Multiple articles report that thermal ablation is a safe and effective treatment for unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) ≤3cm. However efficacy of thermal ablation decreases with increasing lesion size. Guidelines state that thermal ablation is the preferred option for unresectable CRLM ≤3cm and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) when thermal ablation is not possible. It remains uncertain what local treatment method should be recommended for unresectable CRLM of 3-5cm.
Objective: The primary objective of this study is to compare efficacy of MWA to the efficacy of SBRT with regards to the primary endpoint (local tumour progression free survival at 1 year \[1-year LTPFS\]) in patients with unresectable CRLM (3 - 5 cm) that are unsuitable for surgery due to either comorbidities, a history of extensive abdominal surgery, a poor performance status or due to a certain unfavourable anatomical location of the tumour. Study design: COLLISION XL is a prospective multi-centre phase-II randomized controlled trial. Study population: 68 patients with 1-3 unresectable lesions of 3 - 5cm, unsuitable for (further) chemotherapy regimens, suitable for both MWA and SBRT and no or limited extrahepatic disease (1 extrahepatic lesion is allowed, not including positive para-aortal lymph nodes, celiac lymph nodes, adrenal metastases, pleural carcinomatosis or peritoneal carcinomatosis) are considered eligible. Supplementary resections for resectable lesions and thermal ablations for unresectable CRLM ≤3cm are allowed. A maximum number of 10 CRLM are allowed for patients with no extrahepatic disease and a maximum number of 5 lesions are allowed for patients with limited extrahepatic disease. Intervention: SBRT or MWA. The panel, consisting of at least two interventional radiologists, two hepatobiliary surgeons and two radiation oncologists, will appoint lesions of 3-5cm that are unresectable and suitable for both MWA and SBRT, as target lesions. All lesions that are not suitable for ablation should be resectable and all unresectable lesions \<3cm should be suitable for thermal ablation. Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary endpoint is local tumour progression free survival (LTPFS) at 1 year from randomization. Secondary endpoints are local tumour progression free survival time, OS, disease-free survival (DFS), time to progression (TTP), procedural morbidity/toxicity and mortality, assessment of pain and quality of life (QoL) and cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
68
Patients will undergo Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT)
Patients will undergo Microwave Ablation (MWA)
Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
RECRUITINGOne-year local tumor progression-free survival
One-year local tumor progression-free survival
Time frame: 1 year
Timo-to-local tumor progression
Timo-to-local tumor progression
Time frame: 5 years
Overall survival (OS)
Overall survival (OS)
Time frame: 5 years
Disease-Free Survival (DFS)
Disease-Free Survival (DFS)
Time frame: 5 years
Mortality
Mortality
Time frame: 5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.