Investigate the efficacy and safety of mirogabalin in Chinese participants with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain in comparison to placebo.
The primary objective is to compare change from baseline in weekly Average Daily Pain Score (ADPS) at Week 14 in Chinese patients with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain (DPNP) receiving mirogabalin versus placebo.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
393
Mirogabalin tablets for oral administration
Matching placebo tablets for oral administration
Average Daily Pain Score (ADPS)
The pain scores on a scale of 0-10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = the worst possible pain. The weekly ADPS is based on participants daily pain scores.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 14
ADPS responder rate
Ratio of Participants Responding to Treatment, as Measured by Average Daily Pain Score (ADPS) Reduction from Baseline. The ADPS is used to determine categorical response rates.
Time frame: at Week 14
Pain Intensity Score Using the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ): Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
The VAS, in which the participant rates pain on a 100 mm-long horizontal line, where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = worst possible pain.
Time frame: at Week 14
Patient Global Impression of Change
Participants rate their overall impression of how the present pain compares to baseline using a 7-point scale, where 1 = very much improved and 7 = very much worse. Patient Global Impression of Change scores are used to determine categorical responder rates.
Time frame: at Week 14
Average Daily Sleep Interference score (ADSIS)
The sleep interference scores on a scale of 0-10, where 0 = pain did not interfere with sleep to 10 = pain completely interfered with sleep. The weekly ADSIS is based on participants daily sleep interference scores.
Time frame: at Week 14
Medical Outcome Study (MOS) sleep scale
Participants rate their sleep quality during the past 4 weeks in three parts of the questionnaire: Part 1 - The participants rate the average time required to fall asleep, 0-15 minutes = 1, 16-30 minutes = 2, 31-45 minutes = 3, 46-60 minutes = 4, More than 60 minutes = 5. Part 2 - The participants give the number of hours per night for the average hours of sleep per night. Part 3 - The participants using a score of 1 (all of the time) to 5 (none of the time) to rate their sleep disturbance in the following areas: difficulty in falling asleep or remaining asleep, difficulty in staying awake during the day, difficulty in breathing, and snoring during sleep.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing, China
Peking University First Hospital
Beijing, China
Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing, China
Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University
Beijing, China
Special Medical Center of Chinese PLA Rocket Force
Beijing, China
Beijing PingGu Hospital
Beijing, China
Cangzhou Central Hospital
Cangzhou, China
Jilin Province People's Hospital
Changchun, China
The First Hospital of Changsha
Changsha, China
The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Changsha, China
...and 30 more locations
Time frame: at Week 14
Five Level EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) version
Participants rate their Quality of Life in the following dimensions: mobility (5-point scale), self-care (5-point scale), usual activities (5-point scale), pain/discomfort (5-point scale), and anxiety/depression(5-point scale) that are combined into an overall health utilities index. Participants also rate their perception of overall health using VAS, with zero indicating worst health and 100 representing best imaginable health.
Time frame: at Week 14