipped with contact-force sensing
Radiofrequency catheter ablation using a Contact-Force-sensing ablation catheter
Erasmus MC
Rotterdam, Netherlands
Number of radiofrequency applications
The number of radiofrequency applications during the ablation procedures of AVNRT and WPW-AVRT
Time frame: From the beginning till the end of the ablation procedure
Overall duration of radiofrequency applications
total of time spend from the beginning till the end of the ablation procedure
Time frame: From the beginning till the end of the ablation procedure
Long-term procedural success
Free from recurrence of pre-excitation or the same clinical type of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (AVNRT or AVRT)
Time frame: At 12 months
Acute procedural success/failure
non-inducibility of clinical arrhythmia verified at the end of the standard EP study
Time frame: at the end of the ablation procedure
Fluoroscopy time
total time for fluoroscopy time
Time frame: From the beginning till the end of the ablation procedure
Total duration of procedure
total time for duration of the procedure
Time frame: From the beginning till the end of the ablation procedure
(Serious) Adverse Events
all reported SAEs
Time frame: Till 12 months
Time to recurrence of AVNRT/WPW-AVRT
if recurrence of AVNRT/WPW-AVRT, time to recurrence
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: up till 12 months