Update 13.12.2021 To mitigate the effects the COVID-19 pandemic, and due to difficulties in sites setting up the custom orthoses arm of the protocol an amendment was approved to change the design of the study from a 3 to a 2 arm trial. The amendment drops the custom orthoses arm and was implemented prior to the start of recruitment. As a child grows the shape of their foot changes and most develop an arch in their foot. For some, however, the arch does not fully form or it might be flat against the ground. This is known as having flat feet and it can cause pain in the feet, legs, or back. At the moment, we are not sure what the best treatment for flat feet is, so the purpose of this research is to conduct a trial to compare two of the most common treatments. The first is exercise and advice about things like which types of shoes might help. The second of the treatment is a type of insole, which is put inside the shoe. Participants will receive their treatment as part of their normal National Health System care. We would like 478 children and young people aged between 6 and 14 years old to take part in the study. Everyone will receive advice about the type of shoes to wear, ankle exercises and things to look out for when children have painful flat feet. In addition to this, half of the participants will receive a pre-made insole that is the right size. We will ask for their help for 12 months. During this time, we will track their progress by sending them 3 questionnaires in the post to fill in and weekly text messages to find out how painful their feet are during the first few months. We also want to learn more about the problems that flat feet cause, and children's experiences of the treatments delivered as part of this clinical trial. We will explore this through in-depth conversations with children and their parent(s) or the person who looks after them. Once we have finished the trial, we will work with the people who took part in the trial, and clinicians, to make sure that our results can be used by as many people as possible. We will run 3 additional studies. The first will find out if having information about the study in the form of a video in addition to information in a paper booklet will increase recruitment rates. The second will find out if sending participants a birthday card will increase the response rates to postal questionnaires. The third study will take a 3D impression of the participant's foot and see if it changes over the course of the study.
The aim of the study is to undertake a large, pragmatic, multi-armed, randomised controlled trial to assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of prefabricated orthoses in addition to exercises and advice compared with exercises and advice alone on the physical functioning of children with symptomatic flat feet. We will aim to recruit 478 children with flat feet. They will be allocated to one of two groups, in a 1:1 ratio to either (a) prefabricated orthoses plus exercises and footwear advice or (b) exercises and footwear advice only. We will follow the participants up for 12 months after randomisation to assess their physical functioning, levels of pain and quality of life. We will undertake qualitative interviews with approximately 30 children and their parents, to find out about their experiences of having flat feet, and of being in the trial. In addition to the main OSTRICH study we will undertake two additional trial methodological Studies within a Trial (SWAT) and a sub-study. The multimedia trial information SWAT: This SWAT will evaluate the effectiveness of including signposting to multimedia trial information in the patient information sheet, which is sent to participants in their recruitment pack. The birthday card SWAT: This SWAT will evaluate the effectiveness of sending a birthday card to participants on response rates to postal questionnaires. Foot scan sub-study: This embedded observational sub-study will assess the capability of a 3D scanning approach to identify and stratify severity of pes planus and to assess change in foot shape over the duration of the trial. We will investigate the associations between aspects of foot shape and score on the physical domain scale of the OxAFQ-C.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
134
Birthday card sent to participants in the post
Prefabricated insole
Signposting to multimedia information in the patient information sheet which is sent to participants in the post as part of the OSTRICH recruitment pack.
Active comparator
East Cheshire NHS Trust
Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom
Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Birmingham, United Kingdom
Bolton NHS Foundation Trust
Bolton, United Kingdom
Cardiff and Vale University Local Health Board
Cardiff, United Kingdom
Medway Community Healthcare
Gillingham, United Kingdom
North Lincolnshire & Goole NHS Foundation Trust
Goole, United Kingdom
Harrogate and District Foundation Trust
Harrogate, United Kingdom
Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust
Leeds, United Kingdom
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Leeds, United Kingdom
Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust
Maidstone, United Kingdom
...and 6 more locations
Physical domain subscale of the Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire for Children (OxAFQ-C) over the 12 month follow-up period.
The OxAFQ-C is a self-report health status measure questionnaire for child patients (aged 5-14) affected by foot and ankle conditions that are considered important to children. There are three domains, whose domain scores are reported separately (ie there is no total score). For the primary outcome however, we will just use the physical domain subscale. There are 6 items on the 'Physical' domain. The response options to each item are on a 5-point scale rated from never (4), rarely (3), sometimes (2), very often (1) to always (0), where the number in brackets represents the value that should be applied to each response. The total 'physical domain score' is divided by the maximum for the domain ie 24. This score can then be transformed to a percentage scale (0-100) to aid interpretation. A higher score for a domain represents better functioning. This will be rated by the child (participant) and their parent/legal guardian using a proxy version.
Time frame: For the primary comparison the physical domain subscale will be compared between the groups using a linear covariance pattern mixed model to estimate the effect over the whole 12 month followup, incorporating data from all available time points
The 'School and Play' domain of the Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire for Children (OxAFQ-C)
The OxAFQ-C is a self-report health status measure questionnaire for child patients (aged 5-14) affected by foot and ankle conditions that are considered important to children. There are three domains, whose domain scores are reported separately (ie there is no total score). However for the secondary outcome we will use the 'School and Play' domain. There are 4 items on the 'School and Play' domain. The response options to each item are on a 5-point scale rated from never (4), rarely (3), sometimes (2), very often (1) to always (0), where the number in brackets represents the value that should be applied to each response. The total of the 'School and Play' domain score is divided by the maximum for the domain ie 16. This score can then be transformed to a percentage scale (0-100) to aid interpretation. A higher score for a domain represents better functioning. This will be rated by the child (participant) and their parent/legal guardian using a proxy version.
Time frame: Collected at baseline, 3,6 and 12 months post randomisation
The 'Emotional' subscale of the Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire for Children (OxAFQ-C)
The OxAFQ-C is a self-report health status measure questionnaire for child patients (aged 5-14) affected by foot and ankle conditions that are considered important to children. There are three domains, whose domain scores are reported separately (ie there is no total score). However for the secondary outcome we will use the 'Emotional' domain. There are 4 items on the 'Emotional' domain. The response options to each item are on a 5-point scale rated from never (4), rarely (3), sometimes (2), very often (1) to always (0), where the number in brackets represents the value that should be applied to each response. The total of the 'Emotional' domain score is divided by the maximum for the domain score ie 16. This score can then be transformed to a percentage scale (0-100) to aid interpretation. A higher score for a domain represents better functioning. This will be rated by the child (participant) and their parent/legal guardian using a proxy version.
Time frame: Collected at baseline, 3,6 and 12 months post randomisation
Footwear item of the Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire for Children (OxAFQ-C)
The OxAFQ-C is a self-report health status measure questionnaire for child patients (aged 5-14) affected by foot and ankle conditions that are considered important to children. This item was added to reflect the concern by many children that they can or cannot wear the footwear they prefer. It is a 5-point scale rated from never (4), rarely (3), sometimes (2), very often (1) to always (0), where the number in brackets represents the value. It is reported as a single item with higher score representing better functioning. This will be rated by the child (participant) and their parent/legal guardian using a proxy version.
Time frame: Collected at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months post randomisation
EuroQoL-Five Dimension Youth
The EuroQoL-5 Dimension Youth (EQ5DY) is a child friendly, generic quality of life measure. Health status is measured in terms of 5 domains: "mobility", "looking after myself", "doing usual activities", "having pain or discomfort" and "feeling worried, sad or unhappy". Each dimension has 3 levels ranging from 1 no problems, 2 some problems and 3 a lot of problems. The respondent is asked to indicate their health state by ticking in the box against the most appropriate statement in each of the 5 dimensions. From these 5 dimensions an EuroQoL-5 Dimension Youth (EQ5DY) value is calculated. This measure also includes a Visual Analogue Scale on how good or bad the participant's health is "today", on a vertical scale of 0 to 100. The endpoints of the scale are labelled "100 The best health you can imagine" and "0 The worst health you can imagine." This will be rated by the child (the participant) and their parent/legal guardian (using a proxy version).
Time frame: Collected at baseline, 3,6 and 12 months post randomisation
Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D)
The Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D) is a paediatric self-reported generic quality of life measure. It consists of nine dimensions; "worried", "sad", "pain", "tiredness" "annoyed", "school work/homework", "sleep", "daily routine" and "able to join in activities". The measure is rated on a five point scale on which the participants rate the level to how they are feeling, with a "don't" sentence linked with no problems (e.g. I don't feel sad today) and "very" with the participant experiencing a lot of problems (e.g. I feel very sad). Calculation of an universal score is supported by a specific scoring algorithm, with 1 representing 'full health' and 0 'death'. In this study the CHU9D is rated by the child (the participant) and their parent/legal guardian (using a proxy version).
Time frame: Collected at baseline, 3,6 and 12 months post randomisation
Foot pain score measured by numeric rating scale
Self-report pain status will be measured using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of 0 to 9. The participant will be asked to estimate their pain intensity over the past week, where 0 indicates no pain at all and 9 the worst pain. In this study the foot pain score with numeric rating is rated by the participant's parent/legal guardian .
Time frame: Collected once a week for 12 weeks and at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months post randomisation
Healthcare resource use
Self report healthcare resource use. Healthcare utilisation will be recorded in primary care and the community and within the hospital setting.
Time frame: Collected at baseline, 3,6 and 12 months post randomisation
Foot pain over past week measured by Wong-Baker Faces pain rating scale
Self-report measure of pain in left and right feet, using Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale (0-10) where 0 indicates no pain at all and 10 being the worst possible pain. In this study the foot pain score is rated by the child (the participant).
Time frame: Collected at baseline, 3,6 and 12 months post randomisation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.