In Denmark, 1000 new cases of esophageal and gastro-esophageal junction cancer occur every year. Surgery is the primary treatment for patients with localized disease who are considered medically and technically operable. For patients deemed non-resectable, definitive chemoradiotherapy is the treatment of choice, but despite treatment with curative intent, these patients have a poor prognosis, with a median survival of less than 20 months and a 5-year survival at 15-25% in clinical studies This study will examine the effect of escalation of increasing the radiation dose to the most Positron Emissions Tomografi (PET) avid part of the tumour and lymph nodes compared to a standard uniform dose distribution.
In Denmark, there are almost 900 new cases of oesphageal and gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) cancer per year, with a 5-year survival rate below 20% for the entire group and a 5-year survival rate of approximately 40% for the curatively treated patients. Surgery is the primary treatment for patients with localized disease who are considered medically and technically operable. For patients deemed non-resectable, definitive chemoradiotherapy is the treatment of choice, but despite treatment with curative intent, these patients have a poor prognosis, with a median survival of less than 20 months and a 5-year survival at 15-25% in clinical studies. Survival is affected by several factors like stage, gender and comorbidity, but also by lack of local and regional tumour control. Several studies examined pattern of failure in patients with oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Most patients experience local failure, and most local failures were located in the Gross Tumor volume (GTV). These findings imply that future therapeutic strategies should focus on improving local control in order to increase successful treatment outcome, although care should be taken to ensure that this does not come at the cost of excess treatment related toxicity. Strategies to overcome in-GTV failures include radiotherapy-sensitizing agents and dose escalation, the latter has been evaluated in several studies with heterogeneous results. The role of Positron Emissions Tomografi/ComputerTomografi (PET/CT) in radiotherapy planning has been examined and the diagnostic value of PET/CT in oesophageal cancer is widely accepted, whereas the role in assessing tumour response to treatment is less well established. Flour-Deoxy-Glucose (FDG)-PET scans allow for measurement of changes in tumour cell metabolism that precede changes in tumour size, and reduction in FDG uptake during neoadjuvant therapy has been correlated with favourable outcomes in patients with oesophageal cancer. PET-positive areas have been suggested as suitable targets for dose-escalation strategies, since studies suggested that high FDG uptake on pre-treatment PET/CT identifies tumour sub-volumes that are at greater risk of recurrence after chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer. The major concern in a dose escalation study is severe and potentially lethal normal tissue complications. Oesophageal cancer irradiation usually results in irradiation of the oesophagus, lungs and heart due to the anatomical tumour location, which may result in acute toxicities dominated by radiation pneumonitis and esophagitis (leading to inappropriate nutricial intake). Late toxicities include oesophageal fistula/ulcers, cardiac events, pulmonary fibrosis, or even deaths related to radiation exposure. Dose gradients between the target and normal tissue may be sharp, in order to limit the norml tissue dose and hence the risk of unacceptable toxicity, while maintaining high doses to the tumour. Current study Previous studies have suggested that escalating the radiation dose to the GTV may provide improved local control, but requires great caution in relation to normal tissue irradiation to avoid unacceptable side effects. The investigators propose a study approach where both requirements will be met. FDG-PET scans will be used to identify and delineate the tumour sub-volumes with the highest tracer uptake to guide the dose-escalation. The dose to the GTV will be escalated to a high dose (63Gray (Gy) in the FDG-PET avid areas in the primary tumour and 60 Gy in the lymph nodes) while Clinical target volume (CTV) and Planning target volume (PTV) will be treated with standard dose. The patients will be randomized between this dose-escalated arm and a standard arm with 50Gy in 25 fractions. The total number of fractions will be 25 in both arms. Dose escalation will be limited by normal tissues constraints. The study will be conducted with modern state-of-the-art radiotherapy techniques, including advanced dose calculation algorithms, daily image guidance, and adaptation of the treatment plan during treatment if needed. The participating centres must implement and comply with a quality assurance program in order to maintain high treatment quality in the study.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
3
Flour-Deoxy-Glucose /Positron Emissions Tomografi (FDG-PET) scans will be used to identify and delineate the tumour sub-volumes with the highest tracer uptake to guide the dose-escalation. The dose to the Gross tumor volume (GTV) will be escalated to a high dose while clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV) will be treated with standard dose.
Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Capital Region, Denmark
Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, Central Jutland, Denmark
Odense Universityhospital
Odense, Fyn, Denmark
Loco-regional control
Loco-regional control evaluated with Flour-Deoxy-Glucose /Positron Emissions Tomografi (FDG-PET)
Time frame: 12 months
Acute and late toxicity
Acute and late toxicity during and after treatment and at follow-up visits
Time frame: 5 years
Overall survival
Number of patients surviving
Time frame: 1 and 5 years
Progression-free survival
Survival without disease progression
Time frame: 1 and 5 years
Hospitalization
Time spent at hospital and number of hospitalizations due to radiation-induced toxicity
Time frame: 12 months
Mean and maximum dose distributions
Mean and maximum doses for all organs at risk will be compared between proton therapy (in silico) and (clinical) IMRT/VMAT photon therapy.
Time frame: 6 months
Dose distributions
V5, V10, V15, V20, V25, V30, V35, V40, V45 and V50 for all organs at risk will be compared between proton therapy (in silico) and (clinical) IMRT/VMAT photon therapy.
Time frame: 6 months
Pattern of failure in GTV-T
Number of Participants with failure in the Gross tumor volume-tumor (GTV-T)
Time frame: 5 years
Pattern of failure in GTV-N
Number of Participants with failure in the Gross tumor volume-nodes (GTV-N)
Time frame: 5 years
Pattern of failure in GTV-PET
Number of Participants with failure in Gross tumor volume-PET avid (GTV-PET)
Time frame: 5 years
Pattern of failure in CTV
Number of Participants with failure in the clinical target volume (CTV)
Time frame: 5 years
Pattern of failure in PTV
Number of Participants with failure in the Planning target volume (PTV)
Time frame: 5 years
Pattern of failure outside PTV
Number of Participants with failure in the outside the Planning target volume (PTV)
Time frame: 5 years
Stability of the FDG-PET signal, intensity
Changes in FDG-PET signal measured in terms of intensity
Time frame: 12 months
Stability of the FDG-PET signal, shape
Changes in FDG-PET signal measured in terms of shape
Time frame: 12 months
Stability of the FDG-PET signal, heterogeniety
Changes in FDG-PET signal measured in terms of heterogeniety
Time frame: 12 months
Correlation between loco-regional progression after treatment and changes in FDG-PET uptake pattern during standard and dose-escalated radiotherapy.
Response will be measured based on PERCIST and using radiomics characterizing the tumour in terms of uptake intensity, shape, and volumes.
Time frame: 12 months
Treatment completion rate
Number of patients completing all radiotherapy treatments and receiving at least one cycle of chemotherapy
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.