To evaluate the AMS 800 Artificial Urinary Sphincter (AUS) in men with primary stress urinary incontinence as measured by pad weight tests.
Study is designed to evaluate the performance of the AMS 800 Artificial Urinary Sphincter (AUS) in men with primary stress urinary incontinence as measured by pad weight tests.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
145
The AMS 800 Artificial Urinary Sphincter (AUS) is an implantable, fluid filled, solid silicone elastomer device used to treat stress urinary incontinence due to reduced urethral/bladder outlet resistance (intrinsic sphincter deficiency). It is designed to restore the natural process of urinary control. The device simulates normal sphincter function by opening and closing the urethra under the control of the patient.
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
University of Colorado Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Number of Subjects With Reduction in 24 Hour Pad Weight Test at 12 Months
Number of subjects achieving 50% reduction or greater in baseline urinary incontinence as measured by 24-hour pad weight test at 12 months post device activation
Time frame: 12 months
Percentage of Participants That Required Revision (Revision Rates), Had Serious Adverse Events, and Had Serious Adverse Events That Are Device and/or Procedure Related
Percentage of Participants that Required Revision (Revision Rates), had Serious Adverse Events, and had Serious Adverse Events that are Device and/or Procedure Related at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Adverse event and revision rates are summarized by the Kaplan-Meier estimate with revision/event timing relative to the index procedure.
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Number of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Reduction in 24 Hour Pad Weight Test at Device Activation
Number of subjects achieving ≥ 50% reduction in urinary incontinence as measured by 24-hour pad weight test at device activation compared to baseline
Time frame: Device Activation
Number of Subjects Achieving ≥ 75% Reduction in 24 Hour Pad Weight Test at Device Activation
≥ 75% reduction in urinary incontinence as measured by 24-hour pad weight test at device activation compared to baseline
Time frame: Device Activation
Change in Number of Pads Per Day at 3 Months
Change in number of pads per day at 3 months compared to baseline. Change was calculated by subtracting the number of pads per day at baseline from the number of pads per day at 3 months.
Time frame: 3 months
Number of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Reduction in 24 Hour Pad Weight Test at 6 Months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
University of Kansas Hospital
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
Willis-Knighton Bossier Medical Center
Bossier City, Louisiana, United States
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Lahey Clinic Hospital
Burlington, Massachusetts, United States
University of Minnesota Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Wake Forest University School of Medicine
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
...and 8 more locations
Number of subjects achieving ≥ 50% reduction in urinary incontinence as measured by 24-hour pad weight test at 6 months post device activation compared to baseline
Time frame: 6 months
Number of Subjects Achieving ≥ 75% Reduction in 24 Hour Pad Weight Test at 6 Months
≥ 75% reduction in urinary incontinence as measured by 24-hour pad weight test at 6 months post device activation compared to baseline
Time frame: 6 months
Number of Subjects Achieving ≥ 75% Reduction in 24 Hour Pad Weight Test at 12 Months
≥ 75% reduction in urinary incontinence as measured by 24-hour pad weight test at 12 months post device activation compared to baseline
Time frame: 12 months
Change in Number of Pads Per Day at 6 Months
Change in number of pads per day at 6 months post-device activation compared to baseline. Change was calculated by subtracting the number of pads per day at baseline from the number of pads per day at 6 months.
Time frame: 6 months
Change in Number of Pads Per Day at 12 Months
Change in number of pads per day at 12 months post-device activation compared to baseline. Change was calculated by subtracting the number of pads per day at baseline from the number of pads per day at 12 months.
Time frame: 12 months