Although wheat and gluten containing food products are generally considered to be healthy, a large number of individuals in the general population reduces or limits their intake and/or replaces wheat by other grains because of possible symptoms. This non-coeliac wheat sensitivity (NCWS) is accompanied by a range of (extra-)intestinal complaints soon after consuming wheat, which improve after wheat withdrawal. Evidence for a biological mechanism and for the exact contributing compound is limited. Furthermore, the impact of grain type, bread processing and the resulting compositional changes in bread on gastrointestinal tolerability in NCWS is unclear, especially as consumed part of a typical daily human diet. The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of well-characterised breads on (extra-)intestinal symptoms in individuals with NWGS using two double-blind randomized cross-over design (study A and B). Subjects are required to avoid any products that cause GI symptoms (e.g. wheat products) during the trial. The investigators hypothesize that grain type and processing will have a different effect on the primary outcomes. In addition, we want to explore the in vitro effect of each bread type on gut microbiota composition and activity.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
40
Two studies comprising a double-blind randomized cross-over study. All subjects start with a run-in period of 3 days, thereafter they will receive three different types of bread in a randomized order for 1 day each, with a wash-out period of at least 7 days in between. Before test days 2 and 3, there is also a run-in period of three days.
Maastricht University
Maastricht, Netherlands
Wageningen University
Wageningen, Netherlands
Overall GI symptom score
Change from baseline, measured on the Visual Analogue Scale ranged from 0 - 100, in which 0 is absence of symptoms and 100 is severe symptoms.
Time frame: At the end of day 1, 2 and 3 of the run-in period, at the end of test day 1, 2 and 3, and at the end of the last three days of each wash-out period (so the three days prior to testday 2 and 3).
Individual Intestinal symptom scores
Change from baseline, measured on the Visual Analogue Scale ranged from 0 - 100, in which 0 is absence of symptoms and 100 is severe symptoms. Parameters: abdominal pain, abdominal discomfort, belching, bloating, flatulence, diarrhoea, constipation, urge to empty bowel, fullness, nausea.
Time frame: At the end of day 1, 2 and 3 of the run-in period, at the end of test day 1, 2 and 3, and at the end of the last three days of each wash-out period (so the three days prior to testday 2 and 3).
Individual Extra-intestinal symptom scores
Change from baseline, measured on the Visual Analogue Scale ranged from 0 - 100, in which 0 is absence of symptoms and 100 is severe symptoms. Parameters: tiredness, headache, joint pains, confusion, loss of coordination, skin rash.
Time frame: At the end of day 1, 2 and 3 of the run-in period, at the end of test day 1, 2 and 3, and at the end of the last three days of each wash-out period (so the three days prior to testday 2 and 3).
Average stool frequency and consistency
Bristol Stool Scale, a validated scale for faecal frequency and consistency, by classifying faeces into seven groups. Type 1: separate hard lumps, like nuts (hard to pass); Type 2: sausage-shaped but lumpy; Type 3: Like a sausage but with cracks on its surface; Type 4: Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft; Type 5: Soft blobs with clear-cut edges (passed easily); Type 6: fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool; Type 7: watery, no solid pieces / entirely liquid. Type 1-2 indicate constipation, type 3-4 are ideal stools as they are easier to pass, and type 5-7 may indicate diarrhoea and urgency.
Time frame: After every stool production during day 1, 2 and 3 of the run-in period, during test day 1, 2 and 3, and during the last three days of each wash-out period (so the three days prior to testday 2 and 3).
Follow-up: microbiota composition
After completion of the primary study, 5 responders (see in- and exclusion criteria) will be included for a follow-up measurement. For comparison, 5 healthy controls will be included. The participants will collect one fecal sample at home. These samples will be used to study the effect of the six different bread types on microbiota composition in an in vitro fermentation model.
Time frame: Follow-up measurement, within 1 year after completion of test day 3.
Follow-up: microbiota activity
After completion of the primary study, 5 responders (see in- and exclusion criteria) will be included for a follow-up measurement. For comparison, 5 healthy controls will be included. The participants will collect one fecal sample at home. These samples will be used to study the effect of the six different bread types on microbiota activity, measured by the release of microbial VOCs, in an in vitro fermentation model.
Time frame: Follow-up measurement, within 1 year after completion of test day 3.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.