Individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience in impairments in mobility and cognition that increase the risk for accidental falls. More than 50% of individuals with MS experience injurious falls within a 6-month period. Current interventions to improve fall risk have focused on forward walking (FW) and balance training, resulting in small declines in the relative risk for falls with a large degree of variability. Interestingly, motor differences between MS and healthy controls are more pronounced in backward walking (BW), yet no studies have investigated BW training as an intervention to reduce fall risk in persons with MS. This study will investigate the feasibility, acceptability and impact of BW training compared to forward walking training on motor function and fall risk in persons with MS.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
90
Training will consist of BW training on both a treadmill and overground. All participants will receive 1x/week training with a trained member of the research team, who will progress the participant week-to-week and ensure safety. Treadmill speed will be determined by baseline BW walking speed and incrementally increased with each training week to subject tolerance. Participants will follow a home exercise program for the remainder of the week that includes BW, backward stepping, and functional exercises that incorporate BW movements.
Training will consist of FW training on both treadmill and overground. All participants will receive 1x/week training with a trained member of the research team, who will progress the participant week-to-week and ensure safety. Treadmill speed will be determined by baseline FW walking speed and incrementally increased with each training week to subject tolerance. Participants will follow a home exercise program for the remainder of the week that includes FW, forward stepping, and functional exercises that incorporate FW movements.
Wayne State University
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Sway during quiet stance
Measured with APDM Sensors
Time frame: Change in sway at 8 weeks
Stepping latency on push-and-release test
Measured with APDM Sensors
Time frame: Change in stepping latency at 8 weeks
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)
Scores range from 8-32, with high scores indicating greater satisfaction with the intervention
Time frame: 8 weeks
Patient Global Impression of Change
Perceived Treatment Effect; scores range from 1-7 with higher scores indicating greater perception of improvement related to the intervention.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Number of Active Minutes
Measured with Accelerometry, passively collected for a 1 week period prior to the intervention and again after the intervention concludes 8 weeks later.
Time frame: Change in Physical Activity measures at 8 weeks
Number of Falls
Number of falls reported in 6 month period after the intervention ends
Time frame: 6 months
Forward and Backward Velocity and Double Support Time
Walking speed and double support time (spatiotemporal measures of gait)
Time frame: Change in velocity and double support time at 8 weeks
ABC Scale
Balance confidence
Time frame: Change in balance confidence at 8 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.