The aim of this study is to investigate how safe and effective the addition of the new medicine midostaurin to decitabine is for the treatment of unfit acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplasia (MDS) patients. Patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy because of accompanying diseases may opt for gentler treatment. This does not produce a cure but serves to allow the quality of life to be acceptable for as long as possible. Decitabine is an example of a gentler treatment. It is effective against leukemia and has fewer side effects than intensive chemotherapy. Given in courses of 5 successive days, decitabine is registered for the treatment of AML. There is scientific research to suggest that decitabine is more effective and generally well tolerated when given in courses of 10 successive days. Therefore, treatment with 10-day courses of decitabine is the standard treatment in this scientific research. The aim is to investigate whether this standard treatment can be improved by adding a new product, midostaurin. Midostaurin is a medicine that is directed against a specific protein on leukaemia cells (FLT3).
This trial aims to develop effective treatments for unfit (i.e. Hematopoietic cell transplantation co-morbidity index (HCT-CI) ≥ 3) in adult (≥ 18 yrs) AML patients, for whom current treatment strategies are highly unsatisfactory. Therefore new treatment modalities are introduced and evaluated in multiple parallel randomized phase II studies that will be conducted within the frame of a master protocol. The scheme of this new design consists of one arm with one of the currently considered best available treatments for unfit AML patients (i.e. 10-day decitabine). After a maximum of 3 10-day courses, or less in case of good response, treatment will be continued with 5-day decitabine courses. This treatment will be compared to investigational treatments in combination with decitabine. The competitor of the 10-day decitabine schedule will be 10-day decitabine combined (sequential) with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor midostaurin (independent of the presence of FLT3 mutations). The rationale for midostaurin is: 1) single agent midostaurin has shown efficacy in both FLT3 wild type and mutant AML; 2) it has shown efficacy in a phase III randomized controlled trial when combined with intensive chemotherapy in FLT3-mutated AML (RATIFY study); 3) midostaurin has been successfully combined with hypomethylating agents (azacitidine and decitabine) and improved the response compared with historical response rates of these drugs, suggesting at least additive affects of midostaurin with hypomethylating agents.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
140
Decitabine dosage 20mg/m2 i.v.
Midostaurin 50 mg b.i.d.
BE-Antwerpen-ZNASTUIVENBERG
Antwerp, Belgium
BE-Haine-Saint-Paul-JOLIMONT
Haine-Saint-Paul, Belgium
BE-Roeselare-AZDELTA
Roeselare, Belgium
DE-Magdeburg-OVGU
Magdeburg, Germany
NL-Den Bosch-JBZ
's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
NL-Amersfoort-MEANDERMC
Cumulative Complete Remission (CR) / CR with incomplete blood count (CRi) rate
Cumulative CR/CRi rate during 3 cycles
Time frame: 4-5 months
Safety and tolerability of midostaurin determined by the type, frequency, severity and relationship of adverse events to study treatment
Safety and tolerability of midostaurin added to 10-day decitabine treatment for AML (type, frequency, severity and relationship of adverse events to study treatment).
Time frame: 5 years
Efficacy profile
The response rate after first three cycles together with the best response during three cycles and after 9 months will determinine the efficacy profile.
Time frame: 4-9 months
Event free survival (EFS)
The time from registration to induction failure, death or relapse whichever occurs first).
Time frame: 5 years
Overall survival (OS)
The time from the date of randomization to the date of death, whatever the cause. Patients still alive at the date last contact will be censored.
Time frame: 5 years
Hospital stay duration
Days of staying in hospital during 3 cycles.
Time frame: 4-5 months
Transfusion need
Number of participants with transfusion needs during 3 cycles.
Time frame: 4-5 months
Prognostic value of MRD
Assessment of the prognostic value of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) by flowcytometry or PCR
Time frame: 9 months and at relapse
Predictive value of gene mutations
Assessment of the predictive value of gene mutations by exploratory analysis
Time frame: 5 years
Prognostic value of baseline physical conditions as measured by the short physical performance battery
Assessment of the prognostic value of baseline physical and functional conditions using a comprehensive geriatric assessment tool, short physical performance battery (SPPB), on treatment outcome. Total scores (range 0 to 12) will be used to determine physical performance.
Time frame: 5 years
Prognostic value of baseline functional conditions as measured by the activities of daily living
Assessment of the prognostic value of baseline functional conditions using a comprehensive geriatric assessment tool, activities of daily living (ADL), on treatment outcome. Total points (range 0 to 6) will be used to determine functional condition.
Time frame: 5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Amersfoort, Netherlands
NL-Amsterdam-OLVG
Amsterdam, Netherlands
NL-Amsterdam-VUMC
Amsterdam, Netherlands
NL-Arnhem-RIJNSTATE
Arnhem, Netherlands
NL-Breda-AMPHIA
Breda, Netherlands
...and 27 more locations