Comparison between results of repair of cut flexor zone II under General anesthesia and Walant
Cut Flexor is common injury ,has unique characters as they cannot heal without surgical treatment, unique anatomy of the tendons running through flexor tendon sheaths to function and postoperative management \&mobilization to prevent adhesions and improve gliding but risk of rupture. The hand is divided into five zones (Verdan's). Zone II is described by Bunnel as "No Man's Land" historically back to 14th century (area outside London used for executions) because it was previously believed that primary repair should not be done in this zone. After understanding of flexor tendon anatomy, biomechanics , and healing new techniques of surgery and anesthesia repair is possible with good results. General anesthesia has been the standard technique for along time. wide awake local anesthesia no tourniquet. (WALANT),using safe drugs lidocaine for anesthesia and epinephrine for hemostasis, the investigators can do operations while patient is awake. WALANT has been recommended by some surgeons to be the next standard for repair of zone 2 injuries . This techniques has a lot of Advantages in repair zone II as 1) intraoperative testing of the flexor repair by active movement to exclude any gap. and lets the surgeon see that the repair fits through the pulleys with active movement. 2)sheath and pulley damage are minimized, as flexor tendons are repaired through small transverse sheathotomy incisions 3) the surgeon can interview the patient during the procedure and assess the ability to comply with the postoperative regimen 4) the risks of general anesthesia are avoided in most patients. Negative effects of general anesthesia include nausea and vomiting, hospital admission for anesthesia recovery, exacerbation of comorbidity issues such as diabetes, aggressive flexion by the patient emerging from general anesthesia,and others
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
86
we will repair tendon of FDP only using 6 strand technique using PDS 4/0 core suture - prolene 6/0 running suture
Assiut University Hospital
Asyut, Egypt
range of motions using Jamar finger goniometer
The functions of treated fingers were calculated using original Strickland and Glogovac criteria
Time frame: baseline (2 weeks, 1.5 months , 3 months , 4.5 months and 6 months .)
complications
as adhesion formation, which limits active range of motion. joint contracture, tendon rupture, triggering, and pulley failure with tendon bowstringin Infection or neuroma
Time frame: baseline
Healing vs failure of repair
if can move and use flexor tendons again or not
Time frame: baseline
DASH score using DASH questionnaire
Disabilites of the Arm , Shoulder , Hand
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.