Among patients with opioid use disorder (OUD), 90% report lifetime trauma exposure and 33% meet criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The co-occurrence of OUD and PTSD is associated with worse mental health and opioid agonist treatment (OAT) outcomes relative to either diagnosis alone. Prolonged exposure therapy (PET) is an efficacious cognitive-behavioral treatment for reducing PTSD severity. Although preliminary findings indicate that PET may reduce PTSD symptom severity among patients receiving treatment for concomitant OUD, it is unclear to what extent improvements were a function of PET versus the effects of OAT itself. Therefore, the question of whether OAT alone may attenuate PTSD symptoms in the absence of intensive cognitive-behavioral therapy remains unanswered. In this 12-week trial, we aim to investigate the contribution of PET above and beyond OAT alone for reducing PTSD symptoms among adults with concurrent PTSD and OUD. Participants will be randomized to one of three conditions: (a) OAT as usual, (b) OAT + PET, or (c) OAT + Enhanced PET (OAT+PET+). Those randomized to OAT as usual will continue to receive standard buprenorphine or methadone treatment from their current treatment provider and complete assessments of PTSD symptom severity, psychosocial functioning and drug use at intake and Study Weeks 4, 8, and 12. In addition to receiving OAT and completing monthly assessments, OAT+PET participants will receive PET consisting of 12 weekly, individual sessions with a trained therapist. Finally, OAT+PET+ participants will receive the procedures noted above for the OAT+PET group plus monetary incentives delivered contingent upon completion of PET sessions. Given the poor PET adherence rates reported among patients with substance use disorders, the use of incentives will ensure that we evaluate PET effects among patients who receive a sufficient dose of therapy. The proposed study design will permit us to disentangle the effects of PET from the effects of OAT alone while also including experimental conditions that reflect real-world practice. Taken together, this project will produce important new scientific and clinically-relevant information related to the mechanisms through which OAT and PET promote reductions in PTSD symptomatology in a highly vulnerable clinical population.
Among patients with opioid use disorder (OUD), 90% report lifetime trauma exposure and 33% meet criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The co-occurrence of OUD and PTSD is associated with more severe mental health symptoms and worse opioid agonist treatment (OAT) outcomes relative to either diagnosis alone. Prolonged exposure therapy (PET) is an efficacious manualized cognitive-behavioral treatment for reducing PTSD severity. Although preliminary findings indicate that PET may reduce PTSD symptom severity among patients receiving treatment for concomitant OUD, it is unclear to what extent observed improvements were a function of PET versus the psychopharmacological effects of OAT itself. Therefore, the question of whether OAT alone may attenuate PTSD symptomatology in the absence of intensive cognitive-behavioral therapy remains unanswered and is important given the prevalence and deleterious effects of PTSD among OAT patients, as well as the ever-present constraints on mental health resources in substance use treatment settings. The present study will investigate the contribution of PET above and beyond OAT alone for reducing PTSD symptomatology among adults with concurrent PTSD and OUD. Eligible participants who complete the informed consent process will be randomized to one of three conditions: (a) OAT as usual, (b) OAT + PET, or (c) OAT + Enhanced PET (OAT+PET+). Those randomized to OAT as usual will continue to receive standard buprenorphine or methadone treatment from their current treatment provider and complete assessments of PTSD symptom severity, psychosocial functioning and drug use at intake and Study Weeks 4, 8, and 12. Follow-up assessment visits will be conducted in-person at our clinic following all relevant COVID-19-related CDC guidelines and university safety protocols. However, study measures may also be administered remotely via phone or telemedicine to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission. In addition to receiving OAT and completing monthly assessments, OAT+PET participants will receive PET consisting of 12 weekly, individual sessions with a trained therapist. Therapy sessions will be conducted at our research clinic or remotely via telemedicine to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission. Finally, OAT+PET+ participants will receive the procedures noted above for the OAT+PET group plus monetary incentives delivered contingent upon completion of PET sessions. Given the poor PET adherence rates reported among patients with substance use disorder (SUDs), the use of incentives will ensure that we evaluate PET effects among patients who receive a sufficient dose of therapy. For inclusion in the study, participants must meet the following criteria: (a) \> 18 years of age, (b) currently maintained on a stable methadone or buprenorphine dose for the treatment of OUD for \>1 month prior to the study, (c) endorse \>1 lifetime traumatic event, and (c) meet the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-V) PTSD diagnostic criteria (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Exclusion criteria include: (a) the presence of an acute psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder with an active manic episode (but not simply the presence of bipolar disorder), (b) imminent risk for suicide, (c) a medical condition that may interfere with consent or participation (e.g., organic brain syndrome, dementia, head injury, neuropathy, etc.), and (d) illiteracy in English. Participants randomized to OAT as usual will continue to receive standard buprenorphine or methadone maintenance from their current treatment provider and complete assessments of PTSD symptom severity, psychosocial functioning and drug use at Study Weeks 4, 8, and 12. Follow-up assessment visits will be conducted in-person at our clinic following all relevant COVID-19-related CDC guidelines and university safety protocols. However, study measures may also be administered remotely via phone or telemedicine to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission. In addition to receiving standard buprenorphine- or methadone-maintenance treatment as described above and completing monthly assessments, OAT+PET participants will also receive 12 individual sessions of PET. Therapy sessions will be conducted at our research clinic or remotely via telemedicine to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission. Beginning in Study Week 1, OAT+PET participants will complete weekly 60-minute PET sessions provided by a therapist trained in PET. Participants randomized to the OAT+PET+ condition will receive the procedures noted above for the OAT+PET group plus monetary incentives delivered contingent upon completion of PET sessions. Each consecutive attended session will increase the voucher amount so that each consecutively attended appointment is worth an incrementally higher dollar amount. To support completion of the full 12-week PET protocol, we will also incorporate additional strategically-placed bonuses into the reinforcement schedule with the goal of maximizing the percentage of subjects who complete the full 12-session protocol. First, to support consistent (vs. sporadic) attendance, participants will receive a bonus for every two consecutive sessions attended. Second, to support completion of the full PET protocol, participants will receive an additional bonus upon completion of Session 12.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
52
Within the general population, prolonged exposure therapy (PET) is a widely-used, empirically-supported and manualized therapy that is regarded as a first-line cognitive-behavioral treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). PET is designed to disrupt the cycle of anxiety and avoidance that characterizes PTSD via sustained imaginal and in-vivo exposure exercises that deliberately and systematically expose patients to painful memories and current, real-life trauma reminders that were previously avoided, yet not inherently harmful. Overall, PET has well-documented efficacy for reducing PTSD symptom severity in both civilian and veteran populations. PET is effective for reducing PTSD symptoms regardless of whether it is delivered remotely or face-to-face. Recent data also suggest that PET can improve PTSD symptoms without exacerbating substance use or craving among patients with substance use disorders when PET and substance use disorder treatment are delivered concurrently.
Participants will earn vouchers that have monetary value for attending scheduled PET appointments. Each consecutive attended session will increase the voucher amount so that each consecutively attended appointment is worth an incrementally higher dollar amount. To support completion of the full 12-week PET protocol, we will also incorporate additional strategically-placed bonuses into the reinforcement schedule with the goal of maximizing the percentage of subjects who complete the full 12-session protocol. First, to support consistent (vs. sporadic) attendance, participants will receive a bonus for every two consecutive sessions attended. Second, to support completion of the full PET protocol, participants will receive an additional bonus upon completion of Session 12.
University of Vemont
Burlington, Vermont, United States
Change in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Symptom Severity
Change in PTSD symptom severity will be measured by the total symptom severity score of the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-V (CAPS-5). The CAPS-5 is a clinician-administered clinical interview that produces a total symptom severity score that is obtained by summing the scores for each of the 20 items. Scores range from 0-80 with lower scores indicating less severe symptoms of PTSD. A negative sign in front of a number represents a decrease in score and less severe PTSD symptoms at 12 weeks compared to baseline. A greater decrease in score represents greater reduction in symptoms (more positive outcomes).
Time frame: 12 weeks
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Symptom Severity
Mean PTSD symptom severity will be measured by the PTSD Checklist for DSM-V (PCL-5) total score. The PCL-5 is a self-report measure that produces a total score that is obtained by summing the scores for each of the the 20 items. Scores range from 0-80 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms of PTSD.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Anxiety Symptom Severity
Mean anxiety symptom severity will be measured by the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) total score. The BAI is a self-report measure that produces a total score that is obtained by summing the scores for each of the 21 items. Scores range from 0-63 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms of anxiety.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Depression Symptom Severity
Mean depression symptom severity will be measured by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) total score. The BDI-II is a self-report measure that produces a total score that is obtained by summing the scores for each of the 21 items. Scores range from 0-63 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms of depression.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Number of Participants Achieving Illicit Opioid Abstinence
Illicit opioid abstinence will be measured by the overall percentage of urinalyses biochemically verified to be abstinent for illicit opioids at the end of the intervention period.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Psychiatric Problems Related to Substance Use
Psychiatric problems related to substance use will be measured by the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) Psychiatric subscale score. The ASI is a clinician-administered structured interview. Scores for this subscale range from 0-1 with higher scores indicating more severe psychiatric consequences of substance use.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Number of Participants Who Report Abstinence From Illicit Non-opioid Substance Use
Abstinence from illicit non-opioid substance use will be measured by the Timeline Follow-back (TLFB). The TLFB will be administered by an interviewer and involves participants retrospectively estimating their illicit non-opioid substance use (e.g., amphetamines, benzodiazepines, cocaine) during the 30 days prior to the interview date. Abstinence from illicit non-opioid substance use will be measured by the overall number of participants reporting abstinence from illicit non-opioid substances .
Time frame: 12 weeks
Pain Intensity and Interference
For participants who endorsed the presence of pain during the past month, pain intensity and interference will be measured by Brief Pain Inventory -Short Form (BPI-SF). The BPI-SF is a self-report measure of pain intensity and interference in function during the past week. The pain intensity section of the BPI includes a rating of average pain intensity; whereas, the functional interference section consists of a rating of pain interference on general activity. Items assessing pain intensity and functional interference are scored from 0-10 with higher scores indicating greater pain severity and functional interference, respectively.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Delay Discounting
Rates of delay discounting will be measured by the Monetary Choice Questionnaire (MCQ). The MCQ is a 27-item self-report measure consisting of items that presents a choice between smaller, immediate and larger, delayed monetary rewards. Immediate reward values ranged from $11 to $80, delayed rewards ranged from $25 to $85 and the length of the delay ranged from 7 days to 186 days. "Discounting rates," or k-values, are calculated from individuals' choices across items and represent rates at which the individual devalues rewards overall. The estimate of participant's discounting "k" was estimated with the following formula: V = A/(1+kD) where V is the present discounted value of the reinforcer, A is the objective value of the reinforcer, D is the delay until the receipt of the reinforcer, and k is the derived parameter that corresponds to the rate of discounting. In this equation, larger k values correspond to greater discounting of delayed rewards, or preference for small
Time frame: 12 weeks
Insomnia Severity
Insomnia severity will be measured by the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). The ISI is a self-report measure that consists of 7 items that are scored from 0-4. The ISI produces a total score that is obtained by summing the scores for each of the the 7 items. Scores range from 0-28 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms of insomnia.
Time frame: 12 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.