Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Erector Spina Plane Block

Erzincan University100 enrolled

Overview

Regional anesthesia and analgesia techniques are frequently used to provide pain control in pediatric surgical applications. The main advantages of these techniques include ease of application, good analgesic efficacy and low risk of complications (1). It reduces the need for parenteral opioids and increases the quality of postoperative pain control and the satisfaction of the patient and family (2). The aim of this study was to compare the contribution of TAP block and ESP block combined with sedation in pediatric surgery to anesthesia and analgesia during surgery without general anesthesia.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

DOUBLE

Enrollment

100

Conditions

Intraoperative Pain Control

Interventions

Ultrasound guided erector spinae blockDEVICE

Group 2 (n: 50): those who underwent ESP block after propofol atropine induction and maintained with only 1 mg / kg / h propofol in anesthesia maintenance

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 2 YearsMax age: 6 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * ASA I-II, * undergo elective lower abdominal surgery * 2-6 years Exclusion Criteria: * Psychiatric patients, * weight\> 40 kg, * those with cardiac-pulmonary-neurological disease, * those with bleeding disorders, * infection or wound scarring at the injection site, * known allergy to local anesthetics

Locations (1)

Erzincan University

Erzincan, Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Visual analogue scale

effectiveness of erector spinae block on intraoperative anesthesia

Time frame: 4 months

Central Contacts

ilke küpeli

CONTACT

+905555485632 ilkeser2004@gmail.com

ufuk kuyrukluyıldız

CONTACT

drufuk2001@gmail.com

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.